I'm a heteroromantic omnidemisexual.

What are your romantic/sexual preferences? If you're not the all-inclusive fellow, what do you think about those you aren't attracted to? Any reason why you like those you do or dislike those you don't?


The title being my most specific self-description, I'll fuck anything that can fuck, but I'll only have women to date, please. Men are dogs to me and I am no exception, though because I am a demisexual as well I have a really hard time with my gayness, to be honest. Still, I'm one hell of a romantic, though. Date me.

I'm asexual, and have been since my early teens. That's self-explanatory really, so I don't need to go into detail.

I don't know if I'm aromantic or demiromantic because I've never let anyone get close enough to me to find out if it'd make a difference, and I have no plans to. I suppose I might as well be aromantic for all intents and purposes, as my personality means that even if I were demiromantic and formed an attachment to someone, I would never allow myself to act on it. In fact, I'd probably cut myself off from the person for my own safety.

I'm a heteroromantic heterosexual I think. I've only dated girls and only feel sexually attracted to girls. I'm really generic in that bit. I can find guys attractive, but not in a sexual or romantic way. It's just that pretty people are pretty people. I don't know if I'd be able to date a transexual, I completely accept them as people (Damn, that sounds already disrespecting, I have a hard time wording this :/), but I don't know if I'd be ready to date one.

I'm a heteromantic heterosexual as well. I've personally only felt attracted to girls. However, for some reason I'm this one guy who will never get attracted to anything unless that particular person passes through a very specific set of criterion, so basically every girl I feel attracted to looks almost the same as well as is somewhat of a "gamer." I don't know why my mind works like this but it does cause nearly all the girls I've been attracted to possess the same skillset.

I used to give it to men in the ass and now the thought of engaging in sex utterly repulses me. Take that as you may.

kids these days

I'm straight

I'm a heterodextrous indyplatonic ambivertoromantic. But who knows for how long that will last!

Pikachu said:

I'm a heterodextrous indyplatonic ambivertoromantic. But who knows for how long that will last!

Click to expand...

With all due respect, what in God's name does that mean?

Unless it's a slight, in which case nevermind. I'm not that interested in the specifics of intolerance.

What the hell is wrong with me? I just thought that heteromantic heterosecal meant straight without even looking it up. Well to make it even more clear I'll use simple words that I understand, I'm straight.

Senusret said:

With all due respect, what in God's name does that mean?

Unless it's a slight, in which case nevermind. I'm not that interested in the specifics of intolerance.

Click to expand...

It's complicated, but I think it fits me well. I can call myself by any labels I want, can I not? :) or are there official ones written down somewhere that you have to prove to others that you fit into?

Hetero-everything for me. I do admire beauty in other women, however.

I don't have much criteria in what I find attractive in people, but my big one is that I feel men need to be masculine and women need to be feminine. I cringe when I see a man stand with his feet facing inwards in the same way I cringe when I watch a woman walk (or sit for that matter) with her legs wide.

Pikachu said:

It's complicated, but I think it fits me well. I can call myself by any labels I want, can I not? :) or are there official ones written down somewhere that you have to prove to others that you fit into?

Click to expand...

The purpose of abstraction (language) is to provide meaning that can be understood by others. In this case you're using language to illustrate a point against conventional labels for romanticism and sexuality. I can't conjure why. But I will say that it's a matter of understanding, not convincing, that language gets its power from.

Chocolate™ said:

What the hell is wrong with me? I just thought that heteromantic heterosecal meant straight without even looking it up. Well to make it even more clear I'll use simple words that I understand, I'm straight.

Click to expand...

Protip: The title is half-serious. Don't get too bent out of shape over something that you yourself say is nonapplicable.

lol, once again PC has become Batman and is 100% fucking srs about everything. I should do some work to lighten this place up, it's so gloomy. I might have to become the Joker to do that, shit. lmao

I dream of a world where we no longer have to, nor bother, defining sexual preferences. It's mundane, exclusive, and backward. I've fucked more women than guys, why do I need a title to attribute to it?

I don't care who you are, what you like or how ugly you might have been, but if I like you, I'll like you! :D There's no boundaries. =P

I like a woman's bodyshape a lot more then a man, but men look funner to hug, so I dunno. I'm torn. xD I'm not really sexually attracted, I just like faces and elegance. =D

Chocolate™ said:

What the hell is wrong with me? I just thought that heteromantic heterosecal meant straight without even looking it up. Well to make it even more clear I'll use simple words that I understand, I'm straight.

Click to expand...

Wait, what, it doesn't? Man I don't understand all these sexual preference terms. Can't we just make two groups: Fuckable, and Under-Age?

MorallyIncorrect said:

Wait, what, it doesn't? Man I don't understand all these sexual preference terms. Can't we just make two groups: Fuckable, and Under-Age?

Click to expand...

honestly I just exclaimed zoinks irl

I'm straight. Some girls I find attractive, some girls I don't. All depends on their looks and personality.

Sometimes I stop and think "Did our forefathers really die in the wars to protect our right to identify as a demiromantic asexual? Maybe they shouldn't have. Maybe it'd be better if Germany won. You know, within reason. Like they had to stop killing people, obviously."

I'm straight. haven't really ever seriously questioned it either.

abnegation said:

I dream of a world where we no longer have to, nor bother, defining sexual preferences. It's mundane, exclusive, and backward. I've fucked more women than guys, why do I need a title to attribute to it?

Click to expand...

Explain to me how a lack of conventional definition to these preferences would help things. I have the idea that at heart people are naturally all-loving and limit themselves but that's another story.

It sounds so elegant but I don't understand the logical appeal.

Sodom said:

Sometimes I stop and think "Did our forefathers really die in the wars to protect our right to identify as a demiromantic asexual? Maybe they shouldn't have. Maybe it'd be better if Germany won. You know, within reason. Like they had to stop killing people, obviously."

Click to expand...

Quit it XD