It's fairly ok, I'd say.
It gets a bit difficult whenever I read more complicated texts. Especially those that go over at least half a page and explain abstractions, made up of more abstractions, by comparing them with other abstractions, also made up of more abstractions, to ultimately come to a conclusion (as an abstraction, which of course is made up of more abstractions) all packed in a sentence that starts innocent up until the first comma, from which point on you'll delve into the very first part - that is, until you get to the first subsentence, usually surrounded by "-", one that in itself could go about half a page - only to reconvene back to the original sentence, which then swiftly introduces you to the second part, only make you realize that "second" does not equate to "last".
Philosophy is fun, I definitely recommend reading some!