Ivysaur
Grass dinosaur extraordinaire
- 21,042
- Posts
- 18
- Years
- Age 34
- He/him
- Madrid, Europe
- Seen Nov 30, 2024
231805
I'm seeing more arguments in favour than against right now...although I still think the EU bleeds us dry and doesn't give us anywhere near enough in return
In fact, the EU returns to the UK half of the funds it contributes. Starting with the 1% of the country's GDP it pays in (£18bn), the EU returns £5bn without touching it and then some £4bn is paid back as part of investment and agricultural funding. So the actual net cost is about 0.5% of the country's GDP, which isn't exactly the definition of "bleeding us dry".
Meanwhile, studies cited by Oxford investigators show that an increase of 1% in the amount of immigrants cause swings worth 0.3% of the average salary- so any inflation rise is going to be far more relevant. Not only that, but in the 1997-2005 years, the increase of immigration had a positive correlation with wages, meaning that more immigrants meant higher wages. In other words, the connection is not always negative. Furthermore, the study also found that the ones whose salaries are more likely to be hurt by immigrants are... other immigrants, not native British.
In other words, the "immigrants push our wages down" is more of a myth than an actual relevant factor.