Pokémon Chit-Chat

Status
Not open for further replies.
Basically, it boils down to its structure. You certainly see more gems with in crystal form than you see metals in that form. Quartz is a prime example. But you are correct in that almost all metals exist in a polycrystalline state.
 
I don't expect to see a 3rd game (if there even will be one!) announced until like, next year.
Dunno, it's probably just me but they've got enough other things coming out right now. D/P will have be en out for 2 years by September 31st, so... wait till then IMO.
 
It's just no good speculating about the third game yet. It's been done much, already though....

Shadow, I actually understood your crystal-explanation ^^ Thanks!
 
Ok then... maybe they WONT have a third game for a change? That would really be refreshing.
Maybe they'll release two new versions directly for wii. Not adding a new generation, but more role playing....
I've discussed this before as well XD
 
Virtual Headache said:
Well, all we know that Nintendo has registered some domains which could be the names for the 3rd game. I wouldn't know what they could add anyway. You already can get every Pokémon so you wouldn't really have to buy the 3rd game.
Click to expand...

Yeah, but the thing with 3rd versions is the added features, like the battle frontier in emerald. And get every pokemon? I havn't heard about arceus yet, ever think about having the event in the third game? hmmmmm. They also could improve wifi features and many other things.

There will be a sequel/3rd game, no doubt in my mind.

I wouldn't at all be surprised if they settle in the taste of johto, a tad, and give us some boat to go there. Would not surprise me, but unlikely. *shrugs*

They will have a sequel, that's pokemon, and we're still goin' to buy it anyways because it's the next version. And besides.... what does pokemon want? $$$$$$ Exactly.

Also, I think the name might be Oynx if giratina happens to be the cover "it", but may be too close to the pokemon Oynx. Oh well. =P
 
Weird how there was almost no legendary Pokémon in the original versions, but now the legendaries ARE the versions, and the story.
 
Fable-chan said:
Weird how there was almost no legendary Pokémon in the original versions, but now the legendaries ARE the versions, and the story.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I'm disappointed in that fact, I'm okay with 5 for a series, but now we have like 50 in D/P.

I wish we couldbe like the old days with fewer legendaries.

If they happen to make a 5th game, I hope they don't go overboard, just go back and hit ground and lower the legend count.

As legends are losing their "legendary" majestic feel.

Such as Zapdos feels more like legendary then Dailga.
 
If they have a new ds game it will be based on giratina there where going to be three games but one wasnt completed that is the giratina one . i think there should be a new johto game for ds which would be cool. New topic which is better diamond or pearl i think diamond beacause dialga can beat palkia beacause he has no weaknees to dragon
 
The legendary birds had a legendary-feeling in R/B/Y :) And the legendary beasts had too. Then the legendary trio-thingy went overboard with the elves in D/P and the regis in R/S/E.....

I agree with Beachy.
 
Mectricmon said:
If they have a new ds game it will be based on giratina there where going to be three games but one wasnt completed that is the giratina one . i think there should be a new johto game for ds which would be cool. New topic which is better diamond or pearl i think diamond beacause dialga can beat palkia beacause he has no weaknees to dragon
Click to expand...

I don't care what you people say; Mectricmon is my favourite member of all time.

As for the Legendaries, yes, their novelty is wearing off and the amount that were put in Diamond and Pearl was horrific. It just tell us that the creators of Pokèmon are running out of ideas.
 
Ok Oni, I just printscreened your post XD I feel I want to keep it for future rainy days.

The ideas of Pokémon are out btw. I really can't imagine a full 5th gen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top