Blarzigord: The Uprising [Epilogue]

Status
Not open for further replies.
God damn, we need to catch the Feeder.

I'll try to look for hints in the post, but so far I have found nothing.
 
BTW I have an important fact about being able to kill the feeder, it involves the interceptor and some wordplay between roles. If anyone wants more info I'll post it after this LoL game, but I think it should be saved until we have bigger leads.
 
Well we still have to find out who it is u_u
 
Quite the smart feeder we have... Kills the one person on the list who voted for GreyBidoof to die (presumably to defend Klippy)...

I mean... who am i? what am I doing here?... What is love? (baby don't hurt me)
 
Well, just a suggestion, but we still have the High Priest, which is the Blarzigordian equivalent of the Interceptor. I mean, if we manage to get three people to debate on, we lynch one, and have the roleblockers block the other two. That way, it'll be much faster...

Also don't worry doof, we will kill that brainwasher guy. My mind is still a bit hazy but memories are somewhat coming back... I still hold that grudge against that guy.

EDIT: Just compiled Feeder's list for the night

Sonata as ???
Ash as ???
Candy as ???
No as ???
apocalypseArisen as ???
Lycanthropy as ???
Orpheus as ???
arachnidsGrip as ???
Lucid as ???
Jupiter as ???
Netto Azure as ???
Christos as ???
Melody as ???
Nakuzami as ???
Mana as ???

Pretty big list if you ask me.
 
Last edited:
Damn it.

*Slams Table.*

If only I had anticipated the bomb... maybe Bid00f could have been saved, maybe-

Orpheus said:
Thank god I don't have to post in poetry, I ****ing hate poetry.
Click to expand...

Bruh. Hold the phone on everything else for a second, there's an issue here. Poetry is the most beautiful use of writing in a moment. What of the greats? Yeats? Plath? Frost? Dickinson? If you hate them sir then you clearly have no class. For shame.

Now, where was I?

Also I wonder if the feeder chose carefully like the not-dead Bid00f said... or just picked randomly? Are we dealing with a planning sociopath? Or a psychopathic random mess? Do you think maybe the Feeder might be aware of who is a Blarzigodian and who is not? Might he (or she, let's not forget) receive direct information from Blarzigord itself on the matter? I mean the feeder has a direct connection to Blarzigord in a sense right?

Still that's all "conspiracy Keanu" type idea making... and I suppose it's irrelevant for now anyway, I'm just glad the feeder can't target me tonight and that regardless of his/her reasoning they managed to get another Blarzigordian out of the picture.

I would have said something about Gunner making the list and making it easier for the Feeder to pick their targets. But to be honest anybody can count whom has so many posts so it's not really an issue. In case anyone follows that line of thought, plus she makes a good point as to a way to potentially remove the Feeder in the future. I'm still new to this so I'm not entirely sure how every role works but if I understand what she's saying then if we can get three suspects and one is definitely the feeder then her plan is full proof and I say we follow through with it once we get more information.

However perhaps if the "riddles" get tougher down the line, we should refrain from discussing the answers openly? If the feeder gets it wrong they die right? If we're lucky they might just be an idiot at some point and royally mess up.

On the topic of the feeder, I am interested in what the living Bid00f means when he says "wordplay between roles" in relation to a way of routing said feeder out. But I'll leave that to him to explain, should he desire to.

But now the question instead goes to lynching. Whom is still suspicious? We presumably lost a detective in GB so it falls to us ourselves to dig up potential leads.
 
Bardothren said:
So... we can't stop the feeder tonight. Should we publicly announce particular members we choose to protect, to keep the feeder on his toes?
Click to expand...

I suppose that's about all we can do to them at this point right? I'm alright with that.

To be honest, since living Bidoof doesn't have over 1000 posts he can't be targeted. Other than that, Gunner has been the other major contender in attacking the Feeders actions and coming up with logical solutions. That makes her a threat to the feeder.

And when the Feeder has the opportunity to remove the risk, I'd hasten to say that they would. But that's of course only assumption.

I propose that Agent Mark protects Gunner so that the Feeder can't kill her, then if we're lucky she won't be targeted by Day 3's riddle and the threat to her and any ideas present or future that she might have to deal with the Feeder can be protected.

Opinions?
 
Actually the high priest cannot kill the Feeder. The priest negates and the interceptor prevents and in the Feeder's description it says if prevented he/she dies. They are similar, but negating the Feeder's effect would also negate the effect of him/her dying if he/she doesn't kill. Preventing is just taking away the power to use the night action.

We have very clever GMs with us.

I vote we don't protect anyone on the feeder's list, just because someone may be of use during the day phase doesn't mean they're here to help at night, and they could always be recruited by the Blasphemer or Blarzigord's recruiter.
 
Last edited:
But it also says there that if the Feeder fails to do their duty, they must die... If for some reason, they still live, no one would die, and we know something is up, and we can choose between those two people. I still think that idea is still good, and I do have to agree with not protecting anyone just yet. If we feel the need to protect someone, we should think it through.
 
Bardothren said:
My thought was to individually say, as the Agent, that we shall protect particular people. This way, the feeder, not knowing who will be protected, will target someone protected by a Blarzigordian, lest they fall prey to the secret agent. If this happens, then we off whoever protected the victim. Of course, this plan carries the risk that the feeder chooses to take the risk anyways.
Click to expand...

What?
 
Deceptio said:
Bruh. Hold the phone on everything else for a second, there's an issue here. Poetry is the most beautiful use of writing in a moment. What of the greats? Yeats? Plath? Frost? Dickinson? If you hate them sir then you clearly have no class. For shame.
Click to expand...
Guess I don't have any class then. It's not like that matters to me anyway.
 
Bidoof FTW said:
Quite the smart feeder we have... Kills the one person on the list who voted for GreyBidoof to die
Click to expand...

I think this may be the way to go, actually. It might be worth taking a look at some of the earlier votes for GB to see where the Blarzigordians may be hiding. Those who were around would likely have taken the chance to try and sway the votes in their favour and away from one of their own.
 
I already made a Game Theory joke tyvm.
Also I made a full list in case anyone wanted it
Spoiler:
 
I maintained my vote because the way in which GB was playing seemed suspicious; not like how one would expect a . . . crap it's not the Seer haha . . . uuuuh the Agent to act. I legitimately thought he could be the Feeder, but I was wrong. I would say "sadly," but the Feeder did manage to kill a Blarzigordian. The chances of that happening again, though, are slim, so we shouldn't ignore the Feeder or consider them an asset.

In the end, I suppose it didn't really matter who we voted for, since both Klippy and GB died. Keep in mind that the "he voted for them so he's evil" approach isn't usually that sound. Often if the outlook is bleak, the mafia will vote to kill off their own. I would know, because I've done so in the past.
 
Later on, sure, the mafia would most likely jump ship. Earlier on the odds were not favouring GB though, and mafia would have no reason to hesitate to vote him off, as they would be aware he was one of their own. The only reason GB didn't end up being lynched was his reveal as Investigator.

I agree we have to be careful about it, as people from the masses would have also been tangled up in the mess. It seems most likely that IF any Blarzigordians voted earlier, they would have voted for GB, is all I'm saying.

In this case, Christos seems like an unlikely candidate for Blarzigordian... although we cannot rule them out as feeder.

I think maintaining a vote is also not strictly a sign of Blarzigordian loyalty. Most Blarzigordians are liable to turn tail when the tide is changed to keep from arousing suspicion, and maintaining your vote for the non-Blarzigordian candidate is one way to do that. On the other hand, they could have been hoping for the tide to change later.

Basically, those that changed their vote or voted after the tides had turned are just as likely to be Blarzigordian.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top