:/ There was some game they were showing off at E3 where the entire point of the game seemed to be to kill people in ridiculous ways. It was described like if you took the premise of the Tony Hawk games (get as high a combo as possible with different tricks) met FPS. It looked so incredibly boring.
:( Violent games just aren't my thing. I don't see the point in mindless violence. It's not fun. And that is why the FPS genre gets so much bad rap for being overrated. Each game is the same thing with a different setting. (Arguably, all genres are like this but I notice it so much more in FPS because even the locales and settings look the same.)
I'll bet any amount of money that about 80% of current FPS's are either in the distant future or about World War II.
And then there's the billion dollar exception to that rule that currently dominates the sales of FPS games.
Which is a mediocre game at best. With the sole exception of Modern Warfare, Call of Duty was a below average FPS to me.
Your arms move as if you were playing as Michael J. Fox. :/
That's how all sorts of physics engines make games appear... :\
I never bothered to play other games that were akin to Call of Duty. Why add realism in a game when it detracts from the fun?
Realism doesn't have to detract from the experience, Luck.
True, but I honestly can't remember a game where realism added significantly to the experience apart from the standard FPS.
Son of a submariner, don't you know who Kefka is?!
Some of us only touched the Final Fantasy series with Tactics Advance and the first 5 minutes of FFX.