- 559
- Posts
- 19
- Years
- Seen Oct 1, 2008
MissingNo. will evolve into Mystrync, yes? Did I spell that right?
Fangking Omega said:Vulpi, could you tell us what's wrong exactly with these Pokémon? We've tried to design them so that they follow standard Pokémon convention, and the names are meant to be both relevant to the Pokémon themselves and spoken in a way that rolls off the tongue effectively. It's a difficult and time consuming process...
Well, can't you still rate the cards, surely?Ok, the truth is, that I don't really like fake Pokemon. This isn't wrong, that you made cards with these Pokemon, but I only accept only oryginal Pokemon from games, that's all
vulpi said:Ok, the truth is, that I don't really like fake Pokemon. This isn't wrong, that you made cards with these Pokemon, but I only accept only oryginal Pokemon from games, that's all ;)
Fangking Omega said:Well that's a very narrow minded view; you're limiting other people's creativity. We're thinking outside the box here. It's like saying "no you can't use that blank, they don't exist in the real TCG."
We're not just average fakers making crappy low grade fake Pokémon that look completely wrong as Pokémon and with stupid names like "Dragonsaur" and "Firecat" or something (Cascade certainly isn't! He's the best Pokémon designer around IMO, should be working for Nintendo! :p). I've seen some awful fake Pokémon out there. However, we're trying to make it as close to actual design style as we possibly can, while doing bringing something completely original to the game.
You shouldn't write them off just because they're made up Pokémon. You should award them on their merits :)