6th Gen Are Pokémon X/Y characters chibi?

Depends on how exactly one defines chibi, but I think that a lot of people would classify them as chibi.
 
like sorta? but not? idk how to describe, i guess it's like what nah said that it just kind of depends on who you ask. i'm on the fence lol but i mean overall, it's not like i have an issue w the character models/designs for gen 6. i do prefer them in 7 and 8, though, neither of which i would consider chibi.
 
like sorta? but not? idk how to describe, i guess it's like what nah said that it just kind of depends on who you ask. i'm on the fence lol but i mean overall, it's not like i have an issue w the character models/designs for gen 6. i do prefer them in 7 and 8, though, neither of which i would consider chibi.

yes, i can't say as well, but i have never thought they could be chibi. in the new bdsp is pretty clear, in gen 6 games I just think they're weirdly proportioned, the weird thing is the head being a lil bigger than the rest of the body but in general i'd say they're not chibi, even because the characters are children, therefore they're short, but idk some people say they are...
 
For me there have always been different chibi "styles". Some focusing more on a bigger head and a smaller body, others trying to balance things a little bit better, etc.

I think I've heard that actual chibi style tries to imitate the anatomy of a toddler. That is, the head is still pretty big, but the body also happens to be long enough to be somewhat believable.

I think, I'd say they are. At least given the shape of the models it kinda makes sense to me.
 
I don't really see it. Their heads are proportional to their bodies honestly.
 
I originally didn't consider them chibis, but I have seen so many people call XYORAS and even SM all called chibis. So I guess it depends on the people? I consider chibis more like the Funko Pops and the graphics in BDSP
 
Back
Top