J-Rad
In ur comp h4xing ur interwebz
- 1,187
- Posts
- 17
- Years
- Age 31
- reading a good book
- Seen Oct 31, 2016
serebii has evrything in an orginized fasion, I don't like marrilands for some reason, never heard of the other one, so SEREBII ALL THE WAY!!!!!
None of the above, in my opinion. All of them pale in comparison to the awesomeness that is Veekun.com (although Veekun occasionally has its downtimes).
Serebii has bells and whistles (i.e. anti-right click), sure, but it just doesn't have the neatness or the reliability of other sites. I know in the past that its 'dex has had errors and that the site overall has had poor or stolen information, so I generally don't trust it, even now that it's supposedly "cleaned up its act."
I HAVE NOT POSTED ANY STOLEN INFORMATION IN LIKE 6 YEARS. GET THE HELL OVER IT. I'm ****ing fed up with people saying **** like this.
Because I hate it when people try to besmirch my good name? My site was nothing back then. Nobody visited it. Now its the most visited Pokemon site by a massive margin. Therefore the "reputation" is void and its just a few nay-sayers spreading it.That reminds me. I don't like going to Serebii because the owner's like this. =P
(That and he doesn't realize that reputation and reliability are based on past actions or that an automated system is only as good as the people who program it. You don't gain the trust of a population early on, and you're screwed for the rest of your career. But mostly, it's because he's like that. *points up*)
Mostly Serebii, merely because it was the first one I'd heard of, so I'm the most used to it...
I HAVE NOT POSTED ANY STOLEN INFORMATION IN LIKE 6 YEARS. GET THE HELL OVER IT
Because I hate it when people try to besmirch my good name?
Plus, the reliability of the information is actually dependant on the information itself and not the person who creates a system for it.
Does Serebii's past actually relate to the pokedex?
but I can never find steelix lol...it's there, it just takes awhile to find it.
Sure, it's frustrating, and I understand that. However, it's no reason to flame someone who actually didn't directly say that you yourself are currently a thief. All I said was that you were, and that was just enough of a reason for me to be skeptical about your site, as I don't trust anyone who as at one point a thief. It's my personal belief that if you royally screwed up in the past (even to the point where you refused to take down the information) that even if you cleaned up now, it really shouldn't be worth my vote at all. Some people might think differently, but that's just how I feel. It's my opinion, and you're definitely not about to change that, especially if you go around flaming people who "want to slander your good name." (Tip: It's not slander if it was true. Again, sure, you probably don't do it anymore, but that doesn't mean you never did it.) Sorry, but this girl just doesn't think you tried very hard to build one to begin with. If it wasn't unreliable information or information theft, it was your attitude. (You kiss your mother with that mouth, my dear?)
It's both. You have one flaw in the program, and the program generates flawed information, even if you think you've defined it correctly. Think of it like this. You build a machine that you meant to have make tacks, but you accidentally tell the program to make ticks. So, you get ticks in return, even though you're absolutely certain that you know what a tack looks like, how it's used, whatever.
If you want an example, I've watched Shining Arcanine over at PFU build his Pokedex, and his own at one point contained a ton of errors because he screwed up here and there with how he input codes into the system. Yours, from what I remember, had the same sort of glitches.
You know what's even stupider than establishing someone's character through misdeeds he did in the past, though? Flaming someone who points out said misdeeds. You want to impress me, you act like a webmaster and give me one good reason why I should be impressed.
On a level, yes, considering the fact that it once hosted stolen or inaccurate information, just like any other part of the site. I admit to the fact that I haven't checked it since then, however, so I'm not completely certain if it still does. (Truth be told, I've mostly boycotted the site for years because of the entire fiasco as well as several other horror stories I've heard that are unrelated.)