as u can see everything reccomended for xp is lower than win 7 also if the version u plan on installing is win7 home premium or any other version thats not win7 ultimate many of the programs made for xp wont work on win7 unless u have win 7 ultimate and run the program in compatibility mode and anyways that disk cost almost 350$ why would u do it stick with win xp
As Yellow said, RAM is the only difference because, being 8 YEARS NEWER, 7 is running more in the background. For a very good reason, too. 7 can cope with an older CPU, I've had it running on my 1.2GHz/1.5GB/Tablet just fine. It's the RAM it needs and it still idles on less that Vista, which really isn't that bad. Did I mention how horrible XP x64 is? Because if you're gaming, chances are you're have 4GB ram, in which case:
1. You won't care less about the extra 500-600MB that Vista and 7 use
2. You'll have a 64-bit OS and XPx64 is a last minute-throw together. And no drivers for it, Whereas Vista and 7 x64 are great.
Also, regarding Program Compatibility, you should really do a bit of research before you go throwing it in as evidence. There are a small number of programs that don't run on XP; most of which are outdated. There's absolutely no reason to get Ultimate. Everything from Starter Edition (neutered Netbook version) has the option to run in compatibility mode. If you're thinking of XP mode, it's just another virtual machine, so you might as well run the more versatile VirtualBox from [Sun] *shotted* Oracle. By the way, XP mode is available in Window 7 Professional, which is only step up from Home Premium.
Oh, and if you're gaming on XP, have fun with your archaic DirectX 9, while we're all using DX11.
Sorry for ranting... :D
You've obviously never seen how effectively Avast scans then. =3 Believe me when I say if a file is getting transfered or running it's getting scanned in the background with Avast, downloads included. <3 Avast. (This is part of the free version, too.)
I'll have to have a look into Avast at some point; I used it ages ago when it was trying to imitate a CD Player, and that was enough to turn me off.
[beep], Seven, it won't even install on my PC because my PC is THAT bad. 1.15GHz, 256MB RAM. Not even enough to boot 10 Chrome tabs on Seven. I'll stick with my YouTube-less XP, thank you very much.
Yes, it will not physically let you install unless you have 512MB Ram. You can always hack the disc image to remove this, but it's really trying to tell you something.
That's also the funny thing about Chrome (and IE8/Safari). Each tab is a separate process. So while Firefox is a bit of a sloth to open up, and its uage may be higher with one tab open, it doesn't make a huge difference if you open a new tab. Whereas the others open an extra instance of the program with each tab.
If you find FF too slow, try K-Meleon. It's a little ugly (I'm a little obsessive, though), but it's quite snappy. Based on FF's engine, too.
15ares, you do, um, realise that the UAC prompts are to
stop unauthorised access to your system, don't you? XP is so prone to security threats, it's not funny. Proof: With both an XP computer and Vista computer, try to delete system32 and see what happens... I'm telling you now, that your Vista install will kick up a stink and continue running. Can't say the same for XP...
a