Gonna respond down the list;
Sonata pulled out some accurate and correct figures that can only be deemed as dodgy by someone with something to hide.
Early suspicions? Based on what exactly? Where did he ever give you reason, outside of the day/night posts, to suspect him?
How does this point even relate to the debate at hand? Are you trying to throw the topic off? That's suspicious if you are, but as this is a list of "what you know" (sarcasm is also present here, slightly) I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.
Sonata voted you, likely because of a guess. Not for any valid or incriminating reason, but simply because we didn't have enough information to kill a lycan guaranteed. Considering you didn't even rack up any considerable numbers of votes, I don't understand what your issue here is.
You've just now voted Sonata, and everyone has jumped on your bandwagon, without noticing the wheels are about to fall off, because your debate here is very very flawed.
What suspicions are these exactly? You've mentioned them twice now, without stating what they are. Either give us some actual information, or your point is invalid.
Sonata claims to be a Seer Ascendant with a very plausible and fitting description of the role, as I have already explained.
How do you just suddenly REALISE you're the Seer Ascendant exactly? You would have known from the beginning that you are the Seer Ascendant and not just have figured it out from sudden epiphany.
Everyone starts voting jumping onto a bandwagon you suspiciously started with no real valid argument for doing so.
Your argument has so many holes in it and isn't convincing at all my friend. It seems to me that you are trying to pull a tactic similar to ComicFanatic did in Hunger Games. That didn't work, and it won't work here either, especially when your argument is built off of pure speculation, the details of which you haven't even listed, outside of claiming that Sonata has "stolen" your role. He may well have done, but I don't see that as the likely outcome, when you don't even have a valid argument against him. You have only your word, which to me doesn't count for much at the moment. Time to switch tunes dude.
Why would you put a target on yourself when you have no information to give us? What's the point? You're simply preventing your role from having any impact at all anyway. But that wouldn't matter if you were confident you weren't going to be killed in the night phase, which would imply you have the support of the lycans. Now, I'm not jumping to conclusions, but your behaviour just doesn't add up at all. You need to think about your actions and their consequences before you let your mouth run loose like this. No, you've dug your hole too deep in my books. That's it.
That is my very intention at the moment my friend. Assuming Sonata makes it through the night, we can follow his plan tomorrow. If he dies, and Shak was right, Sonata dies. If Sonata was right, but dies in the night, we can still lynch Sopheria tomorrow.
Erm, it quite clearly does have an ability, but you haven't said anything that even gives an idea you know what your role does. Sonata has done just that, and is at least trying to act like he's using it, should he not actually have the role. All you have done is state that you are the Seer Ascendant and not Sonata, and expect us to suddenly all kill Sonata with no proof at all? Dude, you're playing this game wrong, I'm afraid.
Actually, thinking and acting in unison is exactly what we should do. That way the lycans have to blend in and subtly influence our decisions, lest they reveal themselves accidentally and get themselves killed. Acting and banding together is the safest, most efficient way we can route them out.
And you don't have to be convinced by Sonata yet, but when it's a toss up between Shak and Sonata, I think it's pretty clear who has at least played the game right. Shak is simply throwing around accusations and not actually giving any information at all, all in a glossed up manner. That is exactly the behaviour of someone actively trying to influence people. Which is very suspicious behaviour to take in a game like this. Of course, you can say; "But Aiden, you're trying to influence us too!" But the difference is, I am only basing my arguments off of things we know have happened. I will not argue against a point, should I not have actual evidence to back it up.
At this point my intentions and arguments are clear. Whether you listen to them or not is up to you, but I would strongly advise not listening to Shak's arguments for the time being.
[KILL]: Shak
