- 7,676
- Posts
- 17
- Years
- Age 35
- Brisbane, Australia
- Seen Sep 30, 2021
but you were talking about colours that weren't on the list before
No... Bubblegum Pink is not kosher D:
No... Bubblegum Pink is not kosher D:
Magenta is sexy ^^Which is why I said, if it wins, to change the color.
To either Hot Pink or Magenta. ;)
I see you were forced to write "Do not vote if you are not a supporter" next to each possible choice? This is sad. I guess blue has a definable lead?
Yes I was forced. And I think a non-supporter still voted after that. :(
Better idea: Why not just make more user-groups and let donators choose their colour?If you disagree with this or have a better idea, say so.
There will only be one colour.
The problem with letting you guys pick your own colour is that there are a lot more supporters than any other coloured group on PC. So it's really hard to find a colour that everyone can agree with. While I agree a logical solution could be to have several colours and let the supporters choose, that's just not going to happen. We toyed with the idea back when the moderators wanted pink, ages ago, and decided it was too much of a hassle. As some of you may know, a lot of members are still confused over the ranks. Some think supporters are admins, some can't tell mods from s-mods from admins, and some just think all those with a coloured name are staff. Adding TWO colours for ONE usergroup? That would be chaos. Not only would everyone have to deal with confusion over usergroups, but we'd have to make 10 usergroups for the supporters. That's a lot of clutter in the admin CP. Finally, we have a lot of coloured usergroups and I personally feel that having one more, without a good reason (no, getting your favourite colour isn't a good reason), is just overkill. We've already got a pretty decent rainbow going on over on the who's online section. That's honestly enough.