- 26,066
- Posts
- 13
- Years
- Age 29
- Australia
- Seen yesterday
Basically what the title says. Is a disability or mental illness necessarily an excuse for acting in poor taste, breaking rules or even circumventing the law?
Mmm, I think it depends on the disability? A lot of disabilities come with a developmental delay so maybe the person just doesn't know? I think educating the person on what is right and wrong would work better then punishing them, if they're developmentally delayed.
There is no excuse for committing a crime! If you have a mental disability, get it checked instead of blaming it for your poor decision-making!
I think it mostly depends on the person's reason for needing to give an excuse in the first place. For example, if someone uses their disability as an excuse for stealing or another crime, it's not an excuse. There is no excuse for committing a crime! If you have a mental disability, get it checked instead of blaming it for your poor decision-making!
On the other hand, with disorders like ADHD, I sort of see a gray area in school or work-related situations. For example, if someone has ADHD and they are not doing well in school, I see it as a contributor to their poor grades, thus it is a legitimate excuse for needing extra help and the like. However, it is not an excuse for laziness, especially for those who don't even have disorders like ADHD. That's just how I see it.
This is maybe the most misguided and ignorant statement I have ever read on PC.
There are mental disabilities that outright render adults with the intellectual profile of a six year old. Are you telling me a six year old knows the actual severity of right and wrong? Can process complex legal grey areas? What about autism? There are people on the spectrum who just cannot understand social constructs and as such, cannot process the idea of social morality and the laws around them. It absolutely is an excuse which is why no judge worth their salt will ever convict a disabled person without heavily considering if their disability is a mitigating circumstance in their action(s).
My Dyspraxia causes me to have severe issues with depth and distance perception. If I was to have an incident where my Dyspraxia caused me to be a catalyst for an accident then I absolutely would expect my disability/disorder to be considered because it directly caused that to happen.
I think what irks me here is how backwards your logic is. ADHD is a hell of a lot easier to manage than conditions that actually effect your ability to properly interact with society. I'm well and truly in the camp of "you can't use your disability as an excuse" - I'm autistic and was raised that way and I believe I'm better for it - but there are still people out there who literally cannot control themselves and they deserve leniency a lot more than someone who isn't managing ADHD properly.
I apologize if I offended you (or anyone else for that matter). That was not my intention. I wasn't referring to mental disorders like Dyspraxia when I made my post. The incident you described would not make you at fault for accidents of that caliber. I was referring to those who commit a crime and have no history of mental illness, but plea guilty due to insanity, aka they blame it on schizophrenia when they might not even have it. Again, my sincerest apologies... :(
ADHD is listed as being part of the autistic spectrum, unless I'm missing something. And I completely agree with you. When I made my post, I was mainly referring to those who commit a crime and have no history of mental illness, but plea guilty due to insanity, aka they blame it on schizophrenia when they might not even have it. Yes, there are legitimate cases of schizophrenia, but it is foolish to think no one lies while under oath because that is just untrue. I sincerely apologize if I offended you. I wasn't trying to offend anyone. :(
My apologies, i misunderstood your post. I thought you were referring to people with mental disorders commiting a crime they might not understand, sorry.
Snip
ADHD is not part of the autistic spectrum, but both are neurodevelopmental disorders.ADHD is listed as being part of the autistic spectrum, unless I'm missing something.
Disabled people are people! So, they do all the things people do, for instance, using whatever they can to gain an advantage. Some people use their good looks, their youth, their old age, their wealth etc etc.
That's not the same. You'd need to be in at least a normal, unmarginalized position to use something like that to your advantage. Instead, disabled people are hardly considered people by non-disabled people (and even the government) and it's more likely that flaunting with their disability will cause more trouble than good.Disabled people are people! So, they do all the things people do, for instance, using whatever they can to gain an advantage. Some people use their good looks, their youth, their old age, their wealth etc etc.