• Ever thought it'd be cool to have your art, writing, or challenge runs featured on PokéCommunity? Click here for info - we'd love to spotlight your work!
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.
    Register

PC WiFi Tournament

Name said:
Count me off the tournament, I've lost my wi-fi forever
Click to expand...

:shocked: Omg really!? How come? What happened to it? But you're such a good battler! That's a shame :(
 
is it too late to sign up for the next torney or no?? if so I would liek to join... if so option 1...
 
I'll vote no legends, if legends were to be allowed in this tourney later on then I'm out.
 
PC seems to have a problem with allowing non-uber legends, One needs to understand the metagame. Moltres and articuno are not that great, stealth rock damages them significantly, azelf is taken down as easily than you think you could e.g suckerpunch or pursuit. Heatran has a common weakness 4x ground, 2x fighting and water. Out of the legendary dogs/cats one would realise that enti is not that great whilst Suicune and Raikou are countable, people who say calmcune is hard to beat, I myself use Suicune sometimes and I know what counters it, it's not that hard. Celebi? Will what can we say about celebi? Just look how many weaknesses it has. The regi's have nothing special in them. We can have second thoughts about allowing Suicune, cresseila and Jirachi or maybe even azelf if people are too concerned about them. Other non-uber legends should be allowed.

Besides there are pokemon like Garchomp, Salamence, T-Tar and Metagross who are far better than most legends I mentioned above. If you are complaining about power wise, I don't see you lot complaining about these lot. So what's the problem?
 
Last edited:
Don't talk about Pursuit and Sucker Punch, even Mewtwo can be taken down by the right Pokemon using them...

Just because Legends like the trios suck, doesn't mean a Jolly, Swords Passing Celebi should be allowed. And don't say "Ninjask is better" because 2 Bullet Punches from a Metagross kills Ninjask. Now you'll probably say "Scizor is better" but Scizor Gets killed by any Fire Attack. The basic Celebi can take an X Scizzor from Weavile and have time to Baton Pass still. They're legends for a reason, so you shouldn't single out the sucky ones as the reason they should be allowed.

Metagross=Low Speed
Garchomp=4x Weakness to Ice
Salamence=^
Tyrannitar=4x Weakness to Fighting

Of course you'll probably say, Celebi has a 4x weakness to bug, but the difference is the base 100 in HP and both Defensive stats....
 
Why shouldn't I single out the sucky ones? If they are able to complete within this 'PC rules' I'll say without any problems. We can have a certain ban and allow some legends. So you got any issues with that Kazaam? Oh yeah you're right about celebi I personally don't like celebi it's very unpredictable and so on.
 
May I join? I feel I'll have my awesome team done by first match.

I vote second option too, I think Legends are kinda cheep. Even if they aren't ubers their stats are pretty good.

~desu Saba~
 
Cuz then that would kill my team. xD I don't really like legendaries overall. I don't know why, but they seem way too strong, even compared to those two. (well from what I've seen).

I just vote no legendaries...if that's still going on...

~desu Saba~
 
In which case, I'll vote for the allowance of non-Uber legendaries. They can be taken down as easily as most OU Pokemon with the right strategy, so what is there to complain about? Non-OU legendaries generally have no better stats than Electivire or Alakazam, so I see no point in banning them.
 
There is no point in arguing, heh. As I said before, we each have valid opinions, which is why I put this to a vote in the first place. Though I'm beginning to question whether that was a good idea or not, aiyh....

However, I'm glad that this is the only part of the new rules that is up for debate. XD
 
~Kazaam~ said:
I have decided that if non-uber legends get approved, I'm going to use a team of all Legends, just to show the people that let us use them why we shouldn't be allowed to....

I know it's a little childish, but they have to find out somehow....
Click to expand...

:\ And how exactly would that be fair to those of us who voted against it?
 
_Prince_ said:
PC seems to have a problem with allowing non-uber legends, One needs to understand the metagame. Moltres and articuno are not that great, stealth rock damages them significantly, azelf is taken down as easily than you think you could e.g suckerpunch or pursuit. Heatran has a common weakness 4x ground, 2x fighting and water. Out of the legendary dogs/cats one would realise that enti is not that great whilst Suicune and Raikou are countable, people who say calmcune is hard to beat, I myself use Suicune sometimes and I know what counters it, it's not that hard. Celebi? Will what can we say about celebi? Just look how many weaknesses it has. The regi's have nothing special in them. We can have second thoughts about allowing Suicune, cresseila and Jirachi or maybe even azelf if people are too concerned about them. Other non-uber legends should be allowed.

Besides there are pokemon like Garchomp, Salamence, T-Tar and Metagross who are far better than most legends I mentioned above. If you are complaining about power wise, I don't see you lot complaining about these lot. So what's the problem?
Click to expand...

..
in away a agree w/ utoo amny people peole (expecaily n00bs ) think all legends are uber and its annoying.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top