Roy Mustang said:
Yeah, Brazil pwns. Everyone in our school is cheering for them. But I don't know about that. Austrailia is pretty good too. I like both, in my opinion. We'll see tomorrow then.
Then everyone in your school is a glory hound.
So far Brazil have been piss poor. I've said it before and I'll say it again, Brazil's defence is old and passed it, they look uncomfortable whenever opposition attackers run at them. And their attackers, who are supposedly so good that they make up for the shortcomings in defence, have looked completely average. Other than Kaka, the rest have been poor. Ronaldo in particular has looked lazy and, yes, he is overwieght.
Argentina are now a lot of people's pick to win, based off of one match. Yes, they beat Serbia & Montenegro 6-0, but one result does not make a tournament. Ask Czech Republic, winning 3-0 in style one game, then losing 2-0 the next.
France are a joke at the moment, the squad is too old. But, in World Cup 2010, I expect them to be a lot stronger. They have a lot of excellent young players to replace the old generation.
Now that Wayne Rooney is back and Peter Crouch is on the bench where he belongs, England will be a hell of a lot stronger. And with the manager finally willing to make big decisions, like bringing on Aaron Lennon, we may actually stand a good chance of winning. Germany and Holland have already said they don't want to play us and we've beaten Argentina in the last two games we've played against them, so I don't think there is any team that England will be afraid to play against.
Tongari said:
Maybe, but I don't think they could do any worse than they did in 2002, I was pretty disappointed back then, but I guess we go on, some of our Internationals get better, some get worse.
I live in England, and I think people are getting there highs up too much, flags in almost every window, every door etc. and people are actually betting they're 2nd most likely able to win.
First? Guess who. P:
That's because football is our national sport and the England invented the game. And the fans are passionate and loyal to their team, most other nations could do with learning from our fans.
England are ranked as second favourites to win the Cup, that says a lot. The experts are backing England to be a massive challenger.
Quick proof about how worthless the FIFA world rankings are:
USA are ranked the fifth best team in the world according to the FIFA rankings, yet they're the
twenty second favourites to win the World Cup. How does that work out? >.>
USA's team is pretty poor. People are claiming that the result against Itally was a good result. Yet, they couldn't keep their discipline when they had the one man advantage and ended up screwing themselves over. And they couldn't get a win against Italy, a team wrecked by the scandals from their domestic league. Italy are only a fraction of the team they would be without the problems behind the scenes. Now USA
have to beat Ghana and hope that Italy beat Czech Republic just to scrape through to the next round. And Ghana have a better team than the USA, so I expect USA to be leaving the tournament in the next 5-6 days.
Blue said:
I doubt it, France hasn't scored a single goal this cup and it still doesn't seem like they've gotten better after 2002. Players like Lee Chun-Soo and Park-Ji Sung I think are much better than Henry anyday.
Nah. As much as I hate the arrogant, French bastard, Thierry Henry is rated as the second best player in the world for good reason. He has won matches single handledly for Arsenal and he scares any defender he comes up against. It's just a shame he plays for a crap team and a crap country.