5th Gen Bianca or Cheren? Which was harder?

[Dave666]

Neither was hard for me, but i think bianca was better than cheren

 

[Disko_Rock]

As for Cheren... well... he has Liepard. Enough said.

lol

Bianca's team has more bulk (and cuteness) imo and that makes her a little harder than Cheren who seems to be speed and/or power.

 

[kevcrash]

Cheren was harder for me because Bianca's only tough team member was Musharna.

 

[Avizion]

Hands down Cheren, the Musharna was capable of tanking a hit or two but in return it couldn't do much at all, I don't know if Samurott is just naturally bulky but that big doggy of her didn't put up much of a fight.

 

[Webdemon]

Cheren for me was a tad tedious...Mainly because of his damn Gigalith and his stupid stealth rock! I didn't have a spinner to get rid of the frikkin rocks. It was hard times for my Houndoom and Crobat...Hard times indeed.

 

[jacktheninjadude]

[SIZE="a"]Not meaning to be harsh or anything but Bianca will always have a type matchup weakness to your starter pokemon and most of her other pokemon that cause threat can easily be stamped out with fighting and dark moves.. So having an emboar that knows a fire, dark and fighting moves will be a boss against her.

Cheren has a type matchup strength and will always be harder throughout the game in my experience[/SIZE]

 

[DarkLordEon]

They were both easier, but i found cheren a bit more harder.

 

[Cherrim]

I think Bianca usually gave me more problems because my Pokémon were always better type machups for Cheren, but I don't think I ever once lost to either of them, haha.

 

[DarkLordEon]

I lost to cheren once forgot to heal straight after a gym battle.

 

[TwiDragon]

Nah, they go down easy. Bianca is easy because shes always lower leveled and Cheren is also easy because I have something to counter out everything of his.

 

[Seki]

Definitely Cheren for me. He has higher leveled pokemon.

 

[shinysweety]

Cheren. I never lost against any of them, but Cheren was harder for me since his pokemon were a higher level.

 

[Air Pichu]

Honestly, they were both kind of easy since they used kinda weak Pokemon (Really Cheren? Liepard?). But I had a harder time with Cheren anyway because I had a hard time with his starter. He became really challenging once he moved to the Victory Road because of his Haxorus then.

 

[blue]

Yeh, I found Bianca's Stoutland a tough cookie.

 

[Tsutarja]

Neither were a challenge to me since I always kept the Pokémon in my party above level most of the time, but if I had to say, Cheren was a tougher challenge for me.

 

[AresHuls]

Now i am playing with an all dark team, Cheren is slightly strongewr

 

[Spades Slick]

To be honest,the strongest "rival" figure in the game is N, but between those two, Cheren
Bianca is, well, weaker. It's very easy to beat her

 

[PumpkinOrange]

There wasn't a huge difference in the difficulty between both Cheren and Bianca.. but for me Cheren was harder, his Pokémon were higher levels, not to mention that his starter always had the advantage over mine.

 

[slowmotion]

I didn't really have problems with either of them, but if I had to choose, I'd say Cheren was harder. Bianca's Musharna was always easy for my Emboar with flamethrower, and I have a reasonably strong Stoutland, so I know it's strengths and weaknesses.

 

[miakalina]

Cheren was harder than Bianca. Bianca was easy.
I think it was just that Cheren was more annoying than Bianca. xD