• Our friends from the Johto Times are hosting a favorite Pokémon poll - and we'd love for you to participate! Click here for information on how to vote for your favorites!
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.

Sexual orientation?

Sexual orientation?

  • Heterosexual

    Votes: 43 48.9%
  • Bisexual/Pansexual

    Votes: 13 14.8%
  • Homosexual

    Votes: 16 18.2%
  • Asexual

    Votes: 6 6.8%
  • Other/Unsure/Questioning

    Votes: 10 11.4%

  • Total voters
    88

As well as the other people who have used the term "100%" when stating their sexual orientation. In that other sexual orientation thread, Shining Raichu made the same claim and I would like to refer you all to my response here where I explain why it is incorrect to make such a claim.
As for me, I'm pretty sure I'm heterosexual.
Ah a Logical fallacies.
I'll make 3 points

First you are stating a presumption, since the right answer is not 100% known, the current answer must be false. That current answer might, or might not be false. A truth can exist regardless if one is aware of the truth, or has proven said, or even if they disagree with that truth.
*Example, If I was to say " I will live to be 98 years old". You may say, "How can you know that unless you die" But lets say I did live to 98, but in my initial claim, I was right, and even if I had poor reasoning the statement "I will live to be 98" was truth. (I guess that is not the best example, but it will do)

The logic that if you can't meet every female, then you can not be 100% sure. That makes the second assumption that, every female is different. Some may say that we are very different people, and no two people are the same, but genetically we are all 99.9% The same.

3rd, once a pattern is established, one can assume said pattern would continue unless proven wrong, as such it is logically fine to say that a person is 100% sure, since all the evidence points to that direction. If that rule is not followed then nothing can be true 100%.

In conclusion, you can not logically say that, that a person cann't be 100% sure.
 
Drakow said:
You see! He has learnt his lesson!

I actually never saw the post you made in the other thread until I clicked your link just now lmao. You may think it's impossible to claim to be 100% homosexual, but I most definitely stand by it! People often marvel at my impressive ability to accomplish the impossible, and I can't imagine why this instance should be any different :P
 
I've been Asexual until I was 20, because I was never really attracted to anyone. But, I would say I'm Heterosexual now, because I've grown out of that stage.
 
Well... I think I'm bisexual. I've only ever been with women, but I seem to find attraction towards both. So... not 100% sure, so I voted unsure/questioning.
 
I'm straight. I've only been attracted to females and can't see that changing at any time in the future. Not in a relationship right now though and haven't ever really been in a "serious" relationship (read: beyond a few dates) but I'm definitely attracted to the opposite sex rather than the same sex.
 
Er, I'm bisexual, though it's more pansexual, because at this point I've pretty much landed on the fact that I'm attracted to the person for themselves rather than what's in their pants. When I'm actively looking I do lean a bit more towards females, but I can fall for males (its just uncommon), and I do currently have a boyfriend, which is going pretty smoothly.
 
I would consider myself bicurious. Sure I've never had a girlfriend, but I've had many girl crushes that were/are actually more serious than just a friend or admiration sorta thing.
 
Bisexual, & simply stated, it started with the question of "why not?". More to it now though, but I'd rather build my reasoning completely than share it first.
 
I'm straight. Oddly enough, I have a really hard time finding myself attracted to a person. The number of girls I've actually felt any real attraction to is only six... which I'm guessing is low but that's just how it is for me. I have to have something beyond the derp physical thing.

I have had people ask me if I'm gay or straight though. I guess it's because I don't talk about the opposite sex? Maybe I'm just not interested. Hmm. I wonder.
 
I'm a heterosexual. Always been attracted to girls since age 12.

Apparently, I'm also a metrosexual according to friends. For the longest time, I had no idea what that meant. Turns out it means I dress sexy or something. =P
 
Super-gay.

Nah, just a bit homosexual actually. When I was younger (12-14?) I identified as bisexual, not because I was in denial necessarily, just I flirted with a lot of girls and relationships weren't at all sexual for either gender - so it was more biromantic or whatever I guess. YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN.
 
I am attracted to females, but not males.
 
I'm heterosexual. I've never thought about being with another girl or am attracted to girls that way.
 
I'm straight -- not interested in dating men in any way.
 
Je suis straight. There was a little bit of a questioning period when I was younger, but that's all gone now. :D
 
Back
Top