JX Valentine
Your aquatic overlord
- 3,277
- Posts
- 20
- Years
- Harassing Bill
- Seen Aug 19, 2020
Why would logic fit into Creativity and Interesting or anything for that matter?
Yes, logic is an important part of writing, and I'm hoping you're not saying it isn't. (I might have misread what you were trying to get at.) If you can't explain how X, Y, and Z happen, you end up with plot holes. Plot holes are bad things because, frankly, they tend to be glaringly obvious and detract from the enjoyability of the story. For example, back to the Team Rocket bit, your reader ends up questioning why Team Rocket didn't just die on the spot. They'll assume you're copping out or are just too insane to create a believable story. Your story will be taken less seriously if you fail to fill in those plot holes, so if you're actually trying to write a serious story, this is just going to hurt what you're trying to pass off. Thus, unless you're writing crack, things like the laws of physics I brought up in the example are just going to generate plot holes and result in a decline of general quality.
Unfortunately, if a judge doesn't know the basic rules to a fandom that might not be shared by other universes (like the fact that Team Rocket never dies), they're going to mistake those things that are just a given to the writer as plot holes.
So, yeah, that's basically my problem in a nutshell. Failure to understand the basics of a fandom = what looks like a plot hole to the reader. I'm worried that that will be a problem.
Edit: That and I'm saying that I really hope you're thinking of including quality (and all the things that fit under that umbrella category) as one of the things you're judging a fic on, rather than just "Did this fic keep us interested?" and "Did this fic meet all the requirements?" Because I personally think if you just stop at those two questions, you'll come up with a crapload of potential winners for each challenge because it's fairly easy to meet both requirements. Yes, I realize you just said you'd include it. But again, logic would fit under the quality category (not the creativity/interest category), and you seemed to imply in your scoring proposal a couple posts back that you were leaving that out (or that creativity/interest would be covering it).
Last edited: