Pogiforce-14
EV/IV Trainer
- 6,159
- Posts
- 21
- Years
- Age 37
- Magma Colosseum
- Seen Feb 23, 2009
What, is that his effect? I wasn't aware he had one, as I've never seen one before.
Vagabond Aeon said:Mistys_brother: omg Tyrant Dragon. This calls for a Dragon deck... All I can say is get three Stamping Destructions and make good use of your dragons.
Well sorry to burst your bubble, but if that is the skill of the people in your hood you wouldn't be able to handle mine. the thing about that deck with the way you posted it suggests you depend solely on those two tributes and maybe the mudora. Which isn't that special anyway. the thing is, I've learned through experience to NEVER depend so much on any single strategy, as it's way too easy to be taken down. hvae multiple strategies in a deck. Mine, for example, is a combination beatdown/control deck. That way if the beatdown doesn't work, teh control backs itself up. Therefore my deck actually operates better because it backs itself. But you speed it all up just to have tributes available, and you waste your mosnter spaces that way. soul exchange, cost down, and other such cards are much meaner and don't require those weak little balls of light. And it also makes you less dependent on that single strategy. So you tribute two mystic shine balls for something. Okay, Trap hole, bottomless trap hole, book of moon then attack with my mystic swordsman level 4, magic cylinder the attack, then ring of destruction the monster then trap of board eraser so you have to discard a card too (a strategy I've performed several times). There are so many ways to get rid of those tributes, it isn't funny. And to build a deck solely depending on their strength is seriously flawed.Orochi Breakwing said:X_X....not trying to bash you or anything, but you seem like a player that lacks strategy. The shineballs are there to DIE obviously, because theyre a very easy boost for our little friend Mudora here. And on top of that, it depends on how and when you play it, as all cards do. SURE you wont wanna topdeck a shineball, nine times outta ten, but once you get a Venus out, all 3 are out of the way. Shining Angel is there to speed up THAT approach. And on top of that, MOST of the time you wouldnt want to topdeck a monster that needs a tribute, which is why 2 hi-level monsters in a deck > one. And In not "throwing" tributes in there, every monster, magic, and trap card has a reason for being in the deck, like Airknights ability to pick up the PACE in that deck if the need be. I ran this EXACT deck in YVD last night against some of my tournament-winning personal friends, and it went toe-to-toe with them, and it managed to WIN more than it LOST.
Pogiforce-14 said:Well sorry to burst your bubble, but if that is the skill of the people in your hood you wouldn't be able to handle mine. the thing about that deck with the way you posted it suggests you depend solely on those two tributes and maybe the mudora. Which isn't that special anyway. the thing is, I've learned through experience to NEVER depend so much on any single strategy, as it's way too easy to be taken down. hvae multiple strategies in a deck. Mine, for example, is a combination beatdown/control deck. That way if the beatdown doesn't work, teh control backs itself up. Therefore my deck actually operates better because it backs itself. But you speed it all up just to have tributes available, and you waste your mosnter spaces that way. soul exchange, cost down, and other such cards are much meaner and don't require those weak little balls of light. And it also makes you less dependent on that single strategy. So you tribute two mystic shine balls for something. Okay, Trap hole, bottomless trap hole, book of moon then attack with my mystic swordsman level 4, magic cylinder the attack, then ring of destruction the monster then trap of board eraser so you have to discard a card too (a strategy I've performed several times). There are so many ways to get rid of those tributes, it isn't funny. And to build a deck solely depending on their strength is seriously flawed.