I just thought your "keep an eye on" comment was worth exploring since you seemed to kind of throw it in there as a way to deflect.I don't really find any of you scummy yet. From the perspective of someone trying to find a reason for their vote instead of random voting, Bard's vote makes sense. I guess both scum and town would do that, as town would want to try and scumhunt while scum would want to look like they're scumhunting. But then you also have a valid point - we do tend to ask if anyone has any information if there isn't anything to read yet, and technically Wiz never directly asked the cop to out. Other people might've had useful information as well. Wiz reacted pretty well to the suspicion from Bard too imo.
So basically I don't find anyone in the sus triangle sus yet and not much else has happened yet. I guess the random vote isn't entirely necessary, it's just a placeholder for now. Until someone who's better at poking scum than me pokes some scum, or someone does something wacky.
It's interesting how you decided to poke me and not Pecilia though, who also random voted and didn't also say it was subject to change.
KnightCow
>Jumps on Bard's randomvoteJumping on a random vote is honestly suspect to me.
I guess I'll return the favour and [Drink]Strange, seems fair. I find it a little off how you haven't addressed any of the votes against yourself and are instead going after me for not having anything worthwhile to add on literally D1. I'm still trying to sus everyone out, meanwhile you're already all over the place.
I'm still not entirely sure about you yet, if I see something in this triangle going on I'll change my priorities. Right now, I haven't really gotten a good idea of anyone else so far.
I guess I wasn't super-amazingly-clear on why I was voting you so here's the jist:
You have no votes on you, and I didn't want to be all "let's vote for the other person with a lot of votes and kill them for no reason other than to save my own skin." Your reaction to a *single* vote is a bit concerning. I also don't see how I'm "all over the place." But sure, you do you.
And as for addressing the votes against me, one was Bard doing his "point a finger and watch the reactions" game, and the other was someone who was getting multiple votes and needed a way to save their own skin, by piling a vote onto someone who already had a vote. They literally have no base in anything I've done, other than maybe Bard's. And now I'm seeing HyperMorian's vote which literally says "Not a single lead and can't abstain." and "Not sure who to vote either" So again, not really votes because I'm suspicious but because someone has to die.
I typically almost always lean random vote day 1 unless we got something tho.Yeah it's not like pecillia to initiate a random vote at start of game :x They give their reason but /shrugs
[Drink]Pecillia
Sorry bae~~
You cracked me up with your butchering of Charlie's name there bud. Any reason you are voting for Aquacorde versus any of the other non BWs?![]()
> "oooo! all these replies since i last checked! something meaty is going on!"
> reads them
> sigh
This ****war against Strange sounds really tripe to me, and all his responses seem pretty civil looking over; not to say he isn't scum, but to say that he's done nothing to merit this much suspicion and votes. I do townread Nero for the time being, he comes off as someone who's genuinely following some feeling of suspicion and is now defensive when being challenged by it by the person who voted him, only strengthening how much he wants to hold onto his vote towards Strange.
Also, will vouch for Pecilia, he does random vote on the first day a lot. That isn't unusual.
Would love to hear from Fletch and Hau Now My Name's Too ****ing Long about their exact reason why Strange feels strange to them, maybe I'm just not picking up on something.
A [LYNCH] Aquacorde sounds safe enough since I can't really justify lynching any of the hot-button targets right now.
You cracked me up