- 7,739
- Posts
- 18
- Years
- Seen Sep 18, 2020
I just mean closing them when ye could do something else with them.I agree with you, though I wouldn't go so far as to say closing a thread is a destructive action but I don't believe we should argue semantics.
Eh? Never knew that. I would say the rules should be enforced consistently, yet... is personality really that important to most members?people already complain to us about how we're all just robots practicing uniformity and have very few distinctive qualities amongst ourselves
That's what I'd call splitting. I hate to see a moderator enter a thread and say "stop posting offtopic, guys"... like, what; just remove the off-topic discussion and put it into its own thread. And make sure to leave your own post noting you've done that; it is admittedly confusing to see posts shuffled around without announcement.In any case, no we cannot "split" threads necessarily, as when you merge a thread the posted dates often clash and end up moving the posts around so that the timeline fits for hybrid view, however we can select posts within a thread and choose to either move them to a different thread or make them become their own thread entirely.
Yes, that's part of it.If you're talking about the 'closing because I can't see this doing well/being active' though, I completely agree :) we should be giving threads a chance and not just shutting things because we wouldn't post in them. If two people want to discuss the topic, that is validity enough.
That's awesome, nice to see.Here is an example of a thread I'm gladly allowing in Pokémon General. Because it doesn't hurt anyone that it exists, it's not trying to lure someone to a different site, it's just someone who needs help with something pokémon related that doesn't seem to fit well in any other board.
Last edited: