I think that the way a gym leader gets replaeced should be:
1) inactivity after a period of time.
2) banned or breaking rules in PC.
3) retires/steps down from it.
I dont think a gym leader should be replaced by a champion. I mean... Ash doesnt replace any gym leader xD
Edit: Count me in for Fire.
Inactivity, yes. We should set a date. I wanna sayyyy, 1 week - 10 days without notice. Or, if they give notice so we can set up a substitute or something, maybe a month?
Banned or breaking rules; naturally.
Retire / Steps down - also yes, naturally.
And I don't think becoming champ should give you free reign to just kick out a leader or something either, but we should definitely keep track of champions, and take their success into account when scouting possible replacement leaders or substitutes for the league. I think below here, I'm gonna bring that up again - with an idea about inducting new league members.
Well, I'm not so concerned about challenger success as a criteria; aren't the challengers supposed to win in the end, anyway? If a Leader keeps losing, chances are the Leader will consider relinquishing the position themselves. At that point, people can bid for that Gym, and either change it to unused types or maintain the same type. The Gym can be "closed" while being prepared by the new Leader, giving seven badges available (or fewer!).
When I say challenger success, I refer both to offering successful and dedicated challengers spots on the league, based on their earning their way in; as well as - leaders not providing a challenge to those who would take on the league. We do have to remember to give fair opportunity for the league to develop and new people to get in. And we also have to be fair enough to not hold ourselves in positions that we want when we're clearly outmatched for those positions. A leader shouldn't be expected to win every match, because of course we don't want the league to be impossible. But we want the league to test players still, and as such, a leader which presents no challenge to anyone, may not be the best for the league. I think there should be something set up with a set number of consecutive losses (high; of course, because something earned like a spot on the league shouldn't be taken just by a few bad battles) such as; ten consecutive losses in a row to [different] challengers, or 5 losses in a row without a single knockout of a challengers pokemon. Because c'mon. Those are pretty harsh terms of defeat there. Those are just my suggestions of course though :U Anyone who has a better system, fairer numbers, or something like that I'd love to see, because this is a pretty important measure in this whole thing. We need something that'll be effective, but also hopefully not leave a bad taste in anyone's mouth.
That said, being a Leader isn't about winning all of your matches. You have to lose some or the league has no meaning. Even if you lose every match, that doesn't make you a bad Leader. You just might need to do some fine-tuning to your team, and we can help each other with that. I did such a trade with someone here yesterday. :)
I agree, leaders can have bad streaks too. But like I said above, someone who doesn't provide a challenge to anyone, novice or veteran, probbbably should build their skills up, perhaps by challenging the league, rather than maintain a spot as a leader on it.
Inactivity is the big one. If someone is gone for long periods of time and it's holding up challengers (such that there's a lineup at the door), it might be time to take the reins from that Leader. The league administration can decide whether the badges get awarded by default or whether someone steps in. Hopefully a Leader can appoint a replacement for such situations. It should be noted that, at some point, Polar or Zekrom (or both!) should bow out of leader positions and maintain a strictly league-running scenario, thus allowing them to step in should someone be absent for a period; they can take the Leader's team in that scenario and battle the challenger themselves with that team. That way there is little slowdown. (and no long lines). Upon return, the Leader makes arrangements to get the team back and resumes the role. Administration can also help out with Gyms that are idling by making their own typed teams for the challenger to battle, and I'm sure they can have some breeding help from the group of us!
Yes. Inactivity should be the most drastic offense, since it's the most potent killer of things like this. (I think anyways :v) We would need a system in place to expel inactive leaders/elites/champions, as well as have a way of dealing with their absences. Above - I mentioned something I was gonna go on with about that. We coooould, and this is just a suggestion, lemme know what you guys think, have a substitute system based on potential members of the league, rather than other members of the league. It may be a good way to test people in a position to gain seats as leaders or elites. I don't think we should hand out badges at any point, even if we have no substitutes from outside the league, another leader / elite should be able to step in and fill for the missing party. Annnnd let's not get onto anybody bowing out of leader positions just yet, nobody wants to be pushed out of something by their peers against their will. We can set up the rules regarding replacing leaders, and of course if anyone wants to step down, that's always up to them. That being said, keeping extra substitutes on hand would always be a good idea, so we can keep things running at maximum efficiency.
Pretty much agree with everything you said there Cyclone.
Just regarding the position of champion, the first person to beat the league takes the position yes? Then do they maintain the position as long as they see fit, or do they relinquish the spot whenever beaten?
Um, I believe once someone beats the league, everyone is under the impression it will be offered to that person. We can't MAKE someone join us, especially since we have rules about being present set up and everything - but we can hope someone good will always join. As for how long they keep it - I'd imagine until they're dethroned or give it up.
Yeah, I was kind of wondering that, too. The Elite Four stays intact, and the defeated Champion has to completely step down, but can later apply for a leadership role. Right?
EDIT: Actually, I'll expand on this! The defeated Champion, after a preset period passes, can challenge the existing Champion. This can only be done by people who have already defeated the league and been Champion at some point before; anyone who beats the E4 and fails to beat the Champion in their first run must run the gauntlet again, just like in the games. Unless we're easing that part.
Um, y'know that's actually not such a bad idea. That champions can challenge one another. Not sure if it should just be for the whole Champion title every time, without doing any gyms or elite battles again, but there's something there I think :U Someone else could probably come up with something better than me for this. Anywho; I'll re-PM ultraviolence. It stands as such now.
Current Listing:
1st: Antebellum / Steel
2nd: Euphoric / Dragon
3rd: Polar Spectrum - / Flying
4th: Zekrom / Fire
5th: Charizard Man - / Ground
6th: TGM - / Water
7th: Fokko / Grass
8th: Cyclone / Dark
9th: enigma / Fairy
10th: BlueBoi / Ice
11th: AdamEternal / Electric
12th: Falkbalk / Rock
13th: Ultraviolence / Bug
14th: Ferraligator /Ghost & Dark
15th: Ozymandias / Psychic & Electric
Remaining Types
Normal
Fire
Fighting
Water
Flying
Grass
Poison
Ground
Psychic
Rock
Ice
Bug
Dragon
Ghost
Steel
Fairy
Alright, so we're back to Ultraviolence again. Not bad.