bobandbill
7.8/10 too much water
- 17,246
- Posts
- 17
- Years
- land
- Seen yesterday
Woah nelly, slow down there...I never noticed the truck in R/B/Y. I just noticed it in Hoenn since it stood out so much.
Still. Not a fan of how high-tech it's becoming :s
Firstly - hi-tech in what manner? Is it the visuals, or the content, or both? Seems you're jumping to and fro...
Anyways, - you dislike how high-tech...it's becoming? As said this isn't something terribly new in Pokemon- you know, the game where you capture animals in devices and can transfer them back and forth to a computer storage system? That sounds rather hi-tech in the first place, and the introduction of a truck or car... doesn't change that. (If anything the car probably came first and seems to be established since R/B/Y - not only was there a truck there is also references to an old man saying he remembers the moon landing to the exact date... and logically a car would be invented before a small device which fits in your pocket that can contain huge monsters within them - certainly is the case irl. =P)
Furthermore there's the more obvious example of transport, the Magnet (Maglev) Train in GSC which honestly screams more 'high technology' then a truck to me - this is something that runs on magnets and transports you to another region at astonishing speed. I don't really see how there being trucks in 5th gen is any more technologically advanced than previous games. (Note that it is implied GSC/HGSS takes place the same time if not just before D/P/Pt, and RBY is thought by many to be around RSE's time slot). Never mind the high-class boats. In short, I just really can't see where you are going with this 'Pokemon has lost their feel' in this regard because it really is nothing new or amazing - if anything it's less impressive than other things before.
This sounds more a complaint with both plot (and who knows what the plot with B&W will be? The potential for a ying-and-yang theme though excites me more than 3rd/4th gen's plot) and the visuals here. On the former I'll note that there was no 'praising' of the legendaries going on in D/P/Pt, just a guy in charge of a large group whole manipulated them and wanted to use those legendaries for his own means. Rather different... (but you said you only played up to the fourth gym? Which probably explain it...) And the visuals part is down to personal opinion but doesn't actually change that much of th gameplay IMO (and certainly not the Lighthouse having a 3D part - you experience that for what, 5 seconds max if you go 'this isn't pretty imo' and just walk inside again). There's a difference between not liking the graphics and the 'feel' of the game changing, which wouldn't be due to 3D being used thanks to Game Freak making use of the DS's capabilities.I'll never finish Pearl because it's just too Sci-Fi'ish (evil team wanting to wipe out Earth or w/e and praising space demi-Gods). I never liked the 3D lighthouse in HGSS either, so having 3D towns is really going to kill the "fun" I'll have playing. Not a fan of those graphics.
Hard to gauge with pre-release (by half a year thereabouts-good chance it's fair beta like certain pre-dp pics were to an extent) tbh. And on a previous not on the NPCs looking the same -besides repeating the 'it's may be beta', they've been reusing the same over-world (and battle) sprites since R/B/Y. =/ Sure it might seem a touch more obvious there, but I can't say businessmen looking like each other in an alley in one part of the game is exactly terrible in my view. *shrugs*The characters look flat, too.
![]()
Everything else is 3D but the characters look flat lol It's really awkward o_o Like Paper Mario (only, Paper Mario was awesome.)
And again - bar the very odd picture all we have really seen is the city - which'd obviously be busier and more modern than smaller towns, etc. Still feel this judgement is given about a touch prematurely, is all.