Actually, most of the world sees the US in a positive light (at least since a certain B. Obama is leading it) AND
most of the world is very supportive of the US's actions in Syria! Man, it's as if your entire image of your country is based on a misrepresentation of reality.
Wait, who is the "bad guy" Obama is supporting? I missed that. Funnily enough, when both of the candidates met the Egyptian dictator,
only one of them was exceedingly happy to make the acquaintance of a "bad guy"- and his name wasn't Hillary.
No, no. I think you got it wrong again- that was the Donald.
So would you say that the US is currently worse than it was 30 years ago?
Actually, you wouldn't- at least, the previous people who did similar things weren't.
Yes.
Exactly 9% of us. More or less the same amount of people who believe that the moon landings were faked. Probably the same ones as well.
So, in short: you really, really,
really,
really hate Hillary Clinton and you'd be ready to elect a monkey holding a crossbow if it were her political opponent just because of how much you hate her. At least I'm slightly comforted by the fact that you don't really think Trump is that good.
What I'm worried about is the fact that essentially every claim you have made in your post happens to be exactly 180? wrong. I'm not sure how good a judgement you can have when all your facts are upside-down. I guess that's the reason why people can vote for Trump- complete, utter misinformation that "feels right".
In terms of inherent lethality? Live Snakes.
Besides, she kept a private server at her private residence, so regardless of that fact, another politico article contradicts the other. It also doesn't change the fact that she lied about it at least once. Then stated 'my predecessors did it' which isn't true. They did not have private servers at their home or under their direct control. It's also one of those cases where it hasn't happened often, so saying that we could do the same thing and get away with it is a tad hopeful in my opinion.
Further more, attacking Syrian Troops doesn't get an 'Oops, thought they were ISIS' pass from me. Bombing an airbase without all the Intel is idiotic don't you think? So that is what I mean when I say the US is making mistakes. Not working with Russia is another mistake. Confusing ones allies with one's enemies is a bad misstep if you ask me.
There seems to be some disconnect with embezzlement and it's definitions. So, the article you positioned was filled on the basis of a licensing dispute, or more in line with failing to license. Also, if I ate an apple and someone said I didn't and showed someone a picture of my neighbor eating an apple does not negate the former. I don't know where the train stopped with that one, but I'll go with it.
Opinion polls aren't always the best source, but a decent enough basis. But, you know, opinions.
Better or worse off than 30 years ago? Well, on the basis of if my opinion matters? Yes, worse off, but you should also note that what I said does not correlate with 'Clinton breathes oxygen, therefore the US is worse than ever'. Economically, the country is okay but it isn't like it used to be. The dollar value has seen itself plummet, manufacturing positions have moved overseas partly because of terribly laid tax plans (thanks Reagan, great job).
So off the top of my head, has Clinton made the country better, or worse? No, on both. She hasn't made anything better and she couldn't stop Nike moving away if she tried. I'm not gullible enough to lay the blame of 30 years of economic turmoil at the foot of one person. So handing me loaded questions is kind of low. I just note that what she has done (or not done) wouldn't have made much of a difference if she wasn't there. Does that make sense?
It isn't a matter of 'here's how bad Trump is' for me so much as 'What has Clinton done'? Does that make sense? Has she squandered her political position? Yes. Has she used her seat for personal gain? Yes. Has she failed the American people? I'll call letting Americans die as a yes.
You see, for me it's like I hold people who hold office to higher standards. I hold cops to higher standards than I do the average joe. Cops are supposed to know the law and rules of their precinct. Now if all they did was use their position to drink all the donuts and eat all the coffee you'd say that they failed in their duty as well, no?
I feel there is a disconnect with 'here's a character'. Hillary is already elected, albeit in a different seat. She has abused this power multiple times. Which seat has trump held? That's the point I'm trying to make. Hillary, abuse of power, known failure of held power. Trump, dork, has had no obligation to hold to a political seat before.
Making snide remarks about how wrong I am and all 'misconceptiony' or what else makes a total of 0 people that would probably legitimately value your opinion. 'Worrying' about me is downright insulting, when issued with loaded connotations. So, cheers I guess.