• Our software update is now concluded. You will need to reset your password to log in. In order to do this, you will have to click "Log in" in the top right corner and then "Forgot your password?".
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.
    Register

PC WiFi Tournament

shedinjask

all about how to pokemoning
    • 765
    Posts
    17
    Years
    Wait what.

    He could have switched to avoid Flash. That's like banning Perish Song. I think if you're going to go ahead with banning it you should put a note in the op about it, since no one plays evasion clause that way.
     
    Dark Azelf

    Dark Azelf

    ☽𖤐☾𓃶𐕣
    • 7,210
    Posts
    16
    Years
    • Seen today
    shedinjask said:
    Wait what.

    He could have switched to avoid Flash. That's like banning Perish Song. I think if you're going to go ahead with banning it you should put a note in the op about it, since no one plays evasion clause that way.
    Click to expand...

    This is correct, its only moves that effect YOURSELF, Double Team, Minimize etc.


    Flash, Sand Attack are NOT banned, unlike the above, you can influence Flash and Sand Attack NOT to make your move inaccurate. There is a move, a very mystical secret move, the art of "switching" ever heard of it ?.

    Its basically a way of Psuedo Hazing aswell.
     
    Alakazam17

    Alakazam17

    [b]Long time no see![/b]
    • 5,641
    Posts
    18
    Years
    I was always under the impression that Evasion Clause include Sand-Attack and Flash, as the clause states that "any move that alters the ability to hit the foe" is banned. Whether it's increasing your own evasiveness or lowering the opponent's accuracy, this is the same thing.

    But I believe just stating the clauses is not good enough, heh. When I find the time, I'll edit the first post explaining each one, including Evasion Clause. I was intending to do this at some point, XD.
     

    Kuro

    Cloaked by the Masses
    • 160
    Posts
    17
    Years
    Zam, seriously. Make it clear in the first post. It's easy to mis-read, as I did.

    Anyway, confirming loss to Ooka. Good game, man. I only wish I hadn't given my Rhyperior a CB, or I would've gone all Avalanche on you. >_<
     
    Ooka

    Ooka

    [font=Maven Pro][color=#A75EE2]Cosmic[/color][/fon
    • 2,626
    Posts
    16
    Years
    Yeah, GG, I was hesitating on using DD, because I didn't know if it was Banded or not, but after seeing what it did to my Slug, I figured it was.
     

    Volkner's Apprentice

    PC Veteran Prize Fighter
    • 1,727
    Posts
    18
    Years
    Not looking forward to facing Ooka if I get by Alex..if I win it'll be a close call. We'll probably have our battle later in the week like I did last time, I have a track meet tomorrow and some work to do fixing up our basement. I'll start Pokemon training Wednesday and be ready by Friday.

    Oh and yes, making the first posts clear would be excellent. We had a confusion during my first round about sleep clause.
     

    shedinjask

    all about how to pokemoning
    • 765
    Posts
    17
    Years
    That's not how people generally define evasion clause (and really shouldn't be) but it's your tourney. I think a rematch is in order though.
     

    Matt-O

    The King's Shadow
    • 549
    Posts
    16
    Years
    Mr. Roboto and I should battle in a few minutes. Hopefully I'll be okay without Garchomp. He's the one that killed Zam so we'll see.

    I beat Mr.Roboto. 5-6 Very good game.
     
    Last edited:
    Alakazam17

    Alakazam17

    [b]Long time no see![/b]
    • 5,641
    Posts
    18
    Years
    I think he means 1-0, Ooka. I've seen a few people do the ratios in how many were fainted, rather than howmany remained.
     
    Ooka

    Ooka

    [font=Maven Pro][color=#A75EE2]Cosmic[/color][/fon
    • 2,626
    Posts
    16
    Years
    Oh, that makes sense :P

    I'm curious, why is it that on the "Users viewing this thread" section, your and Xairmo's names have a + beside them?
     

    Xairmo

    G-String Grandmas, tonight on Sick, Sad World
    • 2,644
    Posts
    16
    Years
    Ooka said:
    Oh, that makes sense :P

    I'm curious, why is it that on the "Users viewing this thread" section, your and Xairmo's names have a + beside them?
    Click to expand...

    My name doesnt has a + ._. Yours does though :P Maybe we can't see our own + marks
     

    Cloud_85

    Templar Patriarch
    • 322
    Posts
    16
    Years
    Hey Bill, I have some troubles... MY first team run a Garchomp, and the second one more that one legend T_T. And It's hard find a time with _Prince_. He's up in the mornings, which is like 12:00 AM on his country and 6:00 AM in mine T_T
     
    Alakazam17

    Alakazam17

    [b]Long time no see![/b]
    • 5,641
    Posts
    18
    Years
    Have you guys never had friend lists before? XD anyone on your list gets a "+" next to their name, and of course you can't put yourself on your own friends list. =P

    And to Cloud_85, unfortunately I guess you're going to have to edit one of the teams, >>. As for the battle time, what about the weekend? Perhaps you and _Prince_ can find a time that you're both willing to aim for?
     

    Volkner's Apprentice

    PC Veteran Prize Fighter
    • 1,727
    Posts
    18
    Years
    Since I'm bored I'm going to try to predict the final 6 starting with the 2nd round winners, ha.

    Fat Lucario
    Cloud_85
    Tortured_Soul
    Loto
    winner of POKEMASTERALEX VS Ryan24
    Ooka
    evilcheese
    Mo Man
    Xairmo
    Lumine
    Lady Nicole
    Richard Lynch

    Final 6 (provided they don't run into each other)
    Tortured_Soul
    Richard Lynch
    Lumine
    Mo Man
    Ooka
    Winner of Alex/Ryan (heh, ok so maybe it's a stretch.)

    No reason I didn't pick Lady Nicole, for all I know she could win this again. It's sure to happen that some of the favorites are going to clash in round 3, sooner than expected.

    Hey Bill, maybe instead of having the 3rd round go from 12 to 6, you could give free passes to members who have won two fights already, send four people straight to the QFs and have the other 8 duke it out in round 3. Then we'd have a solid Quarter-Final round! =D
     
    You must log in or register to reply here.
    Back
    Top