Occupy Wall Street

oh. my. god. ARE YOU REALLY THIS DENSE, FREAKY? Listen. Let me make this clear for you since you clearly don't understand:

1. There are VERY LITTLE jobs out there. Saying "just get a job" is not that simple.
2. Higher education tuition rates are at an all time high. When one is paying off a house, a car, bills, debt, and other necessities, sometimes tuition and grants just aren't enough for some families. ESPECIALLY since, most of the time, going to school means giving up a full time job.
3. Unemployment is at an all time high. Again, people can't find work.
4. Meanwhile, banks are making record profits after causing the financial crisis in America.
5. Banks and Business can continue to do so because they BOUGHT our government through supporting politicians who share their interests. We are sick and tired of this injustice caused by this bought system and how the top one percent of wage owners benefit from it, while the bottom 99 percent are expected to pay for the damage they caused and be content with it.


You should be looking for a job. A job hunt is always competitive. You have to market yourself and convince employers why they should hire you and not one of those other 3 people. There is no right to a job. There is also no right to take money from banks because you demonize them for being rich.
 
But does one person getting a job fix the problem of rampant unemployment and lack of jobs in this country? No it does not.

I'm not demonizing them for being rich. I'm demonizing corporations for being overly greedy in a time when there are so many people without. Greed that caused the housing crisis. Greed that shut down many businesses. Greed that made them "too big to fail". Greed that allows them to buy our system, pushes for deregulation, and continues business as usual.
 
But does one person getting a job fix the problem of rampant unemployment and lack of jobs in this country? No it does not.

I'm not demonizing them for being rich. I'm demonizing corporations for being overly greedy in a time when there are so many people without. Greed that caused the housing crisis. Greed that shut down many businesses. Greed that made them "too big to fail". Greed that allows them to buy our system, pushes for deregulation, and continues business as usual.

If we want to create jobs, we need to lower taxes on the top income earners, cut regulations on job creators, and allow people to spend money to stimulate the economy.
 
Cool concept. Bush did that. Obama extended them And look at our situation? JOBS. EFFING. EVERYWHERE. RIGHT? Do I even need to point you back to my previous post, oh my god.
 
Cool concept. Bush did that. Obama extended them And look at our situation? JOBS. EFFING. EVERYWHERE. RIGHT? Do I even need to point you back to my previous post, oh my god.

Obama has increased regulations and made our economy worse with the Dodd-Frank Act.
 
It's not that expensive. Annual tuition is here is $6,890. Community colleges are less than $1,000 for annual tuition. There are also scholarships out there for assistance. If there's a will, there's a way.

Okay, and going to a community college for nearly everyone is a waste of time. And those are the people I'm talking about. Those who went to a community college for a few years, got nothing from it, and moved on to something better- and in capitalist America better only means it's more expensive, even if it's the same thing.

If we want to create jobs, we need to lower taxes on the top income earners, cut regulations on job creators, and allow people to spend money to stimulate the economy.

I really hope you're trolling.
 
I don't know much about Dodd-Frank, but if business as usual is still going on in this country despite it, then clearly, Dodd-Frank did not enforce regulation strictly enough or is too full of loopholes to be truly effective. What we need to do is get corporate money and their lobbying interests out of our government.


And unfortunately, she's not trolling.
 
Okay, and going to a community college for nearly everyone is a waste of time. And those are the people I'm talking about. Those who went to a community college for a few years, got nothing from it, and moved on to something better- and in capitalist America better only means it's more expensive, even if it's the same thing.

Those who go need to be focused and dedicated. I finished community college in 2 years. For some, the tuition is completely waived by the state if your income is low enough. There are scholarships from the school to cover the cost of books. The truly poor would be going for free.
 
Those who go need to be focused and dedicated. I finished community college in 2 years. For some, the tuition is completely waived by the state if your income is low enough. There are scholarships from the school to cover the cost of books. The truly poor would be going for free.

Okay, and I'm going to quote you when I say this... A job hunt is always competitive. You have to market yourself and convince employers why they should hire you and not one of those other 3 people.

Why would a company hire someone who went to a "free" (in your terms) college rather than one who went to a college worth 20+ years of debt?
 
Okay, and I'm going to quote you when I say this... A job hunt is always competitive. You have to market yourself and convince employers why they should hire you and not one of those other 3 people.

Why would a company hire someone who went to a "free" (in your terms) college rather than one who went to a college worth 20+ years of debt?

That depends on the kind of job you are looking for. Also, there are a number of reasons. One is that those who go to expensive universities usually go straight out of high school, so they have little or no job experience versus someone who has plenty of job experience and went back to school later in life. Many go just to advance in the field they are already working in.

Also, those who begin at the free community college can transfer to a 4-year university afterwards and they will have completed the first half of a 4-year degree program. Someone who didn't do very good in high school or has been out of school for awhile can redeem themselves by performing well at the community college, making them excellent scholarship candidates.

You also have to think of if the higher school is worth it. Even if you get a job that pays more, are you really keeping more of your income or is it going to pay off your school loans?
 
The problem with the OWS generation is that we were told, "if you don't want to flip burgers for the rest of your life, get into a 'good college'". Now that many did that, are buried in debt, and unable to find jobs, they're being called lazy and entitled because they didn't want to flip burgers.

AGAIN. Does one person getting a job fix the problem of rampant unemployment and lack of jobs in this country? I don't want to hear any of that tax cuts for the rich, trickle down theory crap either. Bush tax cuts created 6 million jobs and then we lost 8 million BEFORE Dodd-Frank. It doesn't work.
 
The problem with the OWS generation is that we were told, "if you don't want to flip burgers for the rest of your life, get into a 'good college'". Now that many did that and are buried in debt and unable to find jobs, they're being called lazy and entitled because they didn't want to flip burgers.

AGAIN. Does one person getting a job fix the problem of rampant unemployment and lack of jobs in this country? I don't want to hear any of that tax cuts for the rich, trickle down theory crap either. Bush tax cuts created 6 million jobs and then we lost 8 million BEFORE Dodd-Frank. It doesn't work.

I agree that tax cuts only for the rich don't work. Taxes need to be cut across the board. I'm in favor of the FairTax plan or a flat income tax rate. We do; however, need to cut regulations on the banking industry and large corporations so that they can create jobs.
 
It's not that expensive. Annual tuition is here is $6,890. Community colleges are less than $1,000 for annual tuition. There are also scholarships out there for assistance. If there's a will, there's a way.

That is ridiculously low compared to what most people pay. My annual tuition at a technical college on the same level as local community colleges for a full course load happens to be in the ballpark of $6000, which also happens to be the vicinity of the limit of the financial aid I receive, even though that financial aid is supposed to be able to be used to fund my transportation costs of going to and from school. And with the exception of a couple public universities here, the university tuitions are almost twice that even before housing is factored in! And this is still all while the state of Minnesota pays about half of the tuition.

It's not so simple to just "go to college" and "get a job" anymore. College grads are competitng with a legion of more experienced people in their fields for limited jobs, and every single job I've seen posted in my field (and in many other fields I checked out while looking) while doing some early scouting of jobs is looking for at least 3-4 years of experience in addition to the degree and thousands of dollars in certificates college students can't afford to pay for. Heck, fast food joints can even afford to have higher standards for their hires because so many are still jobless.

Tax cuts for the rich do not work in the slightest because essential public services they don't want to admit they rely on provide those extra dollars (such as public transport allowing people to commute further than they could by bike or on foot) that they're trying to get a hold of by having their taxes cut, when they wouldn't have those extra dollars ever enter their hands in the first place if those services didn't exist.

These regulations in and of themselves "create" jobs in the same way that deregulation would, as they have to spend money on services other companies provide in order to proactively and effectively ensure compliance to the regulatons.
 
Haha, lots of crap for me to respond to. This post will also be my once a year wall o text post.

Also "income inequality" is not the government's problem. There are some people who are less fortunate than others. We're not a communist state.

Don't knock communism till you try it. I'll agree that its not perfect, but neither is the type of government we have. All forms of government have perks and flaws, some more then others. Communism's flaws are its lack of certian freedoms. Ours? I'm not going to bother with a list so i'll just say this. While our form of government was great in theory and in practice, early on, it has slowly come more corrupt due to human greed. While the same thing can happen in Communism, at least then you'd know who to kill/overthrow. With ours we have to idea just who is responsable for the mess we are in. You say the Liberials, I say most Republicans and Democrats. In this case, you are close minded in your ideals. I see the bigger picture, which is our government has **** coming at it from both sides, while you only see one side.

Trickle down theory and supply side economics are retarded and have been shown to be ineffective. Nothing trickled down from the tax cuts and the economic situation only got temporarily better just like what will happen if we deregulate businesses and banks; good for short term, bad for long term (see: Great Depression).

+1. It would be great if everyone could realize this. While I believe that some aspects are not needing of large scale regulation, there are a lot more aspects that need regulations crammed down the throat.

As for trickle down, it's really a idealist view made by people that foolishly believe that everypme people can suppress their darker natures for the betterment of all. While SOME do, the sad fact is that most of the ones who can make a difference don't. I'm going to go out on a limb here, but from my experience most of the people who believe this are those raised to be religious.

The poor need to go to school, work hard, and rise above their situation. They should not expect others to take care of them.

Agree to a extent, but if the poor deserve no special privileges then neither do the rich. While I agree that they don't need to be lead by the hand to a better life we DO need to give them the means to reach a better life. After that, its up to them to use those means to reach a better life.

(And that last sentence reminds me of Rite of Passage for some reason.)

Yes, but that's easier said than done. Even if you work hard and go to school, that's no guarantee. Increasingly so as jobs continue to leave.

+1. While I agree with this, another reason is because some people choose dead-end majors. While jobs exist for dead-end majors, those are usually life long jobs, kept until the person is physically no longer able to do work in that field. I can see the use in some of them, but they are (in this economy) more suited to be a minor to supplement another major field.

They shouldn't. So why do rich white guys in business suits get that privilege? "You wrecked the economy? Shame. Here's a bailout. And have some tax cuts while you're at it. Just continue to supply us with $$$, kay? -Love, Bought System." Do you honestly believe the whole "bootstraps" argument will fly in today's education and job environment? YOU. HAVE. NO. CLUE. WHAT. THIS. MOVEMENT. IS. ABOUT.

You forgot one. "We gave you money to fix our system, but feel free to use it for your golden parachutes despite the fact that you caused this mess."

It's not that expensive. Annual tuition is here is $6,890. Community colleges are less than $1,000 for annual tuition. There are also scholarships out there for assistance. If there's a will, there's a way.

You are forgetting the arm, leg, and first born child cost for everything else. Sure ~7k pays for the year, but everything else is what screws a person over.

Also, where there's a Will... Theres relatives. Sorry, couldn't resist.

1. There are VERY LITTLE jobs out there. Saying "just get a job" is not that simple.
2. Higher education tuition rates are at an all time high. When one is paying off a house, a car, bills, debt, and other necessities, sometimes tuition and grants just aren't enough for some families. ESPECIALLY since, most of the time, going to school means giving up a full time job.
3. Unemployment is at an all time high. Again, people can't find work.
4. Meanwhile, banks are making record profits after causing the financial crisis in America.
5. Banks and Business can continue to do so because they BOUGHT our government through supporting politicians who share their interests. We are sick and tired of this injustice caused by this bought system and how the top one percent of wage owners benefit from it, while the bottom 99 percent are expected to pay for the damage they caused and be content with it.

2-5 are all +1's.

As for 1, some times the found job doesn't pay enough to cover expenses or the hours don't cover the expenses. I know a couple people who got cut hours and quit because of that since the pay for those hours wouldn't have covered the gas used to get to and from the job.

You should be looking for a job. A job hunt is always competitive. You have to market yourself and convince employers why they should hire you and not one of those other 3 people. There is no right to a job. There is also no right to take money from banks because you demonize them for being rich.

Agreed on the jobs part. But still, with how bad the economy is even you should realize that something is wrong with the fact that banks are still posting record profits while just about everything else is posting record losses.

You want trickle down economics? Take some of the banks, most likely, ill gotten profits and use them to boost the economy.

I'm not demonizing them for being rich. I'm demonizing corporations for being overly greedy in a time when there are so many people without. Greed that caused the housing crisis. Greed that shut down many businesses. Greed that made them "too big to fail". Greed that allows them to buy our system, pushes for deregulation, and continues business as usual.
+1

My thoughts exactly. You just worded them a lot better then I ever could.

If we want to create jobs, we need to lower taxes on the top income earners, cut regulations on job creators, and allow people to spend money to stimulate the economy.

So we need to do what caused this mess in the first place? We need to do this and pray that what caused this mess, will now fix it? Despite what you think, the cure for lung cancer is not smoking more.

This is a complex problem but your answer is not one that would work. You solution is more money spent will cause jobs to come back.

How can a person spend money if they don't have a job to make money from? Unless your saying that everyone should max out their credit cards, I don't really see how your solution would work.

[quoteOriginally Posted by FreakyLocz14
If we want to create jobs, we need to lower taxes on the top income earners, cut regulations on job creators, and allow people to spend money to stimulate the economy.

I really hope you're trolling.

Sadly, she's not.

I don't know much about Dodd-Frank, but if business as usual is still going on in this country despite it, then clearly, Dodd-Frank did not enforce regulation strictly enough or is too full of loopholes to be truly effective. What we need to do is get corporate money and their lobbying interests out of our government.

Freaky : TeH rEGulTiOnS R ruINeN tEh EcoNOmiEz!
Me and You : Then how are corporations still making profit?
Everyone else : +1
Freaky : YoUZ aLL lIbTarDs!
You to me: Lets not feed the troll anymore
Me to you : Aww. But its fun!
You to Me : Grow up.
Me : *sadface*

I agree that tax cuts only for the rich don't work. Taxes need to be cut across the board. I'm in favor of the FairTax plan or a flat income tax rate. We do; however, need to cut regulations on the banking industry and large corporations so that they can create jobs.

Tax cuts for *insert group here* don't work? How about tax cuts don't work at all?

But yes, a flat tax would be better then what we have. But sadly the Dems and Repubs would proably spend years aruging about what that flat rate should be. Democrats would say 10% and Republicans would say 1% and cut all spending by 75%.

While the party system was good at first, its reached the point where its more of a hindrance rather then a help. I'd like the see the party system gone and let people take their own stances instead of them having to conform to a specific group's views.

Anyway, the start of this downfall was when all the middle class factory jobs started going oversea's because the greedy corporations knew that they could make more money due to the cheaper labor and lack of regulation.

As for labor and regulation, you know what labor their is in area\s with no regulation and/or poorly enforced regulation? Sweat shops, child labor, slavery in all but name, and whatever type of labor that someone thinks most profitable.

Another was the automation of certain work. Its more profitable to buy a robot to work and to pay a person to repair it when it breaks down then it is to hire whatever number of workers the robot replaces. In this case, more profitable can either mean its cheaper or product is assembled quicker and able to be sold quicker.
 
Exactly! The countries with less regulations are where all the jobs are going. This shows that regulations kill jobs.
 
Yes, it DOES.

But lets not forget about just what some of them entail.

Regulations against child labor? Thats a regulation that raises cost of labor. Should be get rid of it and put children back into factories like they were a hundred or so years back?

Regulations that ensured sanitation on food processing. This raises the cost of the product. I suppose we could get rid of this, after all, E. Coli has never killed anyone... Right?

Lets not forget the regulations that are to ensure the safety of certain products... Say, baby cribs. Are you REALLY sure that you want to purchase a crib that hasn't been tested, at all, for safety? Correct me if I'm wrong, but haven't we had cases of defective cribs that ended up killing babies? I'll bet that without regulation, that would happen a lot often. Those events occurred mostly due to regulations about product testing not being properly enforced.

Ohh, another favorite. Lets get rid of those regulations that require testing of certian electronics. Afterall, so what if your T.V suddenly goes boom and burns your house down? And so what if your hair dryer shoots out air so hot that it makes your hair catch fire? After all, who needs hair?

Your coming off as all regulation is bad and all should be gotten rid of. Regulation isn't bad. Regulation is good. Regulation ensures (Or, at least tries to) ensure safety. Something that I think is, at least, somewhat important.

Also, shall I name some of those countries that jobs are being sent to?

Mexico. If you think regulation is bad then drink a lot of Mexican water. When you recover from the pain that it could put you in, then try saying regulation regarding food sanitation is bad.

Africa. Where the children starve to death by the hundreds, and the women have few rights, and proper medical care is (usually) 50 or so miles away by the people who need it, yet can't reach it.

China. Lead paint. That is all I need to say. So go ahread, chew on that cheap toy. At least in this country, with all its regulation, you don't have as large of chance of getting lead poisoning.

Regulation aside, Mexico/Africa/*Insert poor country here* is where the jobs are being sent to because the people there are willing to work for poor wages. You want to keep them factory jobs here? Start accepting the crap hours, very low pay, and lack of safety regulations pertaining to the workplace. Things will go good. Until you get your leg stuck in the machinery, get it ripped off, and get fired since you are unable to work, and have no pension/retirement/SSI making you poor for life.

But you completely MISSED my point about regulations. Yes, they drove jobs away. But those jobs, even WITH your so called 'massive economy killing regulations' were still posting large profits. But greedy corporations always want a little more profit even if there actions to gain that profit completely screw over the average person. So in this case, it was more of a greed problem, not a regulation problem.
 
Last edited:
Yes, it DOES.

But lets not forget about just what some of them entail.

Regulations against child labor? Thats a regulation that raises cost of labor. Should be get rid of it and put children back into factories like they were a hundred or so years back?

Regulations that ensured sanitation on food processing. This raises the cost of the product. I suppose we could get rid of this, after all, E. Coli has never killed anyone... Right?

Lets not forget the regulations that are to ensure the safety of certain products... Say, baby cribs. Are you REALLY sure that you want to purchase a crib that hasn't been tested, at all, for safety? Correct me if I'm wrong, but haven't we had cases of defective cribs that ended up killing babies? I'll bet that without regulation, that would happen a lot often. Those events occurred mostly due to regulations about product testing not being properly enforced.

Ohh, another favorite. Lets get rid of those regulations that require testing of certian electronics. Afterall, so what if your T.V suddenly goes boom and burns your house down? And so what if your hair dryer shoots out air so hot that it makes your hair catch fire? After all, who needs hair?

Your coming off as all regulation is bad and all should be gotten rid of. Regulation isn't bad. Regulation is good. Regulation ensures (Or, at least tries to) ensure safety. Something that I think is, at least, somewhat important.

Also, shall I name some of those countries that jobs are being sent to?

Mexico. If you think regulation is bad then drink a lot of Mexican water. When you recover from the pain that it could put you in, then try saying regulation regarding food sanitation is bad.

Africa. Where the children starve to death by the hundreds, and the women have few rights, and proper medical care is (usually) 50 or so miles away by the people who need it, yet can't reach it.

China. Lead paint. That is all I need to say. So go ahread, chew on that cheap toy. At least in this country, with all its regulation, you don't have as large of chance of getting lead poisoning.

Regulation aside, Mexico/Africa/*Insert poor country here* is where the jobs are being sent to because the people there are willing to work for poor wages. You want to keep them factory jobs here? Start accepting the crap hours, very low pay, and lack of safety regulations pertaining to the workplace. Things will go good. Until you get your leg stuck in the machinery, get it ripped off, and get fired since you are unable to work, and have no pension/retirement/SSI making you poor for life.

If people are not willing to accept the pay and hours, they won't take the job. No one forces them to take a certain job. We need to eliminate the minimum wage so that the free market can create more jobs. As to the water thing, people in Mexico drink the water just fine. We poison our water just as much with fluoride.
 
If people are not willing to accept the pay and hours, they won't take the job. No one forces them to take a certain job. We need to eliminate the minimum wage so that the free market can create more jobs. As to the water thing, people in Mexico drink the water just fine. We poison our water just as much with fluoride.

Yeah. Now that I think about it, the water thing isn't really the best example. The human body is a wonderful thing, able to adapt. We've adapted to all the added chemicals in our water. The Mexicans? They've adapted to the water full of bacteria and... um, crap. (Literally. Crap. As in ****.) Personally, I can't stand the tap water, nor regular filtered water. Me? I like the waters that have added magnesium to it. (Don't know why, but I prefer the slight metallic taste that it has.)

Are you willing to take a job for $4 an hour? How about 5? or 6? 7?

Corporate greed would cause the pay to crash like a jet full of fat people. Know why? Because they can deny a job to a person if they want. As long as they don't deny them based on gender, race or (in some states) sexual orientation. Corps would drive down pay and the people would be forced to accept it, otherwise, they won't have a job. But on the plus side this COULD drive the prices of stuff down... Hmm, damn. You've got me reconsidering this now.

I know, I see the negative in everything first but still, at the very least, I'll never be disappointed unlike people who only see positives. Know why? If I only see the negative, if it doesn't happen then I can be happy. If it does happen, no matter, I foresaw it. Positive people, however, if the negative happens well, they are going to get sad and depressed. If the positive happens, no matter, they foresaw it happening.
 
Yeah. Now that I think about it, the water thing isn't really the best example. The human body is a wonderful thing, able to adapt. We've adapted to all the added chemicals in our water. The Mexicans? They've adapted to the water full of bacteria and... um, crap. (Literally. Crap. As in ****.) Personally, I can't stand the tap water, nor regular filtered water. Me? I like the waters that have added magnesium to it. (Don't know why, but I prefer the slight metallic taste that it has.)

Are you willing to take a job for $4 an hour? How about 5? or 6? 7?

Corporate greed would cause the pay to crash like a jet full of fat people. Know why? Because they can deny a job to a person if they want. As long as they don't deny them based on gender, race or (in some states) sexual orientation. Corps would drive down pay and the people would be forced to accept it, otherwise, they won't have a job. But on the plus side this COULD drive the prices of stuff down... Hmm, damn. You've got me reconsidering this now.

I know, I see the negative in everything first but still, at the very least, I'll never be disappointed unlike people who only see positives. Know why? If I only see the negative, if it doesn't happen then I can be happy. If it does happen, no matter, I foresaw it. Positive people, however, if the negative happens well, they are going to get sad and depressed. If the positive happens, no matter, they foresaw it happening.

I'd take a $4 an hour job if I wan dirt poor and was currently making $0 an hour. If nobody wants to work at those wages, the free market will force employers to provide higher wages or they won't have any employees.
 
Back
Top