fenyx4
HOENN CONFIRMED!
- 1,761
- Posts
- 16
- Years
- Stuck in Generation 3 :(
- Seen Jul 23, 2017
My problem is with seeing them every five seconds from other trainers, and that it's a ridiculous name.
THIS. That's why I get a bit irked whenever people just say "Rename the Pokemon." Sure, I can rename my Pokemon, but what about all the other Trainers sprawled across Unova with Sawk and Throh in their parties? Just merely being subject to the sentence "Pokemon Trainer _______ sent out Sawk/Throh!" will likely make me cringe. It's quite easy to change the given name for a single instance of Pokemon, but to hear a horrendous term that is the identifying label for an entire species? That's what I dislike.
And not only do you have to see it in Unova forests, buildings, caves, waters, and such, you also have to see crappy names in the Battle Subway as well and on Wi-Fi.
And online in discussions and forums.
And in the PokeDex and research articles/informative pages such as those on Bulbapedia. I mean, it's like I want to change the crappy names, but no matter how many Pokemon I rename, the entirety of the species will be known as [insert crappy Pokemon name here] forever. I think that's why most people want the names to be good on the first go, so that whenever you see that name, you'll either range from "A Pokemon. Neat." or "That name is so freaking awesome." I don't want to have to go "WHHHHHHYYYYYYYYYYYY DID THEY PICK SUCH A TERRIBLE NAME" every time I see a Sawk or a Throh (though at this point, I probably will be doing that for a long time, as I suspect other Trainers may do).
I can do one member of each species some good with the Name Rater's involvement, but I can't say the same for the rest of the Sawk and Throh in the world. At the end of the day, yeah, it's just a name, but there's a reason the name was chosen in the first place. And if names have to be assigned to something, can they at least be average/good so as not to induce cringe-worthy thoughts and memories?
...as for Roggenrola, that name is awesome. :D It's not overly blatant, because I've seen a few posts where people didn't even recognize the "rock and roll" pun at first - I'm one of them. I still have a LOT of reviewing to do on Pokemon names, item names, location names, and Trainer names in the future within this thread, but as of right now, Sawk, Throh, Foongus, and Amoongus are the only Gen 5 names standing out as being way too blatant/obvious to me to the point that they're terrible.