• Our friends from the Johto Times are hosting a favorite Pokémon poll - and we'd love for you to participate! Click here for information on how to vote for your favorites!
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

Film End of the Sequel-pocalypse?

  • 10,682
    Posts
    15
    Years
    https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/hollywoods-new-problem-sequels-moviegoers-899765

    "2016 has proven to be a very tough battleground, and the landscape has been littered with a series of sequels that have come up short, and thus call into question the entire notion of the inherent appeal of non-original, franchise-based content."

    It seems as if studios are rethinking the idea of throwing out sequels that no one asked for. Do you think they'll follow through on this? Is it a good move if they do?
     
    Bit odd how they referred to The Jungle Book as an 'original tentpole' when it isn't any different to the Ghostbusters reboot - an updated movie cashing in on the name appeal meant to kickstart a new franchise altogether.

    They industry is probably gonna wait to see how Disney fares this year before really deciding to feel the pressure - the superhero & Pixar movies are always consistent Scrooge McDuck money vaults for Disney and the industry as a whole, so if this sequelitis strain does end up affecting those prospects, then they'll really feel a bit of fear.

    Any slowing down of the sequel machine is welcomed. But I think it is likely that this is just a lull in the storm - if they do decide to rethink their methods, it'll just be a matter of time until sequels galore are found to be profitable. I think something like this happened at the end of the '80s, when the first era of Sequels Everywhere started to wear thin on the general public. It's just a matter of waiting out the indifference/outright intolerance.
     
    It's probably not the end of unnecessary sequels yet. There are a lot of reboots and shared universe movies lined up for the next 2-3 years, it's inevitable that we'll end up going back to this unnecessary sequel phase as soon as one of those strikes gold.
     
    Unnecessary sequels will exist as long as it turns a profit. It's unfortunate that money is more important than artistic integrity, but at the end of the day it is a business.
     
    Where were these people when original movies like Transcendence and Interstellar didn't get many nominations at the Oscars? If they're so worried about the Sequel-pocalypse, then they shouldn't be nominating them.
     
    Back
    Top