Alexander Nicholi
what do you know about computing?
- 5,500
- Posts
- 15
- Years
- Age 27
- Research Triangle / Jakarta
- Seen Sep 22, 2024
I went over this before about "Having nothing to hide," but apparently since you didn't catch that I'll go ahead andCiting Snowden is a moot point because, as someone who worked for the NSA, he knew very well how to avoid being tracked by them, something that the average user may not have access to.
And, quite frankly, every high-selling commercial OS has privacy issues. Google is even worse than Microsoft in this regard. Team Fail definitely has a good point. I'd be willing to say that most privacy advocators are probably the people with the most skeletons in the closet, since there's no real reason to be such a staunch privacy supporter if you have nothing to hide. If you do have something to hide, however, it can be eventually found out, and the legal system has means to access your data. Doing bank transactions is a liability, surfing the web is a liability. Cops are everywhere as snitches.
You can't "have nothing to hide" without knowing what they're looking for, lol. Basic logic says that much. The fact of the matter is you don't even know who these "third parties" are so you have no safety with your information whatsoever.
Lol, advocating for privacy is far from advocating for crime. Nice try though. No one cares about criminals, they take what they can get. And those arguments against criminals are nice, except governments are well known to gratuitously abuse their power, and have countless times in the past gone out to not only prosecute and convict non-criminals, but even people advocating or protesting in the name of what most people consider good or charitable. That's a rock-solid reason to not give them any more than they need to keep the peace.Do you think that, if I started posting Nazi or terrorism supporting bullshit for example, the police wouldn't even try to find out who I am, where I live, and so on? They can investigate me if they want, and they have the means to find out. If I'm openly commiting a crime, no amount of "privacy" excuses will save me. Encryption, VPNs, Tor, masked emails only delay the process. You WILL leave a footprint somewhere, because hey, we're human and make mistakes, and, when they find it, your whole privacy setup is compromised.
Remaining inconspicuous also involves a good degree of self-control and avoiding getting into sensitive situations. If you don't do that, no "privacy" will save you from the consequences.
And since this topic is supposed to be about Windows, not governments and crime, I'll reiterate that your phone conversations, chat logs, photos, videos, keystrokes, and webcam being Microsoft's analytical guppie for statistics aggregation isn't acceptable. It's worth noting that most people simply don't give a shit, though. Ever wondered why politics suck?
And as for whether privacy is valuable: Knowledge is power. The more you know, the more powerful you are in relation to what you know. That is a truth. So by giving up all of your information you're giving Microsoft and whoever else buys your info from them a stupidly large amount of power over you. Comfortable?