Are you For or Against Gay Marriage?

Are you for or against gay marriage?

  • For gay marriage

    Votes: 97 51.6%

  • Against gay marriage

    Votes: 57 30.3%

  • Undecided

    Votes: 34 18.1%
  • Total voters
    188
Status
Not open for further replies.
I wouldn't mind paying, as long as its not astronomical. I don't care for it, but I don't believe that they should be stopped. What do I care, it doesn't effect me. I'd vote yes, but I don't mind waiting in back of the line for the polls.
 
I voted For Gay Marriages,
Love has nothing to do with gender.
 
I hate work for making miss out on so many posts.

Health care costs. You would be paying more.
Click to expand...
How? Why? What are you talking about?

I'm just asking a simple question: Do you think that all gays are going to be on government aid for health care? Every last single gay person born? Because to me, that is what your saying. Perhaps you are not coming across clear over the Internet, and you mean something entirely different.
 
well im still against it,nothing so far has changes my mind. But yes i do believe people are pretending to be for gay marrige but secretly vote against it. They feel agraid that since olmost nobody here is against it,they will be pushed around& stuff....something to think about,im sure nobody here is gonna judge people....
 
That is honestly the most pathetic idea I've ever heard.
"Oh, people MUST be PRETENDING to be for it. Surely nobody could REALLY want it to be allowed!"
 
I agree. But I dont know why wou bolded the word the. It would of been better if you bolded pathetic. But it was a pretty dumb idea.

The thing that comes down to it, is if we have pro-gay judges or con-gay judges.

It wouldn't matter if 95% of all people wanted gay marriage. If you had a con-gay judge, there would be no gay marriage.

I just read homosexuals in some middle-east countries get their reproduction organs mutilated. Which is horrible, but that could be a possible reason why gay people should act normal.

Because in some countries they look down upon it as the ultimate evil.
 
xXscytherXx said:
I agree. But I dont know why wou bolded the word the. It would of been better if you bolded pathetic. But it was a pretty dumb idea.

The thing that comes down to it, is if we have pro-gay judges or con-gay judges.

It wouldn't matter if 95% of all people wanted gay marriage. If you had a con-gay judge, there would be no gay marriage.

I just read homosexuals in some middle-east countries get their reproduction organs mutilated. Which is horrible, but that could be a possible reason why gay people should act normal.

Because in some countries they look down upon it as the ultimate evil.
Click to expand...

This place is not for debating but if this continues there's going to be a major flame war
 
Say it out loud with me, and you'll see I just enunciated it like the teenage girl I am XP~

So you're basically saying that because people in less civilized countries are prejudice, that we should be the same, hey? They also subjugate women there and give them no rights. We should use that as a guideline and have our women just be subservient to the male population too, huh?
 
Alright guys, I've been observing this thread for a while and I now see more discussion brewing out of this topic, it's becoming less of a poll right now. So I'll go ahead and move this thread to Other Chat, feel free to carry on any discussion there.

Also just a heads up, remember to take caution with your replies. We don't want anything leading to an out of hand argument.

~Moved
 
I'm against it.

It frustrates me to see people keep talking about "love" and if they are in "love" than they should get married.

Don't you know the entire reason why they hold rallies and parades about this crap? It's all about money, and it has nothing to do with love, although they like to sugar coat it. In case you didn't know, a homosexual couple with a civil union cannot claim life insurance or any type of marital benefit from their spouse. For example, when their spouse dies, all "spouse right" items will be first given either to parents (if living) or children (if had), and when neither exist, they are given to the closest family member (sibling, cousin, etc.).

I'm sure that's why I'm against it, not because of the natural reasons why not, but because for some reason these "fights" for "gay love" are nothing about love at all.

Actually, a really good example of things that would probably happen if gay marriage was allowed is that new movie coming out with Adam Sandler and the guy from King of Queens. They marry each other to get benefits. Frankly, I'm sure straight people do it too, but why worsen the situation.

Everything that xXscytherXx has said I agree with. I'm not going to restate what he's already said.


Adding this: A lot of people fake gay. Not saying they all do, but right now society thinks it's "cool" and suddenly there's all the more gay people out.
 
No, you're wrong. It's not about money, it's about equal rights by governmental law. For example, the right for a spouse to not have to testify in court is one that ,at the moment, homosexuals are denied.
 
Tina said:
I'm against it.

It frustrates me to see people keep talking about "love" and if they are in "love" than they should get married.

Don't you know the entire reason why they hold rallies and parades about this crap? It's all about money, and it has nothing to do with love, although they like to sugar coat it. In case you didn't know, a homosexual couple with a civil union cannot claim life insurance or any type of marital benefit from their spouse. For example, when their spouse dies, all "spouse right" items will be first given either to parents (if living) or children (if had), and when neither exist, they are given to the closest family member (sibling, cousin, etc.).

I'm sure that's why I'm against it, not because of the natural reasons why not, but because for some reason these "fights" for "gay love" are nothing about love at all.

Actually, a really good example of things that would probably happen if gay marriage was allowed is that new movie coming out with Adam Sandler and the guy from King of Queens. They marry each other to get benefits. Frankly, I'm sure straight people do it too, but why worsen the situation.

Everything that xXscytherXx has said I agree with. I'm not going to restate what he's already said.


Adding this: A lot of people fake gay. Not saying they all do, but right now society thinks it's "cool" and suddenly there's all the more gay people out.
Click to expand...

So you're saying ALL gay people do that? There is no such thing as a couple in love, eh? I would have to disagree. That's not fair to those that are in love. You just called all gays single-minded money grubbers.If what you say is true, then straight people shouldn't get married either.

And why can't they get married with full benifits like anyone else? You just stated that they have less rights than everyone else.

xXscytherXx didn't give a valid reason other than health cost. He also called gays freaks by saying they should act "normal".
 
Tina said:
I'm against it.

It frustrates me to see people keep talking about "love" and if they are in "love" than they should get married.

Don't you know the entire reason why they hold rallies and parades about this crap? It's all about money, and it has nothing to do with love, although they like to sugar coat it. In case you didn't know, a homosexual couple with a civil union cannot claim life insurance or any type of marital benefit from their spouse. For example, when their spouse dies, all "spouse right" items will be first given either to parents (if living) or children (if had), and when neither exist, they are given to the closest family member (sibling, cousin, etc.).

I'm sure that's why I'm against it, not because of the natural reasons why not, but because for some reason these "fights" for "gay love" are nothing about love at all.

Actually, a really good example of things that would probably happen if gay marriage was allowed is that new movie coming out with Adam Sandler and the guy from King of Queens. They marry each other to get benefits. Frankly, I'm sure straight people do it too, but why worsen the situation.

Everything that xXscytherXx has said I agree with. I'm not going to restate what he's already said.


Adding this: A lot of people fake gay. Not saying they all do, but right now society thinks it's "cool" and suddenly there's all the more gay people out.
Click to expand...


I agree with you too. Everything you said, I'm 100% with it.
 
But how? You're saying that all gays care about money. Straight people should not get married either, because they married for benifits as well. All your saying is gays have less rights, and deserves it. Please explain that. If they don't have spousal rights, then thats shows they have less rights. And you guys advocate that.

I don't care about the gay thing, or even whether they love or not. Its about the rights. If they don't have rights, then NO AMERICAN DESERVE THAT RIGHT. Just like other minorities have rights.

All you guys are proving is that you are homophobes-gay haters. I am not calling you this, not at all. But your reasons are sorta saying that. So far, I've seen some say (all combined from different people) they are greedy, money-grubbing freaks. Thats not right. Not one bit. There is no real reason that has been proven other than the bible, and I try to stay away from religion.
 
Tina said:
I'm against it.

It frustrates me to see people keep talking about "love" and if they are in "love" than they should get married.

Don't you know the entire reason why they hold rallies and parades about this crap? It's all about money, and it has nothing to do with love, although they like to sugar coat it. In case you didn't know, a homosexual couple with a civil union cannot claim life insurance or any type of marital benefit from their spouse. For example, when their spouse dies, all "spouse right" items will be first given either to parents (if living) or children (if had), and when neither exist, they are given to the closest family member (sibling, cousin, etc.).

I'm sure that's why I'm against it, not because of the natural reasons why not, but because for some reason these "fights" for "gay love" are nothing about love at all.

Actually, a really good example of things that would probably happen if gay marriage was allowed is that new movie coming out with Adam Sandler and the guy from King of Queens. They marry each other to get benefits. Frankly, I'm sure straight people do it too, but why worsen the situation.

Everything that xXscytherXx has said I agree with. I'm not going to restate what he's already said.


Adding this: A lot of people fake gay. Not saying they all do, but right now society thinks it's "cool" and suddenly there's all the more gay people out.
Click to expand...

It's a MOVIE.
Does that make it true?

"People" like you and xXscytherXx make reasons agaisnt it because how the media protrays them as. As Allstories said.
Media is NOT always right about Gays and what they do.

Your just making it sound as people become gay just so they can get money.

"Love" is the word your saying is nonexistant.
What you said was nobody but straights could "love" another person.
How is that possible if "love" is nonexistant?

Edit:
That a better word?
 
Last edited:
Achamo said:
It's a MOVIE.
Does that make it true?

Homophobes like you and xXscytherXx make reasons agaisnt it because how the media protrays them as. As Allstories said.
Media is NOT always right about Gays and what they do.

Your just making it sound as people become gay just so they can get money.

"Love" is the word your saying is nonexistant.
What you said was nobody but straights could love another person.
Is that true?
Click to expand...

Please be careful what you say. I don't want this to become a flame war. It starts with name-calling.

But I agree 100% with what you said. Their points are showing that they might be homophobes, but you shouldn't outright say it. Although they are showing it. I agree with what you said about them & the media, but we gotta try to avoid flaming.
 
Tina said:
Actually, a really good example of things that would probably happen if gay marriage was allowed is that new movie coming out with Adam Sandler and the guy from King of Queens. They marry each other to get benefits. Frankly, I'm sure straight people do it too, but why worsen the situation.

Adding this: A lot of people fake gay. Not saying they all do, but right now society thinks it's "cool" and suddenly there's all the more gay people out.
Click to expand...

Oh my god. Who are you to say that AN ENTIRE POPULATION of people would do something like that for MONEY? How dare you make such an accusation. How dare you. Homosexuality is NOT A FAD. IT IS NOT SOMETHING THAT PEOPLE ARE JUST 'DOING TO BE COOL'. IT HAS EXISTED SINCE BEFORE THE DAWN OF CIVILIZATION. It's been observed in ANIMALS for god's sake. And you're telling me that you would be so callous as to deny people the freedom they deserve BECAUSE SOMEONE SOMEWHERE MIGHT ABUSE THAT FREEDOM? WELL, GOLLY GEE, WE BETTER BAN INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE. THAT COULD LEAD TO SPOUSAL ABUSE, YOU KNOW. THEM NEGROES SURE CAN BE AGGRESSIVE, AMIRITE? AAAARGH YOU ARE NOT BEING RIGHTEOUS. YOU ARE NOT CONCERNED WITH THE GOOD OF THE COUNTRY. YOU ARE JUST. AFRAID. OF GAY PEOPLE.
 
Please calm down. And watch your language. I know you were proving a point. I know you was being sarcastic. And I know you don't mean it. But I come to this site hoping that I could avoid any sort of language that even points to racism. I'm not saying anything bad about you, and I agree. But don't say negroes on this site again. It's never right. I have enough of that outside my building.

I do agree with everything else you said.
 
Allstories said:
Oh my god. Who are you to say that AN ENTIRE POPULATION of people would do something like that for MONEY? How dare you make such an accusation. How dare you. Homosexuality is NOT A FAD. IT IS NOT SOMETHING THAT PEOPLE ARE JUST 'DOING TO BE COOL'. IT HAS EXISTED SINCE BEFORE THE DAWN OF CIVILIZATION. It's been observed in ANIMALS for god's sake. And you're telling me that you would be so callous as to deny people the freedom they deserve BECAUSE SOMEONE SOMEWHERE MIGHT ABUSE THAT FREEDOM? WELL, GOLLY GEE, WE BETTER BAN INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE. THAT COULD LEAD TO SPOUSAL ABUSE, YOU KNOW. THEM NEGROES SURE CAN BE AGGRESSIVE, AMIRITE? AAAARGH YOU ARE NOT BEING RIGHTEOUS. YOU ARE NOT CONCERNED WITH THE GOOD OF THE COUNTRY. YOU ARE JUST. AFRAID. OF GAY PEOPLE.
Click to expand...

I second this.
We've had Gays and Bisexuals living on earth for some time now, have they done anything bad that had to do with they're sexuality?

Not anything I've heard of.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top