• Ever thought it'd be cool to have your art, writing, or challenge runs featured on PokéCommunity? Click here for info - we'd love to spotlight your work!
  • Welcome to PokéCommunity! Register now and join one of the best fan communities on the 'net to talk Pokémon and more! We are not affiliated with The Pokémon Company or Nintendo.
    Register

Agree or Disagree (2.0)

Disagree, I need work to accomplish my life goals. It's that or I end up living on the streets in the future.

Hardships roughly shape you, but it is love from others that chisels away the jagged edges.
 
Speaking of love from others to a loner huh... 😔

Hmm... idk. It's not like hardships are the only things that end up shaping a person, even though they are probably the most effective ones...

I'm not sure what to do here. I'm leaning most towards Disagreeing simply because I've never really experienced the second part. Perhaps it might still one day happen, but until then...


Laughter is the best medicine when you're feeling down.
 
Being alone also suggests a lack of interactions, be they virtual or real. Therefore, if I am alone at home, I am not together with all the people that are alone in their respective home. Thus, disagree.

Being smart isn't really a gift.


stringzzz said:
Disagree, forcing yourself to type in a password every time makes sure you memorize it. If for some reason you lose access to the saved passwords, how will you be able to remember them? It does get frustrating if you have a different password for every account, but security can often come at the cost of lowering convenience.
Click to expand...
My feeling is that, it's easier to forget a password, above all if you have 150 different passwords, than to lose saved passwords ^^"
 
Unfortunately humans are quite adept at deception and it can be quite hard to tell if someone is really your friend irl let alone online. Not all friends are actual friends in my experience. Which would be a disagree.
However if this is just about how you communicate with them and distance being irrelevant to someone being a friend I'd agree as those things matter not.

Everyone should pick up a hobby they like.
 
I mean, seems mandatory to me, alright. What else are you going to do with your life? Working? That's just miserable. You can take it from me who has been there on multiple occasions. ^^"

Our society's demands don't allow everyone to actually plan their life in a way they can enjoy it.
 
I feel like society's demands puts a kind of limit on just how someone will live their lives, while some may wish for a totally different lifestyle but can't have it. In general, I feel like most people learn these limits as we grow up, so we end up planning our lives around these limits, but this isn't true for everyone, and you said 'don't allow everyone', so I will say I agree.

Trust is completely up to an individual's judgement of the person, it's never right for said person to say "You can trust me." to the individual.
 
I'm just gonna snap this in half:
"Trust is completely up to an individual's judgement of the person," - Agreed. Everyone should decide for themselves who they consider trustworthy as well as the reasoning as to why.

"it's never right for said person to say 'You can trust me.' to the individual." - Eh. It does get abused a lot which makes me wanna Agree.
However, never is a pretty big word and it also depends on the situation imo. But anyway, if you already trust someone and they say that... does it suddenly become not right for them to say it? You already trust them. Perhaps said person is just trying to help you overcome something you otherwise wouldn't try. Or perhaps they're trying to abuse it, but there's no way to tell that beforehand.
I'll Disagree with the second part due to the word never.

People often don't appreciate what they have until it is taken from them and are left without it.
 
WHAT DO YOU MEAN I'M NOT CRAZYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
I don't feel these two concepts are related. Being creative means you have a lot going on in your head, which I wouldn't say makes you crazy?

Pokémons should be less object-shaped.

_confused_piplup_ said:
Pokemon should go back to no gimmick in newer games.
Click to expand...
Beside my custom gimmick wait for my update before playing my fangame and that gimmick by Lucidious, I don't see what more they can invent... So I would agree, but not because they "should" (meaning "it would be better if they did") but because they "should" (meaning, "they will eventually run out of ideas").
 
I don't mind most object based Pokemon. Voltorb/Electrode and the Klink line come to mind as imo bad ones.
But there's also stuff like the Litwick line, Klefki, Comfey, Baltoy/Claydol etc. which I do like.
I'll disagree.

Valve will never make a game with 3 in the title in a game series. (Portal 2, Left 4 Dead 2, Team Fortress 2, etc.)
 
So any form of consumerism is unethical then? what about vegan or vegetarian products whose purpose is to be more ethical than eating animal products?
I'll just disagree as my brain is jumping down various trains of thought and the phrase is too vague for me to decide what to even go with.


Health care shouldn't be run through capitalism.
Just compare the prices of various medicines and operations in the US to that of the rest of the Western world =P
 
It's basically at the point where the more money you have, the more likely you are to survive longer. I don't think it should really be like that, but my opinion is weak due to me not really understanding politics and how the system really works. But I'll say agree.

The problems outweigh the supposed benefits of people using drugs recreationally.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top