The Darkest Dungeon

no bitches got carved up enough it seems
 
So this confirms that the different types of terrors and evils that lurk do not work together. I had figured as much, but it's nice for it to be completely confirmed (The Hag hitting one of the Swine-things).

Looks like the Leper has some form of investigative powers, not sure how so. At first glance I took it as him finding an evil one among us - but I think it just plainly means the Leper knows for sure if the person is good/bad.

Whomever the Arbalest is, good job! I figured she'd have a night action where she could shoot someone. Looks like she nailed one of the baddies. Don't know if a reveal is a good idea or not for her, but we could def' start working away at the Bloodletter bad guy and possibly kill him day 1. Obviously don't RR quite yet, we should decide as a group (and yourself independently, too - since you know your role and value better than the rest of us).

Don't quite understand the M-a-A's thing. He can protect 3 people at night, but one of them didn't actually get protected? Was it maybe he accidentally tried to protect a bad guy, and because of such they got hit by another NA and still suffered? If so, that's neat if the MaA can protect people but doesn't actually go to protect if one of the people he targets is actually bad?

It also looks like the Crusader got hit by something (or did an NA and got hurt for it???) and one of the bad guys hit the Caretaker, as well. If the Man at Arms can protect good guys from bad guys, hopefully they can find and protect the caretaker from harm.

That's all I got for now ^-^;
 
So,

-The Swine Prince was attacked by the Hag (-6)
-The Caretaker was attacked by the Shambler (-5)
-The Bloodletter was attacked by the Arbalist (-1)

That just leaves the Crusader's damage unaccounted for, which means they were either one of the ones inadvertently attacked by one of the Heroes, or they might have been one of the ones the Man-at-Arms failed to protected from the "machinations of the darkness".

But what does it mean that the Bloodletter "unleashed his fury" on two others?
 
I think it is talking about the Arbalist, not the Bloodletter. Meaning it did 1 damage to two other players as well.
 
So if the Bloodletter has the ability to attack twice... Maybe the Swine Prince got attacked by the Hag and the Bloodletter? The Bloodletter could've attacked the Crusader and the Swine Prince. The Swine Prince then took 3 damage from both the Hag and the Bloodletter.

I mean, the Bloodletter might've gone for the Caretaker, but it doesn't seem like he was visited by anyone else aside from the Shambler. Plus, this way the numbers add up and would make quite the amount of sense.

So by that terms it looks like:
-The Swine Prince was attacked by the Hag (-3) and the Bloodletter (-3)
-The Caretaker was attacked by the Shambler (-5)
-The Bloodletter was attacked by the Arbalist (-1)
-The Crusader was attacked by the Bloodletter (-3)
-A Villager was attacked by the Crane (-5)
 
Omicron said:
I think it is talking about the Arbalist, not the Bloodletter. Meaning it did 1 damage to two other players as well.
Click to expand...
That seems unlikely considering the Bloodletter is referred to as a "he", while the Arbalist, "her". It goes on to say that "his fury" is unleashed on two others.
 
machomuu said:
That seems unlikely considering the Bloodletter is referred to as a "he", while the Arbalist, "her". It goes on to say that "his fury" is unleashed on two others.
Click to expand...

That's right. My mistake.
 
Omicron said:
I think it is talking about the Arbalist, not the Bloodletter. Meaning it did 1 damage to two other players as well.
Click to expand...

Incorrect:

The Arbalist had followed footsteps through the brush during the night and fired her crossbow at their foe, the Bloodletter. He ran deeper into the dark woods, but his fury was unleashed upon two others.
Click to expand...

Bolded the important part to determine the difference here. The Arbalist is a female, and but the part about going berserk in the woods was referred with a 'he'. I feel like it is safe to assume the Bloodletter hit two people -> one of which may be the crusader and someone else whom had taken damage. I say this because sans Crusader, all the damage has been accounted for in the Day post. So it's possible the same person got hit twice, and we just don't know who ebcause we don't know the amounts/values of damage each person does.

I'm also assuming NA damage/attack values will differ compared to our normal attack value during the day? <- I would like someone to confirm this for me, without RRing. I'm curious
xD
If it risks an inno's safety though, then no one risk themselves. x.x;

edit: Oh as a small thing I just noticed:
It seems the bad guy NA's do a lot more damage than good guy NA's. Makes sense, since in normal mafia the bad guys are the typical killers. So let's just be efficient and not derp during the days. <3
 
Last edited:
I believe the passage about the Man-at-Arms being only able to protect from harm, but not fromother machinations of the darkness, may mean he can protect them from damage but not from madness/mind-control/loosing their senses (literally)/...be creative here. Maybe someone he stood watch over is now compelled to attack a certain person or blind or ...

I accounted the 3 damage to the Crusader to "Other Heroes had tried their luck during the night, but many learned nothing and some even harmed their own comrades."
If we account the Bloodletter for this damage, their must be some no-damage harm here too!?

Edit:
Ullion said:
I'm also assuming NA damage/attack values will differ compared to our normal attack value during the day?
Click to expand...
Klippy said:
Your attack power is determined by your role
Click to expand...
I'm pretty curious about the bookkeeping of damage and HP here, because if dmg is really different per role, it can give hints as to what role somebody is if you know who attacked who. But yes, probably a lot of not-villagers will have an amount of damage other then 2 Attack.
 
Last edited:
faer said:
I'm pretty curious about the bookkeeping of damage and HP here, because if dmg is really different per role, it can give hints as to what role somebody is if you know who attacked who. But yes, probably a lot of not-villagers will have an amount of damage other then 2 Attack.
Click to expand...

This is a really good idea. So we can take note of who does what amount of damage by their attacks during the day, and cross-reference with how much damage was done by the various roles at night. We should definitely make some effort to keep a damage/HP log of some sort.
 
I feel like Klippy is being vague about the damage -> role thing. I understand each role has their own Attack power based off their role. But what I'm saying is, does damage dealt via night actions really reflect how much damage a role does during their day attack? The value could easily be different.

For example, we already know the Arbalist's night action deals 1 damage. That's very little in comparison to the other damage values we see being done, right? But what if she attacks during the day -> will her attack still be one? In my opinion, night actions/attacks =/= day attack damage.

We can definitely try to cross reference amounts of damage, hell you might even be right. It's 100% worth keeping track of. But Keep what I said above in mind.
 
Ah right, you have a point, Ulli. I guess we just don't know enough right now to rely on it too heavily. I'm still favor of keeping track of it though, of course.
 
Also assuming that there's several roles with the same dmg. Nonetheless I will keep track just in case there's something to be noticed.

Also for damage analysis of tonight, what about this:
-The Swine Prince was attacked by the Hag (-5) and the Bloodletter (-1)
-The Caretaker was attacked by the Shambler (-5)
-The Bloodletter was attacked by the Arbalist (-1)
-The Crusader was attacked by the Bloodletter (-1) and a Hero (-2)
-A Villager was attacked by the Crane (-5)
 
6 damage in one night?! GG Swine Prince.

Here are a few of my D1 analysis:
  • The Hag attacked one of "the Piggies", revealed as the Swine Prince
  • The Crane's centipede attacked one Villager
  • The Leper investigated someone who's evil
  • The Arbalist attacked the Bloodletter, but it escaped and recoiled damage toward 2 others (I think it was the Caretaker, Swine Prince or Villager)
  • The Man-at-Arms protected 3 players but one of them was attacked.
  • The Shambler attacked the Caretaker.

The Crusader took damage as well! Maybe it was the Bloodletter's doing? Hmmm. He wasn't mentioned in the post in a way :/ Mysterious.
 
Well, the Swine Prince is one of the toughest baddies. I am sure that he probably still has way more than half his HP left.

I'm honestly glad we're chipping away at the Swine Prince's health.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top