Agree or Disagree

Status
Not open for further replies.
Agreed. That's why most students who don't know what to do end up doing nothing :)

Humans are not smarter than animals.

Megan said:
I think I'd actually disagree. Infinity is more of a catch-all term that we use when we want to say "we don't know". The universe may have well started as just one small point. And when it finally expanded it didn't really have infinite proportions. But even now we're still talking about space getting bigger and bigger as all the smaller parts (solar systems, but also light particles, etc.) continue to drift apart.
We just don't know what's beyond that point. I suppose it does go back to the catch-all term of infinity. In that respect you could probably argue that it is infinite. ^^"
Click to expand...
I'd agree with you, most people use "infinite" to describe a "big number".
But as a mathematician, infinity means something to me ^^
 
That's entirely up to how you interpret smartness imo
To make things easy on myself I think I'll just go with that, since humans are animals as well, we can't be smarter =3
So Agreed =p

Violence/force should only be used in self defense.
 
yeah agree. Even if I would say there's still a difference between force and violence, even in self-defense. Like you can defend yourself to the point where that's enough or maybe become overly aggressive and violent when there's not the need.

Prisons shouldn't just be a punishment but should also provide for social reintegration.
 
I can agree. Although I admit I wouldn't be comfortable trying to reintegrate everybody back into society. There are some really heinous crimes and the justice system would have to accurately gauge who would reoffend. If wrong, innocent people face the consequences.

Pain is a necessary part of life.
 
Hmmmm...... probably an Agree. Though I'm kind of on the fence on this one.
Here there is decent support so that money doesn't have to be a problem for following an education. But money is hardly always the only limiting factor.
And even if it were, I feel like there will always be exceptions so... yeah... probably an Agree =p

Board games are better than card games.
 
Kinda disagree. I mean, Yu-Gi-Oh! and Magic are far better than Monopoly!
I don't know many board games (Monopoly, Cluedo, Connect Four I didn't know this one had so many names...) and I think Poker is more enjoybale.

Most people are interested in science.
 
On the fence on this one. I think nowadays younger people are a lot more into science because it's become a lot more accessible. But I really think that most people just want answers. And most of them don't really care where they come from. It's one of the reasons why conspiracy theories get so popular during a ime of crisis.

Science Fiction is more ineresting than Fantasy.
 
Can't agree or disagree. I actually haven't watched it, but to obtain such a following it must be doing something right.

Using defensive pokemon such as Umbreon in game can be boring.
 
Last edited:
I don't know? Never watched it. All I know about it is that it has Unown and Entei and that there were some Unown promo cards being distributed at the time...I think. Disagree due to the lack of Celebi, though!

The metric system is far superior to the imperial one!
 
The mathematician in me agrees, because (apparently) nothing we know is infinite (including the observable universe). As everything is finite, there are limits.
I saw a video, a long time ago, tht also explained that there was an upper bound to the size of animals, because bones basically need to be bigger to handle a higher weight, but the size of bones becomes limiting.
Also there is an obvious lower bound to the size of animals, or living beings: the size of molecules.

Tomatoes are vegetables.
Spoiler:
 
My bed's big enough and is not that big.
So, for me I guess that's a Disagree; as a bigger bed is unnecessary to me, takes up more space, and ofc costs more.

During hot temperatures drinking water tastes better.
 
Agree, due to craving it more.

A Pokemon game will never include the entire dex again. There will always be cuts.
 
Agree. Otherwise, there are too many 3D models to animate / update / give textures in every game.
Reminds me of the call to boycott Pokémon Sword/Shield because of the limited Pokédex...
Apparently Pokémon Sword/Shield are the third most-sold Pokémon games.
*Curb your enthusiasm theme*
Spoiler:


New Pokémons are more powerful than old Pokémons.
 
Disagree. Well, I think it's necessary to define old and new. I think new can start from gen 6 when many things changed. Well, indeed since the fairy type has been out, the dragon type lost its privilege that had for the entire series. Now the fairy type is the new dragon type (in fact many new legendaries are fairy types) and I also agree that new abilities, new pokemon somewhat are more useful than they were before, because the competitive game is now more played that it had been before. However, looking at statistics and excluding mega evolution (because that's a mechanic) the pokemon having major stats are mainly from gen I to V with some gen VII over there.

The POkemon series is going to have an end at some point.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top