NarutoActor
The rocks cry out to me
- 1,974
- Posts
- 16
- Years
- Age 31
- Brooklyn/Marlboro
- Seen Apr 2, 2016
Ah a Logical fallacies.
As well as the other people who have used the term "100%" when stating their sexual orientation. In that other sexual orientation thread, Shining Raichu made the same claim and I would like to refer you all to my response here where I explain why it is incorrect to make such a claim.
As for me, I'm pretty sure I'm heterosexual.
I'll make 3 points
First you are stating a presumption, since the right answer is not 100% known, the current answer must be false. That current answer might, or might not be false. A truth can exist regardless if one is aware of the truth, or has proven said, or even if they disagree with that truth.
*Example, If I was to say " I will live to be 98 years old". You may say, "How can you know that unless you die" But lets say I did live to 98, but in my initial claim, I was right, and even if I had poor reasoning the statement "I will live to be 98" was truth. (I guess that is not the best example, but it will do)
The logic that if you can't meet every female, then you can not be 100% sure. That makes the second assumption that, every female is different. Some may say that we are very different people, and no two people are the same, but genetically we are all 99.9% The same.
3rd, once a pattern is established, one can assume said pattern would continue unless proven wrong, as such it is logically fine to say that a person is 100% sure, since all the evidence points to that direction. If that rule is not followed then nothing can be true 100%.
In conclusion, you can not logically say that, that a person cann't be 100% sure.