^^NICK^^ v.2.0
Mister Revolution Man
- 779
- Posts
- 21
- Years
- Age 34
- NYC, in a bakery, eating croissants with Dakota, m
- Seen Apr 14, 2009
Yeah. If you believe in the Bible, and the flood, then it would make sense. Plesiosaur, (Or any of its relatives) lived in the water, and they were carnivores. So, during the flood, it could have swam and stayed in all of the water, and survived on all of the, er... bodies of the rest of the animals and humans. o_o;^^NICK^^ v.2.0 said:I kind of believe in Loch Ness, because, like Kay said, it could be something that stayed alive form the dinosaur age.
I've seen a picture of a baby Plesiosaur that a man found dead on a beach. He still has the body of it, stuffed and everything. So, that proves that they could still survive. I don't think that any of the larger Dinosaurs, like Tyranosaurus Rex, still exists, but some of the ones that lived out in the ocean could. I've also heard of some people that found a very, very old fish that was supposed to be extinct out in the ocean. (I fogot its name.)Arcanine said:I always knew Big Foot was not real. But Loch Ness I think it is real. I mean back in 1979 some people fishing saw this thing in the water dead and when they got a big boat to get it out they found it was like the Loch Ness Monster (what people said it looked like) and a few weeks after that there was another man fishing and he got a baby one (he let it go). But Big Foot is a hoax but the Loch Ness Monster is real.
I'm pretty sure that you're right; and yeah, I've noticed how much it resembles Relicanth!DragonTrainer said:Ah, Kayleigh, I know what fish you are talking about, I believe it was a coelacanth or something along those lines, it kind of reminds me of the pokemon relicanth, seeing as if you compare the two, they do look quite similar indeed. It was thought to have been extinct millions of years ago, but recently a colony was found, so that proves what they thought :P
Yes, I think it is possible for a lot of animals long thought extinct to be alive, mainly oceanic animals. Think about it, its predicted that there are about 5 million plants and animals yet to be discovered. We haven't even truly began to explore the depths of the ocean, it covers up 70% of the Earth, yet we can hardly scrape the surface of the ocean. I mean, we can hardly go down in the ocean, our subs aren't that powerful, and I doubt they could take such pressure, but I'm sure that some animals have the body structure to resist oceanic pressures, and those animals may very well be ancient animals.
~DragonTrainer:dragonite
Ohh, okay. And well, I have seen some pictures that were proven to be fake, but... Some scientists that were out on the lake took some really interesting pictures of what they believe to be the Loch Ness Monster. The water was blurry, and so the pictures weren't exactly very clear, but, it was easy to make out a head and a fin/flipper. I wish I could find them for you and post them.ANTI-SPAM GUN said:nope sorry mest up on all my typing.
Lockness nah it's all some lie somone made up to get popular.
Yeah, well, I ramble a lot, too. >_>DragonTrainer said:Yes, from all of the accounts that I have read and heard of, the Loch Ness monster seems to be a plesiosaur, or a very distant cousin of it, but with enough resemblance to the plesiosaur that you can compare the two and realize that they are related. Lol, I like rambling on ^^''. There are many doctored pictures of Nessy, or the Loch Ness Monster, whichever you prefer, even though they looked convincing.
This reminds me of back when they thought that giant squids were nothing but a mere myth, yet somehow one washed up perfectly preserved on the beach, once again proving the scientists wrong. But, we can't really blame them for being wrong, they work from scratch most of the time, so, they have to be very creative.
Anywho, enough of my rambling :P
~DragonTrainer:dragonite
True. Well, have they ever seen a live one out in the wild? It seems to me like they have, but I'm not really sure.DragonTrainer said:Man, I'm not quite sure, but I think it may be in the late 1800's, or sometime in the 1900's, I just barely remembered the whole thing. But, beware: Our technology, while not so far advanced, is well enough at a stage where making fake pictures isn't much of a challenge. But, I mean, the squid was perfectly preserved, except for a few minor details, but its the best they have come up with. I think they may still have it at a museum or something, but I do recall seeing something on the discovery channel on that.
~DragonTrainer:dragonite
Really? Do you know what kind it was? (Ehh... I'm having flashbacks of JAWS now. =_= I really don't feel like swimming in the ocean, now.)ANTI-SPAM GUN said:And The worlds largest shark too.
New Zealand!DragonTrainer said:No, as far as my knowing, they haven't sighted a real giant squid yet, though some parts of deceased squids have been found, like the preserved body, some tentacles, etc. But, they do have some good ideas of where the squids may live, and how they mate and things like that. I think one of the places is off of the coasts of New Zealand, that's where they go to mate. They don't really have the funds to make a good submarine to go down deep in the ocean yet, and they don't have all of the necessary materials to make this submarine either.
~DragonTrainer:dragonite