blue
gucci
- 21,054
- Posts
- 17
- Years
- United Kingdom
- Seen Sep 26, 2021
I still think carracosta should have a little higher defence/sp. def in comparison to Archeops' stats.
GUYS YOU NEED TO VOTE FOR CARRACOSTA. KAORI AND I KNOW EVERYTHING SO AGREE WITH US.
I PREFER ARCHEOPS TO CARRACOSTA. Does that make me... shellfish?![]()
Seriously, though, it's the spiritual successor to Aerodactyl. Except that it has a better movepool. The ability is a major bummer, but for in-game sweepers rarely take a hit, anyway.
Wow are you serious, Gen V an amazing generation? Oo
That's fun you say that because I was just thinking that Archeops was one of the least bad gen V Pokémon x)
GUYS YOU NEED TO VOTE FOR CARRACOSTA. KAORI AND I KNOW EVERYTHING SO AGREE WITH US.
...either way, for Carracosta, having access to Shell Smash, good defences in general further boosted by its great ability, and the fact that it has good attack in general too AND the fact that with Swift Swim its speed is suddenly increased! Idk, I see more positives than negatives with this awesome turtle.
As for Archeops, yeah it has flaws battling-wise, but really, if you put a Choice Band on it - and with Wish support it could do pretty good imo. Competitively you COULD mark it work, but it would need a lot of support in order to be any good - actually, even a choice Scarf with maxed attack EVs would do pretty good, imo, since you'd outspeed the opponent, not letting them damage you. BUT Archeops has more weaknesses than Carracosta. :( A flaw is you'd also be Scizor-weak. Actually, Ice Shard weak, too, so kinda weak to priority. :x As well as that, you've also got the fact that it doesn't have many flying STABs that ARE strong. On the plus side it has Stone Edge, but imo, it's pretty much outclassed by Aerodactyl since Aerodactyl doesn't lose power mid-HP, and while it is lower than Archeops' overall base attack, it's actually higher when Archeops power drops without either having a Choice Band - plus faster speed. As a flying fossil type, Archeops is just no good.
Carracosta has much more to boast about! It has more variety in abilities that are actually useful whilst Archeops just has one that isn't, and actually quite sucks. It has great Attack and SpA but to have that be halved when below 50% HP? Sad.
Plus in a battle between the two, if you were to have Archeops use a super effective move against Carracosta with the Solid Rock ability, it would be reduced by 25%. Tell me that's not amazing! And even if you went with Sturdy instead, Archeops wouldn't be able to KO Carracosta the first turn and afterward you can use a STAB physical water type move or rock and you're in a winning situation!
VOTE CARRACOSTA FTW.
Nah it's been around 11 for a while, sadly. We've pretty much lost it (Carracosta fans). :(
Aaand with about three hours left, we can all be disappointed because it seems Carracosta has lost, but only just! :(
Unstickying and next poll will be made later on today. Feel free to continue discussion in this thread for as long as you want!!