Nice, but why does peoples keep bringing up Wobby & Garchomps? Wobby is debatable, and Garchomp is clearly uber as it is superior to OU and UU. The more important thing is the Lati@s, whom i think are clearly fit for OU, and would just be at the stronger end of the ability scale, with all other dragons & T-tar etc. The prblem is people who don't want to face strong pokes, but as far as i can see, if you're one of those, go UU, as they are usually weaker (although some are quite good if you play them right). And everyone who says they would bring more variety to the game has an outstanding point, as there aren't really any specific Dragon Walls, although Dragonite with the right nature could be one, and most Dragons are mainly physical, unlike Latios, who is a special attacker, and more like the psychic side of his family. So, realy they would make the game more exciting, and are cool as.
Garchomp is still debateable and so far I don't see many good points for its exclusion from OU, other than "test it and we'll see the results".
Latios' sets are inferior to the common dragons and is generally outclassed by Salamence due to the lack of a fire move. I don't see Latios having a negative impact on the metagame except people would run more Bronzongs/Metagrosses or something.
Latias hasn't been extensively tested but it would be a Cresselia with more SpA (and Draco Meteor =D) if it were to run a special walling set, and would be inferior if it ran Latios' offensive sets.
UU is meant to create a balanced metagame for the lower tier pokemon to function in. It is not a tier for "weak pokemon" or "I don't want to face strong pokemons". People play UU for added fun of playing with pokemon that would otherwise be unviable in OU.
I strongly feel that the reason why people would unban
Lati@s is because of the advent of a new metagame, and therefore they cannot go by the rules of the old standard as Advance is very different from D/P. It is not to add variety in the choices of pokemon as almost all the sets are inferior to current OU pokemon one way or another. Physical Pursuit and stuff like that nerf
Lati@s in D/P, so they are being considered for unbanning.
No Dragon Walls? Noone remembers BulkyMence =(
Dragons are not suited to be walls due to their stats being catered to the offensive rather than defensive and common Ice Beam weakness hurts a lot.
Unbanning
Lati@s would not add more variety to the game, neither will it see the advent of a new fearsome Special Attacker Dragon (which is vastly inferior to Salamence =*) It is just to show that Advance rules do not neccessarily apply in D/P, and to correct any wrongs in the tier list. So far, Smogon has suggested ditching the BL list altogether and starting from scratch, because of the massive changes that D/P brought.
(BTW, the Psychic type got seriously nerfed in D/P)