I think a better way of looking at it would be "if a person is not a burden on society" rather than "if a person actively contributes to society". As long as someone is not a drain on society they can do whatever the hell they want, we don't exist purely as cogs of some big machine and we are entitled to our own sense of fulfilment.
Yeah, I think that's the main point and goal individually. I think that at some point, though, you should give back in some way to the collective society. I don't think it's right to benefit from, as is the case in Canada, the health care system, the educational system, etc. and not give back in some way that isn't taxes. You're right that this is basically the overall idea I have, though: just don't be a societal leach.
Nice to know you don't find the work I enjoy respectable simply because it isn't highly-qualified. Real nice. I'm sorry to be antagonistic, but I really don't think your outlook is reasonable. What makes you feel that way?
I think I read that you're a garderner, right? That's not necessarily a bad thing. I like flowers and plants, etc. too. Gimmiepie probably put it in better words than I did. I don't like leaches who leach on purpose or have screwed themselves up that they can feasibly only be leaches. My mother's side of the family - three aunts with over ten kids between 'em - are all unemployed welfare leaches who had children young and never acquired highschool diplomas. They have no ambition to amount to anything and for the foreseeable future will just continue to accept their monthly child benefits and social works cheques.
If it's by horrible luck that someone is in that situation, then it's OK. We're not all lucky. We're not born with equal chances, as much as we might like to think anyway. My aunts and other extended family have made some poor, practically irreversible choices. I'm so far the only individual between my parents, my aunts, my cousins and my siblings that will acquire post-secondary (or even a secondary school degree; most of them do not even have one of those) and be eligible for what even they dub as "meaningful" employment. What's sad is that they recognize that they're not going anywhere but don't bother to change it. Their children are the ones that will really suffer from that. The case files at CAS for even myself and siblings, let alone them with their drug issues and debt, is stupidly large. It's unfortunate. At least one of my aunts prioritizes her children, though. The other two have taken and wasted their children's trust fund from our late grandfather or use their social works for drugs and alcohol. Not cool :pink_no:
But yeah, take what I said more like what Gimmiepie said about being a leach. Society can't survive without having individuals who pursue gardening, customer service, etc. as employment. If everyone had post-secondary-type jobs in large firms, as professors, etc. there'd be no one left to do the jobs no one wants to do or that do not pay as much, but are perhaps less stressful (as is the case with gardening - oo~ flowers ♥). Unless by then we develop some pretty neat high-tech robots, but then we'd still garden for fun :pink_tongue: