• Our friends from the Johto Times are hosting a favorite Pokémon poll - and we'd love for you to participate! Click here for information on how to vote for your favorites!
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

South Korea Impeaches President

  • 1,136
    Posts
    8
    Years
    Washington Post
    BBC

    The South Korean president has been impeached (investigated) for signs of corruption and fraud as well as various other shady dealings. She's not very popular as of late. What are your thoughts on this matter? Will it affect foreign relations? Discuss.

    The turmoil that has engulfed South Korea for weeks has now crossed a critical threshold. The National Assembly voted on Friday to impeach President Park Geun-hye. She?s accused of more than a dozen constitutional and legal offenses, including helping her shadowy confidante extort money from corporations, peddle influence and meddle in state affairs. She joins a long line of Korean presidents who have been embroiled in scandals.

    But the significance of the impeachment vote goes far beyond this particular scandal. This scandal brought to light particularly egregious examples of the coziness of government-business ties, elite privilege, the untrammeled powers of the presidency, and deep societal inequities. These factors together helped drive Park?s approval ratings down to 4 percent and help explain the increasingly large candlelight demonstrations calling for Park Geun-hye to resign.

    The millions of people protesting Park?s refusal to resign prompted the opposition parties to impeach her. Together, the opposition parties hold a majority of seats in the National Assembly, but fewer than the two thirds required to pass the impeachment motion. The 234 votes for impeachment on Friday indicate that about half of the legislators from Park?s own conservative party, including some of her own faction, joined the opposition parties in voting for impeachment.

    The impeachment motion is just the beginning. As the process grinds forward, candlelight demonstrations are likely to continue. The day after the impeachment vote, one demonstration drew nearly a million people. But tackling the endemic corruption and social inequities that this scandal represents will take much longer.

    What comes next

    The motion?s passage suspended Park?s powers, but not her title or salary. Prime Minister Hwang Kyo-Ahn took over as acting president. Hwang is also deeply unpopular, as a Park appointee and loyalist. He is unlikely to change policy.

    The Korean Constitutional Court now has six months to weigh the evidence for Park?s impeachment. This may not be a quick or simple process. The court may wait for the independent counsel to finish investigating accusations leveled at Park in the impeachment motion. In addition, the court is reputedly conservative-leaning and at least six of the nine justices (and the terms of two are scheduled to end early next year) must vote to uphold the impeachment motion. If they clear this bar, then a presidential election will take place within 60 days.
     
    I don't know too much about South Korea, but I don't think this will have much of an effect on foreign relations. It very much seems to be an internal issue and South Korea doesn't have enough global influence for their internal complications to have much of an effect on international politics.

    The only foreign country likely to see any effects of this is North Korea and they're too busy posturing and making grandiose threats for it to make a big impact there either. North Korea won't really care unless the South decide to bend down and beg for their forgiveness and that won't happen.

    So it might mean big internal changes but I doubt there'll be much of an impact outside of South Korea.
     
    If anything it'll improve foreign relations, it'll give her and Trump something in common come March.
     
    Who replaces her if she is removed or steps down will be the most telling thing. Seems to be a lot of anti-establishment sentiment around the world lately. Perhaps someone who styles themselves as an outsider will replace her, but all that aside I don't think there will be huge upsets in international relationships.
     
    Who replaces her if she is removed or steps down will be the most telling thing. Seems to be a lot of anti-establishment sentiment around the world lately. Perhaps someone who styles themselves as an outsider will replace her, but all that aside I don't think there will be huge upsets in international relationships.

    Right-wing (if not economically, culturally and socially) populism is taking over Europe and the US. So ya, lots of anti-establishment stuff going on. But as far as I know, it isn't impacting Asia, but i could totally be wrong on that.

    What did the South Korean president do?
     
    What did the South Korean president do?

    tl;dr she let a highly suspicious friend/associate with no government position of any kind have immeasurable influence over her administration, to the point of it being debatable who the real person in power was.

    the full extent is still being investigated but the main idea is that geun-hye was corrupt to the core and the general public went ballistic once the influence of soon-sil was revealed. what's even weirder is park geun-hye went into politics because she 'wanted to understand the position of her father', who was a dictator for nearly two decades, and turned out to be entirely corrupt as well - albeit a different kind of corruption.
     
    Last edited:
    tl;dr she let a highly suspicious friend/associate with no government position of any kind have immeasurable influence over her administration, to the point of it being debatable who the real person in power was.

    the full extent is still being investigated but the main idea is that geun-hye was corrupt to the core and the general public went ballistic once the influence of soon-sil was revealed. what's even weirder is park geun-hye went into politics because she 'wanted to understand the position of her father', who was a dictator for nearly two decades, and turned out to be entirely corrupt as well - albeit a different kind of corruption.

    Then @Esper is right about the anti-establishment stuff. To determine if its populism, what types of policies did she institute?
     
    to be honest, i'm not sure about her policies because i've only really been following the scandal since a few days days before the impeachment proceedings. i haven't read up on her administration as a whole.

    I would do some research on the interwebs, but I have exams lol. If anything, my guess is that she was more left-wing (for them) because they fought communism (technically still at war too). They had more capitalistic reforms, so idk what their economic freedom index is now. Ill look it up later.
     
    Back
    Top