• Our software update is now concluded. You will need to reset your password to log in. In order to do this, you will have to click "Log in" in the top right corner and then "Forgot your password?".
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

Kids these days...

The Cynic

♥ These Perfect Abattoirs ♥
845
Posts
15
Years


  • This is different. Children wearing thongs isn't appropriate. Children being given an A+ for text-talk in a formal writing isn't appropriate either, but it's permitted, since children don't practice their spelling enough (Spell Check does everything) and texting is popular.

    Children playing on the Internet and texting? All right, but there's a limit. You shouldn't be able to text at the table instead of talking with your parents. If you're texting more than you're eating, there's an issue lol

    Meanwhile, I read up some disturbing things. There are some kids who start masturbating at the age of eight. You don't learn about sex-ed until you're ten, and most parents don't even discuss it until at least ten. I just feel that there's something wrong with a kid, girl and boy, masturbating at eight years of age. I don't think that happened a few decades ago.

    That just shows how awkward and weird the world has changed. Really. Eight? Jeez! Some kids even start dry humping each other at four, saying "It feels good." Seriously, wtf?

    What is so wrong or disturbing about kids wanting to know about their own bodies? They have a right to know! You're suggesting we bring kids up in a little bubble of rainbows and fairies and unicorns and golden pixie dust (so on, so on). Where curiosity is seen as smutty, or even dangerous.

    Also, language is a living, sentient organsim. It evolves. My favourite way of describing language is using this Stephen Fry quote:


    Stephen Fry said:
    Think of London. Some of its outline was determined by the Romans who conquered it two thousand years ago, since then atop the ruins of the Roman, Saxon, Dark Age and Norman London was constructed a medieval city of winding streets, jostling half-timbered mansions and soaring stone cathedrals and churches. Then came, after the Tudor and Jacobean palaces and halls and after the restoration a period of renewed classical elements, the squares and avenues of Georgian and Regency London, elegant, spacious and harmonious. The Victorians brought long suburban streets, warehouses, libraries, schools, town halls and railway stations and in the twentieth century arrived a new architecture, office towers, corporate headquarters, airports, housing projects in glass and concrete, American and European statements of self conscious modernity, statehood, brutalism, socialism, capitalism and democracy. It isn't I think, too much of a strain to see the history of our language in similar terms. A long sticky flypaper onto which at varying times of their importance the church, royalty, aristocracy, industry, commerce and international entertainment have accreted themselves. Saxon and Roman elements overlaid with the Norman French and Chaucerian and Church medieval English. A great renaissance of Shakespeare, the Bible of King James, Milton and Dryden leading into the classical English of Johnson and Pope. The Victorian English of industry, Dickens and music hall giving way to the English of the twentieth century, all the way through the arrival of radio and cinema, the political language of fascism, communism, socialism and finance, the Americanisms, the street talk, the rock and roll, the corporate speak, the computer jargon … and here we are. Glass and concrete sentences right next to half-timbered Elizabethan phrases, a Starbucks of an utterance dwelling in an expression that once belonged to a Victorian banker, an Apple Store of an accent in a converted Georgian merchant's lingo.

    So what if language is now evolving to include text speak? Shakespeare created new language when he was around. Twitter and Facebook are the new Hamlet and Macbeth. Let use be our lexicographer!
     

    Yusshin

    ♪ Yggdrasil ♪
    2,414
    Posts
    14
    Years
  • Kids shouldn't even be thinking about that sort of thing at the age of four, or even eight. That kind of thing creeps into the conscience around ten. At eight, you should only be concerned with your Tonka trucks, Barbies, and the playground. A kid doesn't develop the "wanting to discover their body" thing until at least ten; if they know about it earlier on, they saw something bad on television or something. Psychologically, kids shouldn't become aware of sex or sexual things before puberty even starts (generally, puberty starts between ten and thirteen). If they're taught beforehand and they start acting out like that, then that's abnormal. Kids shouldn't be thinking about sex and self-pleasure when they're eight. There's something wrong there.

    I'll never consider text-talk as a new addition to language; it's merely beating up the language we already have. Sure, terms and whatnaught "evolve" and change, but I will never consider "gr4" to be a word.
     

    Rich Boy Rob

    "Fezzes are cool." The Doctor
    1,051
    Posts
    15
    Years
    • Seen Mar 15, 2016

    Meanwhile, I read up some disturbing things. There are some kids who start masturbating at the age of eight. You don't learn about sex-ed until you're ten, and most parents don't even discuss it until at least ten. I just feel that there's something wrong with a kid, girl and boy, masturbating at eight years of age. I don't think that happened a few decades ago.

    Didn't notice this post before. What do you think is wrong with masturbating then? It has been proven to have no adverse affects and has even been proven to even be good for you, as it reduces blood pressure. I child doesn't need to be taught how to do it anyway, they find out it feels good and so they carry on. And the reason people didn't do it in the past is because it was seen as sinful and made you go blind etc.
     

    Cherrim

    PSA: Blossom Shower theme is BACK ♥
    33,293
    Posts
    21
    Years
  • Kids shouldn't even be thinking about that sort of thing at the age of four, or even eight. That kind of thing creeps into the conscience around ten. At eight, you should only be concerned with your Tonka trucks, Barbies, and the playground. A kid doesn't develop the "wanting to discover their body" thing until at least ten; if they know about it earlier on, they saw something bad on television or something. Psychologically, kids shouldn't become aware of sex or sexual things before puberty even starts (generally, puberty starts between ten and thirteen). If they're taught beforehand and they start acting out like that, then that's abnormal. Kids shouldn't be thinking about sex and self-pleasure when they're eight. There's something wrong there.

    I'll never consider text-talk as a new addition to language; it's merely beating up the language we already have. Sure, terms and whatnaught "evolve" and change, but I will never consider "gr4" to be a word.
    :/

    But if they don't even know what sexual pleasure even is, how is that bad? Just like a kid won't know it's bad to run around without clothes on until you tell them, how can they know better otherwise? :s It most definitely has nothing to do with being taught beforehand but I'm not searching up references for this at work, lmao. Just because WE know masturbation is a sexual activity doesn't mean little kids who discover it do. That's all I'm saying. They aren't necessarily thinking of sexual pleasure, they just know it feels good and this sort of thing is NOT tied to "this generation" of children. So while this could be an argument, I don't feel it belongs in this "complain about the latest generation of pokemon children" thread. D:
     

    Eternal Nightmare

    Stunningly Handsome
    2,150
    Posts
    17
    Years
    • Seen Aug 21, 2015
    Wow at this thread and all the comments <_<.

    Let's just face it yes some of the children in this gen are sex adddicts or even drug addicts but are there not people like that in each gen. Of course. Not all of them are going out buying drugs and getting laid every second. There are some who actually do care for there education and want to grown up to be the best they can be. Also, as said, more kids are getting fat in america. This is true but then again its not like most kids go in the kitchen and cook there own meals. Basically, its the parents fault for screwing up their childs diet.

    Like, when was there ever an age limit on have a cellphone, or Ipod, hell even a Plasma screen TV. Iexactly there isn't one. So what's so bad about a 5 year old having a cellphone. What if the child is in some sort of emergency and there are no phones around for him to call his parents. Does that make it so bad to have a cellphone handy. Ipod...the child may love music so is that so bad.

    Now dont get it twisted I have seen some bad ass children around cursing, wearing revealing clothing, and even talking about sex. Maybe if their parents incorporated more home training and not letting their child walk out the house like some hoochie things would be alright. Down the next gen all you want but its still going to come after us and really their isn't much of a damn thing we can do about it.
     

    Lucy Lu

    Keep On Moving Foward...
    6,195
    Posts
    19
    Years
    • Seen Mar 6, 2014
    Fox♠ said:
    The real reason we're condeming these kids is because we're jealous that we didn't have that much freedom or werent that spoiled.
    I guess I am bit jealous of this generation. When I was younger I have to learn from right from wrong. And I have to work hard to get what I want and need. These days these kids get whatever they want on a silver platter. Some kids are getting away with everything these days. Yeah the parents are a little lax towards some of their children. I was happy that my parents weren't lax with me. They were super strict. And I am glad they were.

    So yeah some of the parents of this generation are to blame, but the more I thought about it...I guess we got a good life going. No one is perfect. It is life. We got to live through it.
     
    Last edited:

    Captain Riolu

    Ace Detective
    431
    Posts
    15
    Years
  • Kids shouldn't even be thinking about that sort of thing at the age of four, or even eight. That kind of thing creeps into the conscience around ten. At eight, you should only be concerned with your Tonka trucks, Barbies, and the playground. A kid doesn't develop the "wanting to discover their body" thing until at least ten; if they know about it earlier on, they saw something bad on television or something. Psychologically, kids shouldn't become aware of sex or sexual things before puberty even starts (generally, puberty starts between ten and thirteen). If they're taught beforehand and they start acting out like that, then that's abnormal. Kids shouldn't be thinking about sex and self-pleasure when they're eight. There's something wrong there.

    I'll never consider text-talk as a new addition to language; it's merely beating up the language we already have. Sure, terms and whatnaught "evolve" and change, but I will never consider "gr4" to be a word.

    Ya know, all it takes is a simple thing like an itch in a place for kid to touch that spot. Heck, it could just happen. They don't need to know what it is to do it. Babies don't know the danger of electricity, yet they can stick a knife into a socket. A kid doesn't need to know of sex when masturbation can be done with one person. Did you have to know how muscles worked to walk? No.


    And text language is just a way of doing things fast. If I was lazy or in a hurry, it would be more efficient to say "lol" instead of "laugh out loud"
     

    The Cynic

    ♥ These Perfect Abattoirs ♥
    845
    Posts
    15
    Years
  • Kids shouldn't even be thinking about that sort of thing at the age of four, or even eight. That kind of thing creeps into the conscience around ten. At eight, you should only be concerned with your Tonka trucks, Barbies, and the playground. A kid doesn't develop the "wanting to discover their body" thing until at least ten; if they know about it earlier on, they saw something bad on television or something. Psychologically, kids shouldn't become aware of sex or sexual things before puberty even starts (generally, puberty starts between ten and thirteen). If they're taught beforehand and they start acting out like that, then that's abnormal. Kids shouldn't be thinking about sex and self-pleasure when they're eight. There's something wrong there.

    I'll never consider text-talk as a new addition to language; it's merely beating up the language we already have. Sure, terms and whatnaught "evolve" and change, but I will never consider "gr4" to be a word.

    Kids are actually aware of sex earlier than you think. A baby, for example, will enjoy getting an e***tion and holding its p***s, a form of masturbation. You may wonder how I know this, I originally wanted to be a psycologist and you'd be surprised how much of that is sexual. Also, what is so wrong about being interested in sex hmm? You seem to have a sort of vendetta against one of the most rudimentary animal instincts; if it feels good do it. That principle decides so much in nature. You know scientists are able to mind control rats by giving it bursts of electricity into the pleasure part of its brain?

    Now what do you consider "beating up" a language? You mean degrading it? Then, in a way, all accents American, Scottish, Welsh, Canadian, South African, Australian, whatever are then, in your eyes, also a horrible ruining of language. That it ridiculous as there is no sigulaer form of any one language. Language can be categorised as, and we owe the French for this, Langue or parole. Language as a concept, and language as utterance respectively. Now what you're saying is that text speak isn't a true form of utterance? Well there's your argument flat on its face already because utterance can be anything. Let me ask you a question. Can you understand text-speak as a form of English? Of course you can! Then it is merely another form of parole and as much a part of the English language as the words I am typing, and spelling "correctly", now.


    Note: I censored some words in paragraph 1 as I'm not sure which words PC consider to be innapropriate so I've just gone ahead and blanked them.
     

    Chibi-chan

    The Freshmaker!
    10,027
    Posts
    19
    Years
  • Whoah Whoah Whoah @_____@

    Sexual discussions are not allowed in OC. Please change the conversation back to wear it's supposed to be or I will have to close this thread...
    Giving a forwarning before one bad apple ends a good discussion.
     

    Eternal Nightmare

    Stunningly Handsome
    2,150
    Posts
    17
    Years
    • Seen Aug 21, 2015
    Whoah Whoah Whoah @_____@

    Sexual discussions are not allowed in OC. Please change the conversation back to wear it's supposed to be or I will have to close this thread...
    Giving a forwarning before one bad apple ends a good discussion.

    Aye aye captain :3. Um...what was the original question again -goes to check-
     

    Captain Riolu

    Ace Detective
    431
    Posts
    15
    Years
  • Whoah Whoah Whoah @_____@

    Sexual discussions are not allowed in OC. Please change the conversation back to wear it's supposed to be or I will have to close this thread...
    Giving a forwarning before one bad apple ends a good discussion.

    0_0


    So......how's about them pants-sagging these kids be doin'?

    >_>

    <_<
     
    2,096
    Posts
    15
    Years
  • Texting hurts no one, get off your high horse.

    actually some girl in Britain texted so much that she got sever carpel tunnel and had to have an operation so she didn't have to wear a frame over her wrists.

    and every generation kids think of a new think to do to get into trouble, parents just need to think of new ways to discipline. step up to the plate adults!
     

    shookie

    Often scatters things.
    851
    Posts
    14
    Years
  • actually some girl in Britain texted so much that she got sever carpel tunnel and had to have an operation so she didn't have to wear a frame over her wrists.
    Excessive texting can be harmful. Excessive anything can be harmful. I scooped ice cream for seven months and have to go to physical therapy for my wrist(s) because of the injuries it caused, but I also have an underlying joint condition that made it 10 times worse (the diagnosis was why I quit). That doesn't mean scooping ice cream is bad for you.
     
    74
    Posts
    14
    Years
  • Oh, you did not just go there. :x

    You're actually telling us what we have the right and what we don't have the right to do? What, because you're 21 you have the right to tell other people that are younger than you what to do? No, you do not. Get lost.


    And this is why I usually just dont bother.
    Way to jump to conclusions, maybe you should read things a bit better first huh?
    It was a rhetorical question to begin with, surely you know what they are. I never told anyone what rights they have.
    Secondly, I never said I was better than anyone regardless of my age. Whether I think or not. Id raise an equality issue but its offtopic and unnecessary for now.
    Thirdly, why get so defensive? Im allowed my opinion just like everyone else.

    Have a little maturity and class and read things properly before you go and jump to conclusions again.
     

    Honest

    Hi!
    11,676
    Posts
    15
    Years
  • Haha, I know it's a terrible thing to say, but I can't wait for the kids in this generation to become adults. Then I'll watch them screw there lives up.... oh hang on, I'm a part of this generation. -_-

    Anyway's yes, this generation is totally screwed for the future.
     
    17,600
    Posts
    19
    Years
    • Seen May 9, 2024
    Why are people blaming the children on their materialism when everyone is materialistic to one extent or another? Additionally, it isn't as if the children go out and buy it, so if you disagree with how they have some materialistic things, then you shouldn't be blaming it on the children; but the parents. They're the ones who likely use their money to buy these things for them. Personally, the only thing I see no need for a child under the age of 13 is a cellphone.

    When I worked at CVS, there was a seven year old with an iPhone. Her sister, who looked about eleven was also using her iPhone. They were both talking to their friends. I thought to myself "Damn, how the hell can a parent do that to their kids? They're going to grow up to think they can get anything they want." And it's true, there are some people who get spoiled as a kid and grow up to believe that they are the center of the universe and the world and everyone on it revolves around them and them alone. And that isn't their fault. They were raised that way.

    Materialism isn't always bad, like I pointed out in the beginning, and it should not be put on the children as if they're at fault. We live in a world where people want materialistic things. It only gets bad if the parent doesn't know how to tell a child no when they demand, argue, or ask for things that they have no need for. I understand most parents want the best for their children and want them to be happy, but sometimes you have to make sacrifices to your child's happiness (getting them everything they want) to teach them valuable life lessons that very few people living in today's world learn.

    Anyway, materialism isn't the problem. A lot of children these days feed off of each other negatively, which is what I've come to know from exhibiting my brother's behavior around his friends. They believe being rude, telling people off, cursing, acting as though they're tough, or acting as though they're superior to someone else is cool and makes them look good. Face it, throughout school, there's nothing more than most kids want than to fit in with other kids. Depending on the environment and what environment you put you child in affects how that child's personality is. That's the one thing I hate about school systems. With all these kids in one place, personalities collide, values can change, beliefs parents install in their children can change.

    I'm actually afraid of placing a child in an environment where the majority kids act like hooligans and hoodlums. Because those are the ones that have the strong impact on children these days. Especially with all the praise in the culture today, which encourages sex and other mature topics to be brought into their childhood.

    But of course this does not apply to every child. There are those who were raised with values and beliefs by their parents. Those who think before they speak and who treat others around them with respect and gain respect from respectful individuals themselves. But, you know what they say, one bad apple spoils the bunch. Maybe that's why so many adults have such a negative view on not only children, but any young individual living today.

    Children learn from observing people around them. Everyone learns like that all their life, actually. So many things impact the way a child behaves, but I've found that since all of a child's childhood is involved with school and other children, a lot of the behaviors other children have impact another. We don't know what happens in the family girl next door's house or the boy living with his step-father down the street when their doors close. For all you know they have an older sibling who doesn't care that they use language like that around their younger siblings. That goes on to the child, the child uses that language at school, other kids learn the word and start using it the same way. It's just a domino effect.

    So yeah, don't blame the children on how they act because they're at a time where they're learning right from wrong and that's when they develop most of their behaviors. All from what they see around them.
     

    ANARCHit3cht

    Call me Archie!
    2,145
    Posts
    15
    Years
    • Seen Sep 25, 2020
    Most fault does not lie in the children, it lies in who raised them. Then, once the child grows up(or even before) it is their choice to retain the way of life they were raised by their parents.

    Also, I know more "good" kids than I do "bad"
     

    Kura

    twitter.com/puccarts
    10,994
    Posts
    19
    Years
  • I don't know if it's really the kids or what they're exposed to.. I think it's mostly the lack of ambition I notice in this generation because a lot of stuff is becoming materialistic and kids seem to start getting a weekly "allowance" (like $20) for doing absolutely nothing. (Can a 12 year old kid put their dishes away? Yeah. It's not that freaking hard. And do your freaking homework. You might hate it but your parents are paying for the food on that table so you might as well make the best of it and LEARN something.) The moms should stop giving in and actually discipline a bratty child.
     

    Throat

    Oldschool pokemon
    346
    Posts
    14
    Years
  • Kids are silly everywhere, everytime, every generation, that's just normal. About the over weight and adult content exposing, they can be managed by conscious parents. The bullying can be avoided in the beginning by talking to kids when they don't seem silly. Life isn't too hard nowadays, guys, the problems are just clearer.
     

    Guillermo

    i own a rabbit heh
    6,796
    Posts
    15
    Years
  • And this is why I usually just dont bother.
    Way to jump to conclusions, maybe you should read things a bit better first huh?
    It was a rhetorical question to begin with, surely you know what they are. I never told anyone what rights they have.
    Secondly, I never said I was better than anyone regardless of my age. Whether I think or not. Id raise an equality issue but its offtopic and unnecessary for now.
    Thirdly, why get so defensive? Im allowed my opinion just like everyone else.

    Have a little maturity and class and read things properly before you go and jump to conclusions again.
    Pal, asking why I'm getting defensive is a stupid question. You just attacked younger aged kids, like myself. You're allowed your opinion, but if it's attacking others then you have no right to speak it. Even if it was a rhetorical question, you meant what you mean.
     
    Back
    Top