Do reads all you want, but don't kill innocents off of a baseless point like that. Specially when there's a confirmed non town on the loose.
At least I'm not quoting things and scumreading people off of words and sentences they didn't say.
Again, it makes a whole hell of a lot more sense to lynch a potentially wrong scumread -
which I backed up my thoughts, regardless of how hard you try to make it seem that it was baseless - than a helpful, talkative survivor, whose lynching
literally effects no side. It's nearly a no-lynch but in this case you lose a potential ally. That fact you're still trying to make your reasoning make sense is a bit ridiculous.
I also don't get what's your problem with "my game".
Based on that I'd say my game is much better than yours. You're not even paying attention, when has Desinishon ever been not parrot-y.
If you read my post properly, you would've understood that the "game" comment was directed at the Vigilante.
I suppose I'm not the only one "not paying attention," then.
But I will further elaborate on my ideas concerning Desi. The post in particular I was referring to was:
I can't read lisia at all. You can see that in touhou xD. So, I'm not going to vote for inactive person. So here....
The "parrot-y" part in question was the fact his reason to lynch Golgari instead of Lisia was a direct copy of the words people put into the mouths of Lisia voters, the whole "oh you guys are just voting her for being inactive" argument. There's no substance that went along with his decision to lynch Golgari in her stead either, nor any given reason why he thought voting off a third party was a better idea.
We shouldn't brush it off as "usual behavior."
-----
i think it's safe to assume the GS is dead/recruited, the cop may also be dead, the party host is dead/recruited, and the crier is dead/recruited.
+1 to idea that GS, Party Host, and Crier are all dead. Again, to anybody who holds those roles,
let us know you're alive by using your powers. Otherwise this could be valuable information on making sure that mafia or cult members can't claim these roles.
Actually, alternatively, these roles could've been converted. In any case, it might be a good idea to treat these roles as dead, and anybody who claims them without proof as scum or cult.
-----
Thus my FOS are on the people that voted for Golgari after he roleclaimed since the mafia would definitely want to get the survivor lynched. That would be (excluding Johnny) Charlie Brown, Desinishon and Catman.
I think to scumread any of the Golgari voters you'd have to nitpick their reasons, because any sensible mafia team would've spread their votes. It actually makes a little less sense to go after Golgari from a mafia perspective unless you were doing this strategy. I don't know how much I trust Charlie Brown though (just a gut thing atm, I would have to look into his posts again to really make or break that decision.)
-----
You can't believe every damn claim in mafia games, or don't you guys remember Bard claiming Aiber in death note? lol
Well, this:
It's also worth keeping in mind that no-one is confirmed while the Cultist is still alive.
... and the fact that by your logic Johnny, no one should put 100% stock into your claim either. There is a chance that the real Ghoul is lurking/unwilling to cc/dead/inactive and you're just getting away with claiming the role.
Not that I believe that, since I would hope they would've come out to cc the role and help us lynch a mafia/cult member, but the point still stands. You can't really get away with saying "oh, because it's so easy to claim such-and-such," without invalidating yourself, because there are a multitude of ways someone can claim a role, like yours, and get away with it.
-----
Ah, the good old days. Hard to believe that was almost a year ago.
Remember that time when you promised that you'd make me the queen of your new world and left me to burn instead of a truck.
I do.
-----
That's not a problem, because killing recruits is pointless. Many of the dead third parties might've been recruits, they're nowhere near of winning, whilst the mafia has the upper hand right now.
Killing recruits is not pointless lol that is such a scummy thing to say. It sets the cult back a day. It's ineffective compared to killing the lead but it is in no way pointless.
I wouldn't call it scummy
per se, Sam. I kind of agree with Johnny here - killing a recruit kind of feels like trying to scoop out water from a sink instead of just using the drain, while neglecting the murderer behind you. It's best to draw out the leader somehow instead of spending the day's lynch on someone who will die anyway if we play our cards right.
-----
It's not like I stalk you. By the way, you're out of milk.
Oh, and we fed your goldfish for you! C: