Here's what you actually said:
The point is that you didn't necessarily think they're the Clockmaker. If you think they're third party because of the reason being 'because roles work differently than in EM' it means you know that third party roles work differently, otherwise why give that as the reason?
Do I need to teach you? Might is used as a probability, usually a low one. I said some kind of independent role because nothing much will change from towny or scum roles: they will be of the same alignment. Independent roles are something else. I don't know if they work differently or not. But my thoughts? They probably do since mine does as well. But Gunner brought up the Clockmaker specifically when she could have brought up any other role. I didn't think they were necessarily Clockmaker OR third party.
I used that phrasing because, you did neither refute my argument, nor did you deny it. You simply said it was right to do what you did, without offering an explanation, only stating opinions as facts, like here:
How is it not? Who's no u ing now? Look contributing means basically sharing his thoughts giving possibilities or scumhunt. All in all helping town. At least trying. How didn't I do this exactly? You aren't really explaining why, just making your opinions seem like facts.
And the whole no u ing thing is bad explained. The name makes it seem like I'm trying to paint you back as scum which I did not at the time. Where did you get the "no uing" from?
You called me "anti-town", how is that not an accusation?
Anti-town means someone who doesn't help town. It doesn't mean scum. Otherwise we would have abandoned the term and use scum forever. At least this is what I got from the word.
I can say that Gunner is anti-town because she doesn't want to share her thoughts. Also the fact that you liked her post just because she said No to me just proves my point.
Read the bolded parts.Need I say more? You're being redundant, elusive and are full of contradictions.
Lol what a joke. I love how you don't show the complete phrase. Are you doing this on purpose? You probably are.
Go read what I said. If you didn't get it maybe I wasn't making myself clear. I basically said the following:
Johnny is accusing me of no u ing him (read what I said earlier about what I thought no u ing was) but I never even accused him of being scum,
I was just defending myself. Johnny's reaction seems like a defensive reaction to me.
Or rather, you were VERY defensive.
Gunner's anti-town attitude is concerning indeed. But I think Johnny is worse. But again he always is.
I'm considering Gunner. Look Gunner lol, you better defend yourself and defend yourself good. Share your thoughts now.