World Wrestling Entertainment

[Captain Gizmo]

I'm expecting Sting vs Rollins at Night of Champions. Honestly I think Rollins should win because honestly Sting is too old.

He could still perform very well in-ring and losing to someone like Rollins cleanly would just be bad writing from WWE's part. Sting wrestles twice in WWE and he loses both times? It'll make the fans think that Triple H still have a grudge against WCW. I'm not expecting Sting to win because Rollins never won a match by his own in PPVs ever since he won the world title. But if Sting DOES manage to win even with Rollins trying to cheat his way, I would definitely be up for that.

 

[Gandhi Savage]

I'm not expecting Sting to win because Rollins never won a match by his own in PPVs ever since he won the world title.

Just wanted to point out that Rollins' won at MITB without outside interference, even if it ended with the controversial both men holding the belt as they fell off the ladder together. Other than that I don't think having Sting lose clean to Rollins would be poor booking, he needs that big win to solidify him as a threat in the eyes of the casual fan. Losing to HHH on the other hand was just baffling.

 

[Captain Gizmo]

Just wanted to point out that Rollins' won at MITB without outside interference, even if it ended with the controversial both men holding the belt as they fell off the ladder together. Other than that I don't think having Sting lose clean to Rollins would be poor booking, he needs that big win to solidify him as a threat in the eyes of the casual fan. Losing to HHH on the other hand was just baffling.

Oh right, there's that one. i forgot about that, lol. But yea, that's one match out of how many PPV title defense? lmao.
But having Sting losing to Triple H? Understandable since Triple H is a veteran himself but the way he lost is meh. But losing to Seth Rollins? Sting is old but the way he wrestled in Wrestlemania showed that he is far from being tired and close to retiring. He have way more experience in-ring than Rollins and can easily take him on. Because if you're gonna bring Sting, one of the biggest names in the Monday Night War era and have him lose to every single match he's going in WWE, then why even bring him at all? It's Sting, not some random jobber.

 

[Syndrome]

I don't think Seth Rollins beating Sting would solidify much considering that Sting is 97 years old. He just needs to break away from the Authority completely and do his own thing.

 

[Hiatus]

Yep, it'd be nice to see them change the scene a little. He's been with the Authority for a while now.

 

[Seth Rollins]

Snip

Well I wouldn't like if Sting had the belt because i'm afraid he would do like Lesnar, defend the title every 3 months and then disappear. If anyone deserves to win cleanly is Rollins because he works hard. Sting is already one of the greats. I have a great solution: Let him win against Taker at Wrestlemania.

Do you dislike Rollins? How is losing to Trips understandable but losing to Rollins isn't? Why would Triple H win? Believe me Trips won 194091894895895304890 matches maybe even more than Cena. There was really no reason, this proves once and for all that Triple H has and always did have a grudge against WCW. Trips never had anything special in him, he wasn't great, he was this guy that worked with the greats.

 

[Captain Gizmo]

Well I wouldn't like if Sting had the belt because i'm afraid he would do like Lesnar, defend the title every 3 months and then disappear. If anyone deserves to win cleanly is Rollins because he works hard. Sting is already one of the greats. I have a great solution: Let him win against Taker at Wrestlemania.

Do you dislike Rollins? How is losing to Trips understandable but losing to Rollins isn't? Why would Triple H win? Believe me Trips won 194091894895895304890 matches maybe even more than Cena. There was really no reason, this proves once and for all that Triple H has and always did have a grudge against WCW. Trips never had anything special in him, he wasn't great, he was this guy that worked with the greats.

So what's the point of having Sting back if he's going to lose every single one of his matches? Sting having the belt would make a huge feud with The Authority. And I don't personally hate Rollins but this diva character he got going on is kinda lame imo.

Trust me, I wanted Sting to win as much as the next guy. But having Triple H win against Sting could've made a great story but they kinda let that go in the process and went for a Sting vs. Rollins instead. Also, Triple H had great matches and was always entertaining to watch in and out of the ring. Of course he can get away with practically both storywise and matchwise since he's boning Vince McMahon's daughter.

 

[Seth Rollins]

So what's the point of having Sting back if he's going to lose every single one of his matches? Sting having the belt would make a huge feud with The Authority. And I don't personally hate Rollins but this diva character he got going on is kinda lame imo.

Trust me, I wanted Sting to win as much as the next guy. But having Triple H win against Sting could've made a great story but they kinda let that go in the process and went for a Sting vs. Rollins instead. Also, Triple H had great matches and was always entertaining to watch in and out of the ring. Of course he can get away with practically both storywise and matchwise since he's boning Vince McMahon's daughter.

Wouldn't a win against Taker in WM be amazing for Sting? I honestly don't care who wins the belt at Night of Champions because I love both Sting and Rollins but seriously, Seth's been working hard lately just so he can lose his belt to a part timer? Kind of like how CM Punk lost his belt to The Rock?? "And I don't personally hate Rollins but this diva character he got going on is kinda lame imo." lmao what diva character? He's an amazing heel and the fact that you called him a "diva" means he is doing his job pretty well. He has the potential to surpass even Edge. He's acting as a cowardly heel, you can't expect him to win every single match clean. Watch Cena vs Rollins he kicked ass, he carried Cena in that match. + vs Dean which he won cleanly.I blame Trips for winning against him in WM 31. That totally should not have happened. The match itself was good but I know some people that rated it 6/10 because of who won. And trust me, Sting could have chosen not to lose his first match but instead decided to go with it for some odd reason.

 

[Captain Gizmo]

Wouldn't a win against Taker in WM be amazing for Sting? I honestly don't care who wins the belt at Night of Champions because I love both Sting and Rollins but seriously, Seth's been working hard lately just so he can lose his belt to a part timer? Kind of like how CM Punk lost his belt to The Rock?? "And I don't personally hate Rollins but this diva character he got going on is kinda lame imo." lmao what diva character? He's an amazing heel and the fact that you called him a "diva" means he is doing his job pretty well. He has the potential to surpass even Edge. He's acting as a cowardly heel, you can't expect him to win every single match clean. Watch Cena vs Rollins he kicked ass, he carried Cena in that match. + vs Dean which he won cleanly.I blame Trips for winning against him in WM 31. That totally should not have happened. The match itself was good but I know some people that rated it 6/10 because of who won. And trust me, Sting could have chosen not to lose his first match but instead decided to go with it for some odd reason.

Yes, but now he lost to Brock Lesnar and tarnishing his legacy in Wrestlemania once more will be bad for WWE, it already caused an uproar when 'Taker lost against Lesnar.
Seth is a good wrestler, but I would put him as a B+ class wrestler at best at this point in time. His persona of a champion that can't win by his own means is lame and people are getting tired of it. The loss that Rollins got during Raw this week was pretty awesome to see. Hopefully it'll happen again during NOC.
And potential to pass Edge? Imo, he's not quite up there yet. None of his matches until now has made me go, oh hey I can definitely see this guy going into the Hall of Fame one day.
Also, the wrestlers don't always choose the outcome to their fights. Huge majority of the time they go with what WWE had planned for them, so they can't always go like no I don't wanna do that, I'll do it my own way.

 

[Geltza]

What do you guys think of Dolph Ziggler? Do you think he can ever rise and become a mainstay in the main event?

I personally think he's a solid mid-card superstar and with a bit of a gimmick tweak and another finisher he could make it. When I seen him coming out wearing the long tights I started to think. Give this guy Shawn Michaels Sweet Chin Music as a finisher and make him the next "heart break kid". Hell Shawn could even teach him to "perfect" it (storyline wise). Seeing him tuning up the band or popping a superkick (as a finisher) out of nowhere would be great. I mean Rollins has the Pedigree now, why couldn't Dolph take Sweet Chin Music?

 

[Hiatus]

It feels to me that Rollins using Pedigree is more of a temporary thing, considering he's in a program with Authority and his Curb Stomp finisher was banned recently. It'd be nice to see Dolph bring Sweet Chin Music back, but although it might get fans cheering, I don't believe it would elevate him to the top. One of the reasons as to why he's being held back like this, if I'm not wrong, is how prone he is to injury. He has had a history of taking time off solely due to that.

 

[Captain Gizmo]

What do you guys think of Dolph Ziggler? Do you think he can ever rise and become a mainstay in the main event?

I personally think he's a solid mid-card superstar and with a bit of a gimmick tweak and another finisher he could make it. When I seen him coming out wearing the long tights I started to think. Give this guy Shawn Michaels Sweet Chin Music as a finisher and make him the next "heart break kid". Hell Shawn could even teach him to "perfect" it (storyline wise). Seeing him tuning up the band or popping a superkick (as a finisher) out of nowhere would be great. I mean Rollins has the Pedigree now, why couldn't Dolph take Sweet Chin Music?

Rollins is with the pedigree because he's with the Authority right now. Give a few months and him and the Authority will break away from each other and he will have another finisher.

As for Dolph Ziggler, I agree he's a mid-card superstar but and as of now he's a B class wrestler at best. But with some improvement and the right push he can become an A class wrestler. Dolph is great in ring and he gets the crowd going and he definitely have his ways with the ladies. So again, with the right push and some improvement, he'd definitely be the next big thing ressembling Shawn Michaels (hopefully not a blatant copy but something similar but with a Dolph Ziggler feel to it)

 

[Seth Rollins]

oops forgot about this

Yes, but now he lost to Brock Lesnar and tarnishing his legacy in Wrestlemania once more will be bad for WWE, it already caused an uproar when 'Taker lost against Lesnar.
Seth is a good wrestler, but I would put him as a B+ class wrestler at best at this point in time. His persona of a champion that can't win by his own means is lame and people are getting tired of it. The loss that Rollins got during Raw this week was pretty awesome to see. Hopefully it'll happen again during NOC.
And potential to pass Edge? Imo, he's not quite up there yet. None of his matches until now has made me go, oh hey I can definitely see this guy going into the Hall of Fame one day.
Also, the wrestlers don't always choose the outcome to their fights. Huge majority of the time they go with what WWE had planned for them, so they can't always go like no I don't wanna do that, I'll do it my own way.

#1."ohhh but undertaker already lost it will be bad for wwe i mean it will be bad for his legacy etc." Taker's loss caused an uproar because:

1. People did not want Lesnar.
2. Taker's loss was a shock and considering there are a lot of huge Taker fans (like you) it's not surprising at all most of them were butthurt he lost.

I mean seriously you're being a huge Taker fanboy here. So your logic is a 50 years old pro-wrestler can't lose to Sting but new fresh talent like Rollins should lose to a 55 years old legend? Explain please.

#2. "Seth is a good wrestler, but I would put him as a B+ class wrestler at best at this point in time. His persona of a champion that can't win by his own means is lame and people are getting tired of it." I...explained that before, if you think a heel like him should win cleanly all the time you really don't understand how pro-wrestling works. It is lame? People are getting tired of it? That's exactly what WWE wants you to think.

#3. "And potential to pass Edge? Imo, he's not quite up there yet. None of his matches until now has made me go, oh hey I can definitely see this guy going into the Hall of Fame one day." Seth is probably going to the hall of fame because he's a hard worker UNLESS some shit controversy thingy like Benoit happens to him. It's also a bit unfair to compare Seth to Edge with matches because most of Edge's matches were hardcore extreme, used tables, chairs, ladders, and no not TLC, it's TLC with real blood. while Seth is stuck in the PG era where anything like that is not allowed. Even so, have you ever saw that Seth vs Dean where both of them jumped out of a huge cell and got smashed into the table? I mean check all of WWE's top matches 2015. All of them included Seth (:

#4. "Also, the wrestlers don't always choose the outcome to their fights. Huge majority of the time they go with what WWE had planned for them, so they can't always go like no I don't wanna do that, I'll do it my own way." True, I'll give you that, I just thought that since Sting was a WCW legend and how it surely wasn't easy to get him, they probs had him choose the outcome of his first match. Maybe, who knows.

 

[Captain Gizmo]

oops forgot about this



#1."ohhh but undertaker already lost it will be bad for wwe i mean it will be bad for his legacy etc." Taker's loss caused an uproar because:

1. People did not want Lesnar.
2. Taker's loss was a shock and considering there are a lot of huge Taker fans (like you) it's not surprising at all most of them were butthurt he lost.

I mean seriously you're being a huge Taker fanboy here. So your logic is a 50 years old pro-wrestler can't lose to Sting but new fresh talent like Rollins should lose to a 55 years old legend? Explain please.

#2. "Seth is a good wrestler, but I would put him as a B+ class wrestler at best at this point in time. His persona of a champion that can't win by his own means is lame and people are getting tired of it." I...explained that before, if you think a heel like him should win cleanly all the time you really don't understand how pro-wrestling works. It is lame? People are getting tired of it? That's exactly what WWE wants you to think.

#3. "And potential to pass Edge? Imo, he's not quite up there yet. None of his matches until now has made me go, oh hey I can definitely see this guy going into the Hall of Fame one day." Seth is probably going to the hall of fame because he's a hard worker UNLESS some muk controversy thingy like Benoit happens to him. It's also a bit unfair to compare Seth to Edge with matches because most of Edge's matches were hardcore extreme, used tables, chairs, ladders, and no not TLC, it's TLC with real blood. while Seth is stuck in the PG era where anything like that is not allowed. Even so, have you ever saw that Seth vs Dean where both of them jumped out of a huge cell and got smashed into the table? I mean check all of WWE's top matches 2015. All of them included Seth (:

#4. "Also, the wrestlers don't always choose the outcome to their fights. Huge majority of the time they go with what WWE had planned for them, so they can't always go like no I don't wanna do that, I'll do it my own way." True, I'll give you that, I just thought that since Sting was a WCW legend and how it surely wasn't easy to get him, they probs had him choose the outcome of his first match. Maybe, who knows.

Because you're not being a hugeRollins' fanboy neither, right? Everyone got their favorite wrestlers and ofc they won't talk bad about them. But the reason I hate how they're underplaying the Undertaker so much lately is because although he IS getting old, they could've made a better storyline(up until now) than making him lose and lose and lose. Even a lot of wrestlers were shocked that they ended the streak and they even said they wouldn't end the streak themselves. So unless the end show of this whole Undertaker storyline build up will be worth it, I'm not gonna pretend to be liking this one bit.

I really don't see Rollins' staying in WWE for a very long time to make a household name for himself. And you said it yourself, he's new and fresh. Younger doesn't necessarily means better. Sting is still a very good wrestler in the ring and I'll admit, he looks a lot healthier than Undertaker in the ring. Or maybe that's just because he's being booked with Lesnar who's just a freakin' huge powerhouse who can't control his own strength.

If you think heels won their matches dirty, then YOU dont understand how pro-wrestling works, a lot of good wrestlers in the past who were heels won a ton of their match cleanly and when they did win dirty, they were aware of it. Which is not the case for Rollins who makes it look like it was all him. And ofc WWE wants me to think that, it's scripted. In the beginning it was alright, but it's going on for months now and people are getting tired of this storyline, so maybe NoC we'll get something new, who knows.

Maybe YOU think Rollins is going into the hall of fame, but me personally, I don't think so. And I compared him to Edge cuz you did in the first place. Where did you get this info btw? I just checked the top 10 matches of 2015 until now on the WWE site, and Seth Rollins was only in one of them and it was the one with Dean Ambrose.

Hopefully, it WAS Sting's idea, because Triple H have been known to go his way or the highway when it comes to decision making, even dating back to the Attitude Era he was doing so. But I'm glad that they're making Sting appear a whole lot more during their episode, excited to see what'll happen in NoC.

 

[Leviathan]

How about that PPV last night, guys? I really hope Sting is okay. :( Rollins and Cena put on a great fight, though!

 

[Captain Gizmo]

Yea, when Sting avoided the clothesline and collapsed, I knew something was wrong. Overall, NoC was pretty decent. I enjoyed it. Was kinda hoping for a bigger teammate to help Ambrose and Reigns tho xD. But always good to see Jericho, great performer in ring and on the mic. I hope he's not back to job tho..

 

[Kirestananderson01]

Who are your favourite current superstars?
The Undertaker & John cena

What are your favourite memories as a kid?
Seeing the Undertaker headlining Smackdown

Do you own any of the DVD's of the old PPV's?
I own Wrestlemania 24, The Rock's biography

 

[Leviathan]

Anyone excited for Lesnar's Go To Hell tour? I don't know what to make of him fighting Big Show. The things I'm following right now are the New Day's usual heelish shenanigans (please god don't let Cena royally bury them if they are going for the US Title) and this new Rollins vs a very Jerkyll & Hyde inspired Kane; smiling, helpful business man come giant red machine. It's hella cheesy, but when Kane 'dragged' Rollins to hell this past Raw, I marked out!