If it evolves into something good, it gets an O.K. And not including Megas in this list, either.
A display of dumb-looking and poorly designed Pokémon throughout the ages.
Okay- so it ain't that bad, really- my main beef with it is that it means that Luvdisc is still a thing. It will never evolve. That's like making Magikarp and Gyarados two different lines.
Incessant stare, creepy smile, and groping sausage fingers. Where do we file a registry for this thing?
I actually kinda like 'em (a lot of these are actually among some of my favourites), but I do admit that they're pretty lazy designs.
It's an Easter Egg with appendages. What the hell is a "Water Rabbit"?
Butterflies are amongst the most beautiful sights in this world- until you see them up close. Way to emphasize their worst features there, Gamefreak.
I just don't get what they were aiming for here.
Beware the flying testicles or poor design.
Funny, but ugly.
Three-headed bird and a pack of dildos.
Accurate to its legend, but its still a weird-lookin' bugger.
Venomoth did it right the first time. You can go now.
Muk did it right the first time. You can go now.
So ugly that I can now look at my school yearbook photos with pride and admiration.
I don't know who thought Electric Eel = Used Condom, but- whatever.
What is this supposed to even be.
I think it's their expressions, but the entire family looks tortured to me. Like they want to pass on, but cannot- and remain here trapped. Forever.
I get that that's kinda their point- but a failed creation is still a failed creation.
Purely personal. Magneton is one of my favourite Pokémon ever. I appreciate Gamefreak giving it the opportunity to grow into a more powerful contender- but I really wish that they just gave it the stat boosts and kept its design the same. I just think it looks cooler as it is.
Its Mega is
much worse- but the conehead isn't exactly sterling, either.
Bert, Ernie? Sesame Street is over thataway.
Sawsbuck did it right the second time. You can go now.
I get the motifs behind it, but the whole is less than the sum of its parts.
Why.