• Ever thought it'd be cool to have your art, writing, or challenge runs featured on PokéCommunity? Click here for info - we'd love to spotlight your work!
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

USUM last pokémon game for 3DS?

Will USUM be the last pokemon game for the 3ds?
Prolly nope. It wouldn't surprise me if the Switch Versions became the focus though.
Kind of the relation that Consoles and PC ever had, Switch's Version will prolly be the superior/most pretty one and the 3DS one will keep walking on the same route it has been walking on, with its small resolution, ugly graphical quality, frame drops, etc.
Unless Nintendo decided to make a replacement for it, that is.
 
I don't see where people are getting the idea that they announced the Switch game recently because of supposed backlash from USUM silence. That's insinuating that Game Freak mindlessly catered to needless complaining, and that's not how they work. When are people gonna learn to be patient? Seriously, the majority of the responses from butthurt fans is getting asinine.

Well it does seem odd that they would announce a game for the switch before the games before it were even released, not to mention that the timing is pretty suspicious.
 
I dont see why they would be.

The Switch simply is not popular enough (~5m sales compared to the ~19m of the 3ds over the same time period) to make a main series game for, it wouldnt sell well.

This coupled with the higher development cost with a more complex system, it would be too much of a risk to make it switch exclusive.
 
I dont see why they would be.

The Switch simply is not popular enough (~5m sales compared to the ~19m of the 3ds over the same time period) to make a main series game for, it wouldnt sell well.

This coupled with the higher development cost with a more complex system, it would be too much of a risk to make it switch exclusive.

The switch actually is doing really well, the main reason sales are so low is because of supply issues. And don't forget, the switch games are a few years away, by that time it will have sold much more.
 
I don't think the Switch game(s) are too far along in development since the Switch is a new system and so far we only have a confirmation that it's happening and was likely announced way ahead of time because of the backlash from the announcement that US/UM would be on the 3DS (despite all of the complaints about the opposite happening...), so I could see them making one last set of games for the 3DS if only to keep the money coming in while they work on whatever they're doing for the Switch.

It just depends on what Game Freak decides to do and if Nintendo is willing to let them do it.

"Switch is a new system" but.... they don't wait for the system to come out first...... we have games released alongside the system, meaning it was available to the developers early.... so this could have been going for years at max as long as they had the system

They announced it early because of USUM being on 3DS backlash..? I don't think I understand

I dont see why they would be.

The Switch simply is not popular enough (~5m sales compared to the ~19m of the 3ds over the same time period) to make a main series game for, it wouldnt sell well.

This coupled with the higher development cost with a more complex system, it would be too much of a risk to make it switch exclusive.

They have supply issues because they are competing with Apple (at least in the US) for a chip only manufactured by one company. Or so I was told.

In my area, a super large city, GameStop had to do preorders in July because they hadn't receieved any Switches in month and only expected to get a few. Toys R Us hadn't received any since launch. Best Buy and Target hadn't received any in weeks and then only a few. There are mutiples of each in my area and I called ones 1 hour away. Trust me I called them all lol.
 
"Switch is a new system" but.... they don't wait for the system to come out first...... we have games released alongside the system, meaning it was available to the developers early.... so this could have been going for years at max as long as they had the system

They announced it early because of USUM being on 3DS backlash..? I don't think I understand

some people are speculating the reason they announced pokemon on the switch so early is to appease fans who were salty over pokemon USUM not being on the switch
 
some people are speculating the reason they announced pokemon on the switch so early is to appease fans who were salty over pokemon USUM not being on the switch
They are wrong. It has nothing to do with appeasing fans. It is about moving on from the 3DS and letting people know. People who are salty need to understand that GF is not there to fill their wishlist. GF makes games to make money.
 
They are wrong. It has nothing to do with appeasing fans. It is about moving on from the 3DS and letting people know. People who are salty need to understand that GF is not there to fill their wishlist. GF makes games to make money.

Gamefreak won't make money if they don't do things fans like, because then only hardcore fans will buy the games. The massive difference in sales between each game shows that casual fans of the series might not buy games they're not interested in. And you have no way of knowing what Gamefreak is thinking. Neither do we. It's speculation.
 
The supply shortages were only a major issue at launch (like all new big name tech), and although they still exist to a smaller degree, that doesnt warrant 75% less sales. I might also add that the 3DS had a similar supply issue at launch.
And don't forget, the switch games are a few years away, by that time it will have sold much more.
The comparison was for sales over the same time period, being pre-orders plus two quarters of sales. Nintendo's sales estimates (prior to launch/supply problems) were 20m units sold by Q2 2018, compared to the 31m 3DS units sold over the same period.

The 5m switch units sold, compared to the 67m of the 3DS should force GF to not develop for the switch until it has a much larger user base. Sales would be severely limited, lowering revenue, coupled with the costs of developing for the new system, lowering profits. From a monetary standpoint, GF should not be making a switch exclusive game for at least another development cycle.

I have a Switch, and would love to have a main series game on it, but im just being realistic. I wouldnt mind some of the more obscure Pokemon titles i.e. Pokemon Ranger being released, as it wouldnt be as risky as making the main series Switch only.

EDIT: I might add that GF is a company, their only goal is to make money, not to innovate for the sake of innovation. Selling on the switch only would be a terrible buisness choice. It is only a vocal minority of fans who want games on the switch, as the switch user base is currently a minority in the Nintendo ecosystem.
 
I think that they're trying to phase out the 3ds and move to the switch. Nintendo said they'd support the 3ds, but for how long? Who knows. It could be 5 years. It could be 1 year. But either way, It's gonna end eventually.
 
I normally don't like saying things with 99% certainty, buttttttt

These are probably gonna be the last Pokémon games on 3DS. GF says they want the new Pokémon Switch out by next year at the earliest, so they most likely aren't even working on anything else except USUM and the upcoming Switch game. At best we might get a spin-off or something.
 
The only other thing that would likely come this generation would be Diamond and Pearl remakes, but a lot of people think it's too early for that. Additionally, there's already a Switch title well into development and it's unlikely they'd confirm a game that comes out after another still-unannounced title, before still another set has yet to be released. That's just too much - and besides, they have yet to release two sets of remakes on one console.

It's almost a sure bet that the next title will be on the Switch and that no more 3DS titles are coming.
 
Gamefreak won't make money if they don't do things fans like, because then only hardcore fans will buy the games. The massive difference in sales between each game shows that casual fans of the series might not buy games they're not interested in. And you have no way of knowing what Gamefreak is thinking. Neither do we. It's speculation.
Never said i know what GF is thinking. GF does not owe the fans anything. They are not gonna fill every single wishlist the fans has. It is not what we want. It is what GF wants.
 
Never said i know what GF is thinking. GF does not owe the fans anything. They are not gonna fill every single wishlist the fans has. It is not what we want. It is what GF wants.

Of course they're not gonna do everything, it wouldn't be their game otherwise, but they certainly pay attention the the community and what they want.
 
Of course they're not gonna do everything, it wouldn't be their game otherwise, but they certainly pay attention the the community and what they want.
GF should make their games the way they want. Not what fans want. Fans have no say in the matter.
 
Maybe they should, but that's not how it works. More fanservice = more money.
Fanservice is irrelevent. GF will make games regardless of the fans.
 
Fanservice is irrelevent. GF will make games regardless of the fans.

But they can't make games without money, which comes from the fans. Why do you think they pander kanto so much? Why do you think there are features like following pokemon and customization? Why do you think they market their products? Why do you think there are features like Poke Amie, or battle frontiers? Because they felt like it? No, it's so people will actually buy their products..............
 
But they can't make games without money, which comes from the fans. Why do you think they pander kanto so much? Why do you think there are features like following pokemon and customization? Why do you think they market their products? Why do you think there are features like Poke Amie, or battle frontiers? Because they felt like it? No, it's so people will actually buy their products..............

I don't think so. GF does what they want in the end. I don't buy fan service for a second.
 
I agree with Alexander,Fanservice is a bunch of baloney.Never think a company listens to their fans in the end it comes down to GF to decide.
 
Back
Top