- 162
- Posts
- 9
- Years
- Seen Jun 20, 2016
Wrong Non-heterosexual activity have always existed in various traits of various culture groups. However it was never an end all or division of such activities. The reality is due to the fear of "Soylent Greens" a program was placed to make sure the sexes were separated. The same program was used against non-Europeans as well. 1960's cross-dressing had nothing to do with non-heterosexuals at all. In fact hollywood/media around this time also started to use non-heterosexuals with anything the nation did not want to flourish. Like Electronic music for example was bashed using non-heterosexuals, and thus created a scene of non-heterosexuals who are into electronic music.What? Did you try to make a conspiracy theory out of homosexuality? Here are a few things I am going to throw in your direction.
1) The LGBT movement did start to begin in the 1960s, but it doesn't mean we were more accepted. LGBT+ identified people were seen as sexual deviants and as people with mental disorders. (And homosexual activity was still a crime back then too....)
It is not a minority at all. It is a person being manipulated into doing something they would never even think to do. Imagine the parents who used non-heterosexuals ideas to attack there children likes and dislikes only to generate the unwanted behavior. For example a man gives his sons action-figures to play with because he is playing with dolls. However this in fact might encourage this unwanted behavior the father was fighting against. In fact action figures never really existed at all, asides for models and statues. Now a little boy could sleep with his G.I. Joe and dream god knows what. An example like that is far fetched but it does occur.2) Why would people want to mimic being in an oppressed minority? And why would the media advertise that? There has got to be more than "population control" as a reason to convince people to be part of an oppressed minority.
The media is paid off to manipulate material in any form. Like when Terminator was filmed it was using an majority European cast because of the racism that would probably ensue at that time. However even people who are not European could enjoy terminator and it even have spawned plays. If it was a non-European cast would it have been received as well.
It is like how you go to an internet page and read news but it is really sponsered content. Or a videogame page and it is pushing for children to act a certain way, or think certain things. Take all of these magazines many women buy. Sponsored manipulative content. Point being is that money plays a big roll inside of it. It is little things from a fierce female to a submissive male among many things. Have you ever asked why do they show male violence as being funny and accepted but they rarely or barely show a woman, especially an ugly woman being violently attacked? Only such instances are in horror films. Why is that?
You got it wrong. This is something I had to learn. Stereotypes is a term used in media such a theater, to even videogames and news. It goes along with policing as well. Stereotypes are based on people and various people even mimic these stereotypes for whatever god forsaken reason they do. You can not escape stereotypes. Even I am playing out one, and more of them will be created. While they are used as weapons in media to depicted people,3) The prevalence of LGBT stereotypes happens mostly because of ignorance.
We use stereotypes to make characters realistic in media. You can not escape that at all unless you halt all production of media. They are right in front of you. Play a game like "Freedom Planet" and the stereotypes are all over the place. You can't help that unless you go above that.
People worship and follow celebrities like they follow religion and politics. When a certain person who is respected starts to do something others will follow. Many celebrities have jumped from feminism to non-heterosexual ( womanism ) activities. Many actors ( who are without a doubt there character ) in fact relive there rolls as times changes. Morphing into what was said about them or what should come from them. An actor who was a preacher came out as a molester. An sportsman was being called a woman had a sex change. An actress who was love starved and on the sauce had a meltdown. An actress who was a strong woman decided to be a Lesbian. Things like that. People will follow off a cliff.4) Not sure how idolizing of celebrities relate to this at all.
The people that hate the most will create children that rebel against them by becoming what they fear there children will become. They more you talk about something the more power it has over you. The more you bring up a topic the more you create a problem. It is better not to talk about something and that case is non-heterosexual activity.5) If the media was trying to convince people to "become homosexual," then why do we have the bury your gays trope? How would manipulating people to identify as LGBT+ work if the most prevalent association of being LGBT+ is unhappiness and premature violent/saddening death?
You know what many Jews do? They only watch 1920's and 1950's television. There is some television outside of that but otherwise they do not watch anything newer. In fact there entire religious structure is the community structure. The reason why you do not see an army of non-heterosexual Jews shaking things up is because they do not preach these ideas at all. They are clean of this problem AKA non-heterosexual activity. However for the gentile ( one soul AKA animal soul ) the problem is common because in most cases they do preach outside religion and keep up with trends.
I hate using that example but that is the source. People are preaching ( this whole entire conversation is preaching and teaching or installing ideas of non-heterosexual activity
6) And you are implying that LGBT+ identified people shouldn't be in media at all, but only all the straight, cis-gendered people should be portrayed in the media. That's not only unrealistic, but with your logic, you are also implying that the media would promote the "heterosexual agenda," which begs the question why the "homosexual agenda" is bad and why the "heterosexual agenda" is good? Because at this point you are rating sexualities and I find that problematic.
[/QUOTE] I am implying that any new media should not feature characters or stereotypes that is non-heterosexual. If a character is for some reason then it should not be the talk of the town. We do not need to hear "he is this" or "she is that". However as I love fiction I am not stopping people from whatever it is. I only ask that people shield there children from such instances or do even mention anything about it. If a school host any promotional material the parent should write or have them excused from that day. Even if candy/drugs ( sugar ) is involved.
I'm sorry, I'm not buying it. Can you give any examples of this actually occuring? The closest I can come to is the inclusion of stereotypically gay men in tv shows like The Simpsons and Will And Grace, but these were added to appeal to people who were already gay, not to try and convert hetrosexuals to being gay.
Will and Grace features at least one guy but at times the men are walked over. In fact this roll is played with "Adventure Time" and Peppermint Butler and Princess Bubblegum. In fact the hero in Adventure time is brushed off just because he is a dude while other more muscular characters are preferred. Even Banana man is pushed to side and when Princess Bubblegum is on a rampage nobody is stopping her. The Simpsons is actually from the tv series "The Carol Brunette show" ( you get the title ) which features many men being walked all over by women, along with Bart intelligence being over sighted by both his sisters. Even Marge is seen as the dominate parent in the relationship. Even with Flanders and his wife, and his messed up sons. The same with the Pastor and his wife and his wayward daughter. The same with the dumb police force who is seen breaking the law many times in the earlier Simpsons. In fact the entire Simpsons is innuendo all over the place. It is pretty girls being bashed for being pretty meanwhile all the males eventually gets attacked at some point for almost anything. Male discrimination.
it is a very original variation on the now age-old fear of the "homosexual agenda".
I do not fear that. I know it. I have been to college and the first thing I saw was a non-heterosexua male being as stereotypical as ever walking with hips and dressed in tighter clothing then his female counter part and this was back in 2006. I have laughed with people, cried, and almost had a reason to bed with people. Reality is that as non-heterosexual you are. You are feeding them or we have kept them alive for many years, without knowing it. It is like a WW2 vet buying Japanese videogames after holding so much negativity for Japan. Guess what? A whole bunch of people in the US and western shores own Japanese products by the thousands. I have over $5000 of merchandise probably that I imported.
So, the extremely conservative media of places like the US and Australia, who are known to be very much anti-LGBT+, are simultaneously pushing the conservative agenda and the mythical "gay agenda"? Nothing contradictory there at all.
Ha ha ha Australlia is part of the Common-wealth. Some British men think they have periods based off a census. Ha ha ha. Australlia is now taking on immigrants who do not want to be Amerikan, ha ha h a ha. Point being is that USA is not anti-LGBT because the amount of people purchasing material. I bet we are surrounded by that material at home as well. The more you hate the more you think about something. Best solution cut the fat of life and stop intaking anything related to non-heterosexuals.
Honestly, the word "unnatural" is ridiculous. Everything that exists is nature because it is bound by the laws of nature; it's literally impossible to have "un-nature".
Can two people of the gender make a baby without the need for miracle of medical science? You would need all kinds of extra equipment. Look two people a man and woman irregardless of age could make it in the wilderness more then two people of the same sex.
Give a man a job and watch how fast his seeds spread through the wind. Give anything else money and watch it buy junk.