Your logic confuses me. You think by helping the rationals, I'm somehow a threat to the Rationals? Thats... do I dare say it?... Irrational.
Let's review. The grounds for my bandwagon are as follows: I'm on the list of five that we know for certain contains one Irrational, everyone agreed with me yesterday on the whole 1/2 is dead point, and, quote, "I've got a feeling". I won't even give the latter point the dignity of being reviewed, so I'll skip it and address the first two.
The list of five has one Irrational in it: gee whiz, yesterday, we had a list of fifteen with at least three Irrationals in it, and now we have a list of five with one Irrational in it. Our odds of picking correctly have increased dramatically, right? Math, people, math. We had a 1/5 chance before (now slightly improved with the loss of Detox) whereas with this list... we still have a 1/5 chance.
I was agreed with yesterday: I'm not denying that I was agreed with yesterday, but according to Ninja Aiden's post, this is going to help the Rationals. So... if the presumptions made by this accusation are true, then lynching me is supposed to help the Rationals?
We've got the 1/5 from yesterday's list, or we could try the greater than or equal to 25% chance from voting for someone not on the list. I understand that saying this is basically me saying "Don't vote for me!" but logic triumphs all, right?
Oh, who am I kidding.
[OVERWRITE] Bacteriophage
I fail to see how you get 'this will not help the Rationals' from 'but will that'
Oh, now I get it. Whoops. Let me go ahead and strikeout my vote.
I'll just go ahead and say that I am a role-less inno and I have a virus, which was given to me last night. At this point, I'll probably use it on someone in the list, so that we might have a list of four people we can trust. It might overwrite me, but I'm willing to take that chance.