• Ever thought it'd be cool to have your art, writing, or challenge runs featured on PokéCommunity? Click here for info - we'd love to spotlight your work!
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

PC WiFi Tournament

Well, as most of you know by now, Garchomp has become Uber. Therefore, he will be banned from this tournament until further notice.

And don't yell at me about it. If you do, however, find a legit person to yell at, please let me know so I can join you. =D

Well Bill...you can be a nice person and chat with me, or...you can yell at me. It was mainly Dark_Azelf, Anti-Pop, Myself and sims796 with the arguments.

~T_S
 
Oh, XD. I thought it was Smogon.

I am more annoyed than angry, XD. (Plus the fact that my new team centered around Garchomp). But alas, I'll see how it goes....and it of course gives me incentive to try an Uber team.

Oh, speaking of which....Wobbuffet is now allowed in the tournament, and Speed Deoxys will be able to count as your one legendary. Expect these announcements in big font on the front page. ^^
 
*coughandmecough*

Anyways, Kuro was on today, and I sent him/her a pm, but I didn't get an answer. Just figured I'd say that for the record.
 
what garchomp a uber? please tell me your kidding he is on my team! and i was just about to battle today.
 
Well, please everyone don't start a big outburst about how we ruined your teams. The fact is Garchomp has no real counters, so we have to take him out and see if it balances the metagame.
 
And Ooka....:P

Fact is, Ooka is right. If you all took the time to read the thread posted by SU in the Announcements then you would see what we mean. Besides, it is only for a month to see how it impacts on the Metagame.

~T_S
 
My opponent used flash in our battle which is a violation to the rules. = evasion clause. That should be a default win for me. Even though it d/c'd when i was up 4-3. So i win.
 
Me and FL Seemed To have had a Communication error, not sure if he turned off the power or if he was too far from the Wi-Fi Connection. Or an error on NWi-Fi. I didn't turn off the power and my bar lines were 2.

Edit: Flash is against evasion clause? No, Evasion clause is increase of evasivness, not decrease of Accuracy. So I don't think it's against the rules. Plus I didn't turn off the Power.
 
Me and FL Seemed To have had a Communication error, not sure if he turned off the power or if he was too far from the Wi-Fi Connection. Or an error on NWi-Fi. I didn't turn off the power and my bar lines were 2.
I was at full connection, either way I SHOULD HAVE dc'd on you since you broke the evasion clause. I win period.

KThxbai

Edit: Here it is in the rules...

3. All basic clauses will be in effect. That's Sleep, Evasion, OHKO, & Hax Item Clauses.

And why the hell would gaining accuracy up be a violation... Wow... ITS DECREASING ACCURACY.
 
Evasive clause is alot more of Evasiveness change. Why would Change of Accuracy count against Violation of Evasive Clause? It doesn't make any sense.
 
Evasive clause is alot more of Evasiveness change. Why would Change of Accuracy count against Violation of Evasive Clause? It doesn't make any sense.
Its called if you use it 6 times i could barely hit you...
 
Evasion Clause is for all moves that effect the ability of moves to hit. This means Double Team, Flash etc. The only move(s) allowed to do so are Accupuncture, (since the stat increase is random) and Metronome causing Double Team, Flash, Accupuncture etc.

~T_S
 
o_0. Now you're abusing. I used flash 2 times and you could still hit me. It was in battle so it was smooth in the beginning. Untill Somehow the internet pop up of Accuracy loos is against Evasive clause appears. What a load of non sense Bologne Shower. Either and error or not, there was no Rule Violation Here.


Edit: Ok TS Said it is against rules. But I still have my doubts.
 
Alrighty then. I'll be back for the next Tourny. Please don't make me do preliminations as It would not be obvious that Accuracy change would violate the clause.
 
Back
Top