Wow, like that already hasn't been answered by a million-and-one members that act as if the information they hold was some secret unknown to mankind of how-to become a mod, XD.JKaizer said:I think he was talking about the original focus of the thread. XD
That would be a good idea, except people may delete their own threads, after a few people posted in them, and then people would be like "My 1 post is gone! I want it backkkk!!!" But other than that, that would be cool/...amphros23 said:I had an Idea where better members that arent really qualified to be mods but are still good members could be "Super-Members" And this would imply like moving, locking, delting or editing your own threads, and just your own. Anyway, just an idea.
Yea but they could just get the Mod of that forum or some one higher to move the thread.amphros23 said:I had an Idea where better members that arent really qualified to be mods but are still good members could be "Super-Members" And this would imply like moving, locking, delting or editing your own threads, and just your own. Anyway, just an idea.
But if you give members Mod powers even in their own threads then they can open it if a Mod locks it.amphros23 said:Well, if their thread get locks or someone makes a bad post then you could delete it and problem solved. Also, It gives mods less to worry about.
Arcanine said:But if you give members Mod powers even in their own threads then they can open it if a Mod locks it.
amphros23 said:I know that is possible but you would have the same type of procedure when picking a moderator. If they seem like they can follow the rules then you would give it to them
Very true, that is pretty useless....Castrainer said:And...? Whast the big diference between these and mods? XD
Sorry, but members are fine the way theyre now =\
We're not talking about president right now....blue said:Unless people voted for a member that was mod worthy?