• Our friends from the Johto Times are hosting a favorite Pokémon poll - and we'd love for you to participate! Click here for information on how to vote for your favorites!
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.
    Register

Rate The Signature Of the Person Above You

  • Thread starter Deleted member 143209
  • Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
^'s post was deleted.
^^'s signature has been disabled at the time of this post.

^^^ I guess it looks organized, but the spoiler, images and bold text bug me... So yeah, not much of a fan. 7/10
 
Tag is okay I guess, not my cup of tea.
6/10
 
Everything looks great, I'd steal it if I could. XD
10//10
 
*stares at sig too long* uh, what was I supposed to do again? oh, right! rate the sig!
XD
10/10

EDIT: I mean it, I'm a freakin' ninja target practice: 10/10
I'm nice even though you ninja'd me! XD
 
Hehehe, your so awesome CG. Lol, just for that, 9/10
They are only banners, but they are epic Code Green ones :]
 
Thanks! 10/10
That means alot. I need the random "good job" to function. XD
*Alert. received too little positive feedback. all systems shutting down.* XD
 
The font is win. Positioning and blending though is a bit off Imo.

6/10.
 
That thing reminds me of Totoro. xD It's awesome.
10//10
 
Nice even format you have going on. It might look nice centering it too.
8/10.
 
I'd be evil if I didn't give you a 9/10
XD
 
I hate this Laady Gaga fad tbh. It's too common.
The CSS is okay I mean it's not too hard to do what is done.
The link colours are ugly as is the tag. It's just not a great sig seems sorta random and pointless in parts tbh.
6/10
 
Mmm, I like the Squares. The black ones kinda get lost into the dark background but it's defiantly nice.

8/10

[@Jordan. Lol. 50 Pixel fail.]
 
Ok....lolz, it a little wierd, no offence...

5/10

PLEASE, if you have any advice on better text, tell me!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top