Gods that was painful to read... Look I'll be totally honest with you, 90% of that argument was complete bogus. You counter claimed my points with no valid reasoning other than that which fell into the category of blatant denial. You disproved absolutely nothing... and you even tried to dispute
confirmed evidence.
I guess I'll give my closing argument for today. Since it seems we know where we're going with today's lynch anyway.
Another thing, you say you can't be Misa because the na's were being carried out, that is not true.
Those players who left may have been sending their na's anyway, maybe they asked to be removed, maybe they had problems,
maybe they didn't felt like playing anymore, there's too many possibilities. It is pretty obvious that you are nervous
making such terrible accusations, it isn't like you. You are in a difficult position right now and you had to incriminate
someone to save your own skin, you said that yourself.
Reading my emotions through the internet are we? How very clever. It's a shame you're not only completely wrong about me being "nervous" but that you're also making silly mistakes because your desperately grasping at straws to disprove myself.
Meanwhile? Your post proves nothing. You have given not a single piece of evidence that could ever hope to disprove any of the accusations I've made. You can't say I'm wrong because you can't prove otherwise.
Not then, let me tell you why you're so wrong about that point that it hurts!
I don't mean to sound rude... but you CAN read right? It states that the players, Ryu and Shak, whom I have replaced were kicked. It says this specifically. Not to mention that a player gets kicked if they don't vote... tell me did you once see Shak or Ryu post anything at all? Let alone a vote.
Let me get your justification straight... you think that I can be Misa, because the two people whom were Misa before me did their night actions alone, didn't vote in the slightest, only to get kicked for inactivity and pass on the torch? They purposefully got kicked for not voting but still submitted NA's?
Do you even realize how stupid that sounds?! It's literally the worst reasoning I've ever seen in a mafia game! I'm laughing my ass off over here! You say I'm desperate?! Yet one of your responses is that?! Buy a mirror and turn those words to the man looking back at you because they're the only person here they fit.
Seriously folks. All Johnny did in his responses to me was badmouth my logic and repeat the same old no logic self justification. He gave me no real reason to believe his innocence and to be honest his all too ready attitude when it comes to putting the Misa role on me is laughable. You say you were disappointed with my response Johnny but in all honesty yours was the real downer... I was looking forward to open competition and all I got was some blatant denial sprinkled with the stench of desperation to relate me to words in a Day post.
If i was mafia, how do i benefit from this? What's the point of throwing the innocents off the trail?
Do I... do I even need to counter this? I mean is it even necessary? You benefit because the civillians go after targets who aren't mafia. Of course you'd rather they go after civilians over the idealist roles... the roles are much more important. Even if you lose a pledged idealist... it's nothing compared to one of the main roles. Not to mention that by acting like you have our best interests in mind... you gain trust. There's so much benefit for an idealist here that it hurts. You do understand how this game works right?
To be honest m8. You're lucky I have some suspicions for Twiggy too... so I'm alright with lynching her for today... and just for the record.
I was voting for Ulli to stop the bandwagon against me. I believe Ulli is innocent because he started the bandwagon against Gio. Stop trying to kill him AND me for that matter, you silly pups you.
Now then, for now I'll agree to arrest Twiggy. But guys... I hope you can see how incredibly suss Johnny is... and how is argument is flawed in the way that it in no way disproves mine. Not even in the slightest. He says he helped to defend Absol, yet the only reason he did is because of his suspicions that she was Arayoshi... meaning that not having her arrested would benefit him as an idealist or a justice.
Either way, there's no 100% proof that Johnny is idealist. But he's now shooting up to a very high position on my suspect list. I'd recommend that all true innocents keep this in mind.
Also for the record, no, I'm not L... there is a small possibility that I am, but I'm not. I being Misa or any confirmed active idealist (Light himself for example) is disproven, regardless of the faulty arguments others may use to claim otherwise.
So for now, since it's the most logical option for this day phase.